FIGURE 18 - uploaded by Robert E. Weems
Content may be subject to copyright.
Skull of Procolpochelys grandaeva, USNM 358862, from the lower Miocene of Maryland. A, left lateral, B, posterior, C, dorsal, and D, ventral views. In B a clayball is visible holding the skull roof in its correct relative position to the basicranium.  

Skull of Procolpochelys grandaeva, USNM 358862, from the lower Miocene of Maryland. A, left lateral, B, posterior, C, dorsal, and D, ventral views. In B a clayball is visible holding the skull roof in its correct relative position to the basicranium.  

Source publication
Article
Full-text available
In the Oligocene Ashley and Chandler Bridge formations near Charleston, South Carolina, remains of three species of pancheloniid sea turtle are common. In their relative order of abundance, they are Carolinochelys wilsoni, Ashleychelys palmeri, gen. et sp. nov., and Procolpochelys charlestonensis, sp. nov. Unlike the other two Oligocene South Carol...

Citations

... However, length estimates were different for some taxonomic groups (Table 1). For example, in invertebrates and marine turtles, length was often directly measured from fossil remains representing the majority of the animal's body, such as column length, shell diameters, maximum shell size and carapace lengths (Weems and Sanders, 2014;Ifrim et al., 2021). Fish body sizes were inferred using three types of length measurementstotal length, standard length and fork length (see definitions in Table 1). ...
Article
Full-text available
The modern marine megafauna is known to play important ecological roles and includes many charismatic species that have drawn the attention of both the scientific community and the public. However, the extinct marine megafauna has never been assessed as a whole, nor has it been defined in deep time. Here, we review the literature to define and list the species that constitute the extinct marine megafauna, and to explore biological and ecological patterns throughout the Phanerozoic. We propose a size cut-off of 1 m of length to define the extinct marine megafauna. Based on this definition, we list 706 taxa belonging to eight main groups. We found that the extinct marine megafauna was conspicuous over the Phanerozoic and ubiquitous across all geological eras and periods, with the Mesozoic, especially the Cretaceous, having the greatest number of taxa. Marine reptiles include the largest size recorded (21 m; Shonisaurus sikanniensis ) and contain the highest number of extinct marine megafaunal taxa. This contrasts with today’s assemblage, where marine animals achieve sizes of >30 m. The extinct marine megafaunal taxa were found to be well-represented in the Paleobiology Database, but not better sampled than their smaller counterparts. Among the extinct marine megafauna, there appears to be an overall increase in body size through time. Most extinct megafaunal taxa were inferred to be macropredators preferentially living in coastal environments. Across the Phanerozoic, megafaunal species had similar extinction risks as smaller species, in stark contrast to modern oceans where the large species are most affected by human perturbations. Our work represents a first step towards a better understanding of the marine megafauna that lived in the geological past. However, more work is required to expand our list of taxa and their traits so that we can obtain a more complete picture of their ecology and evolution.
... Argillochelys sp. (referred to A. antiqua by Dollo [1907] and to cheloniid by Zangerl [1971]) from the Thanetian (Hannut Formation) of the Erquelinnes locality, Belgium (photographs of IRSNB 1653 from R. Hirayama); Argillochelys sp. from the Bartonian of Ak-Kaya 1 locality, Russia ; Argillochelys sp. from the Lutetian of Ikovo locality, Russia (Zvonok et al. 2013b); Ashleychelys palmeri Weems et Sanders, 2014 from the upper Rupelian (upper part of the Ashley Formation) and the upper Chattian (Chandler Bridge Formation) of several localities (East bank of the Limehouse Branch type locality), USA (Weems and Sanders 2014); Bryochelys waterkeynii Smets, 1887 from the Rupelian (Boom Formation) of several localities, Belgium (Smets 1887(Smets , 1888; Carolinochelys wilsoni Hay, 1923 from the upper Rupelian (upper part of the Ashley Formation) and the upper Chattian (Chandler Bridge Formation) of several localities (Ingleside type locality), USA (Weems and Sanders 2014); "Chelone" convexa Owen, 1842 (probable synonym of Argillochelys cuneiceps) from the Ypresian (London Clay Formation) of the Isle of Sheppey locality, UK (Owen and Bell 1849); "Dollochelys" casieri Zangerl, 1971 (= Catapleura repanda (Cope, 1868) sensu Hirayama, 2006) from the Thanetian (Hannut Formation) of Erquelinnes locality, Belgium (Zangerl 1971); Eochelone brabantica Dollo, 1903 from the lower Lutetian (Brussel Formation) of several localities (Saint Remy-Geest type locality), Belgium (Casier 1968 ; Erquelinnesia gosseleti (Dollo, 1886) from the Thanetian (Hannut Formation) of the Erquelinnes locality, Belgium (Zan-gerl 1971); Euclastes roundsi (Weems, 1988) from the Thanetian (Aquia Formation) of the Liverpool Point and Pamunkey River bluffs localities (Weems 1988); Euclastes wielandi (Hay, 1908) from several Maastrichtian-Thanetian formations and localities of Angola, Chile, Morocco and USA (Ullmann and Carr 2021); Glossochelys planimentum (Owen, 1842) (probable synonym of Erquelinnesia gosseleti) from the Ypresian (Harwich Formation) of the Harwich locality, UK (Owen and Bell 1849); Glyptochelone suyckerbuycki (Ubaghs, 1879) from the upper Maastrichtian (Maastricht Formation) of the Valkenburg aan de Geul locality, Netherlands (de Lapparent de Broin et al. 2018: fig. 11h, i); Lepidochelys olivacea (Eschscholtz, 1829), extant (pers. ...
... Argillochelys sp. (referred to A. antiqua by Dollo [1907] and to cheloniid by Zangerl [1971]) from the Thanetian (Hannut Formation) of the Erquelinnes locality, Belgium (photographs of IRSNB 1653 from R. Hirayama); Argillochelys sp. from the Bartonian of Ak-Kaya 1 locality, Russia ; Argillochelys sp. from the Lutetian of Ikovo locality, Russia (Zvonok et al. 2013b); Ashleychelys palmeri Weems et Sanders, 2014 from the upper Rupelian (upper part of the Ashley Formation) and the upper Chattian (Chandler Bridge Formation) of several localities (East bank of the Limehouse Branch type locality), USA (Weems and Sanders 2014); Bryochelys waterkeynii Smets, 1887 from the Rupelian (Boom Formation) of several localities, Belgium (Smets 1887(Smets , 1888; Carolinochelys wilsoni Hay, 1923 from the upper Rupelian (upper part of the Ashley Formation) and the upper Chattian (Chandler Bridge Formation) of several localities (Ingleside type locality), USA (Weems and Sanders 2014); "Chelone" convexa Owen, 1842 (probable synonym of Argillochelys cuneiceps) from the Ypresian (London Clay Formation) of the Isle of Sheppey locality, UK (Owen and Bell 1849); "Dollochelys" casieri Zangerl, 1971 (= Catapleura repanda (Cope, 1868) sensu Hirayama, 2006) from the Thanetian (Hannut Formation) of Erquelinnes locality, Belgium (Zangerl 1971); Eochelone brabantica Dollo, 1903 from the lower Lutetian (Brussel Formation) of several localities (Saint Remy-Geest type locality), Belgium (Casier 1968 ; Erquelinnesia gosseleti (Dollo, 1886) from the Thanetian (Hannut Formation) of the Erquelinnes locality, Belgium (Zan-gerl 1971); Euclastes roundsi (Weems, 1988) from the Thanetian (Aquia Formation) of the Liverpool Point and Pamunkey River bluffs localities (Weems 1988); Euclastes wielandi (Hay, 1908) from several Maastrichtian-Thanetian formations and localities of Angola, Chile, Morocco and USA (Ullmann and Carr 2021); Glossochelys planimentum (Owen, 1842) (probable synonym of Erquelinnesia gosseleti) from the Ypresian (Harwich Formation) of the Harwich locality, UK (Owen and Bell 1849); Glyptochelone suyckerbuycki (Ubaghs, 1879) from the upper Maastrichtian (Maastricht Formation) of the Valkenburg aan de Geul locality, Netherlands (de Lapparent de Broin et al. 2018: fig. 11h, i); Lepidochelys olivacea (Eschscholtz, 1829), extant (pers. ...
... Argillochelys sp. (referred to A. antiqua by Dollo [1907] and to cheloniid by Zangerl [1971]) from the Thanetian (Hannut Formation) of the Erquelinnes locality, Belgium (photographs of IRSNB 1653 from R. Hirayama); Argillochelys sp. from the Bartonian of Ak-Kaya 1 locality, Russia ; Argillochelys sp. from the Lutetian of Ikovo locality, Russia (Zvonok et al. 2013b); Ashleychelys palmeri Weems et Sanders, 2014 from the upper Rupelian (upper part of the Ashley Formation) and the upper Chattian (Chandler Bridge Formation) of several localities (East bank of the Limehouse Branch type locality), USA (Weems and Sanders 2014); Bryochelys waterkeynii Smets, 1887 from the Rupelian (Boom Formation) of several localities, Belgium (Smets 1887(Smets , 1888; Carolinochelys wilsoni Hay, 1923 from the upper Rupelian (upper part of the Ashley Formation) and the upper Chattian (Chandler Bridge Formation) of several localities (Ingleside type locality), USA (Weems and Sanders 2014); "Chelone" convexa Owen, 1842 (probable synonym of Argillochelys cuneiceps) from the Ypresian (London Clay Formation) of the Isle of Sheppey locality, UK (Owen and Bell 1849); "Dollochelys" casieri Zangerl, 1971 (= Catapleura repanda (Cope, 1868) sensu Hirayama, 2006) from the Thanetian (Hannut Formation) of Erquelinnes locality, Belgium (Zangerl 1971); Eochelone brabantica Dollo, 1903 from the lower Lutetian (Brussel Formation) of several localities (Saint Remy-Geest type locality), Belgium (Casier 1968 ; Erquelinnesia gosseleti (Dollo, 1886) from the Thanetian (Hannut Formation) of the Erquelinnes locality, Belgium (Zan-gerl 1971); Euclastes roundsi (Weems, 1988) from the Thanetian (Aquia Formation) of the Liverpool Point and Pamunkey River bluffs localities (Weems 1988); Euclastes wielandi (Hay, 1908) from several Maastrichtian-Thanetian formations and localities of Angola, Chile, Morocco and USA (Ullmann and Carr 2021); Glossochelys planimentum (Owen, 1842) (probable synonym of Erquelinnesia gosseleti) from the Ypresian (Harwich Formation) of the Harwich locality, UK (Owen and Bell 1849); Glyptochelone suyckerbuycki (Ubaghs, 1879) from the upper Maastrichtian (Maastricht Formation) of the Valkenburg aan de Geul locality, Netherlands (de Lapparent de Broin et al. 2018: fig. 11h, i); Lepidochelys olivacea (Eschscholtz, 1829), extant (pers. ...
Article
The article provides an overview of all known 39 localities of the Paleogene turtles of Eastern Europe. Numerous remains of turtles are described for the first time from 19 localities, of which six are new, and 13 are the localities from which materials were only mentioned previously. Among them are Pan-Trionychidae indet., Pan-Cheloniidae indet., Dermochelyidae indet. and Pan-Testudines indet., as well as pan-cheloniids Argillochelys sp. from the Ypresian Novoivanovka and the Ypresian or Lutetian Gruzinov localities. Several indeterminate specimens from Eocene localities show similarity to pan-cheloniids Argillochelys cuneiceps (Owen, 1849) and Puppigerus camperi (Gray, 1831) or Tasbacka aldabergeni Nessov, 1987, and dermochelyids Natemys peruvianus Wood et al., 1996 or “Psephophorus” rupeliensis van Beneden, 1883. One specimen of costal 1 of Pan-Testudines indet. from the Lutetian Krasnorechenskoe locality resembles that of pleurodires Eocenochelus spp. and Neochelys spp. In addition, new materials of turtles are described from five previously known localities. Among them, new and additionally restored specimens from the Bartonian Ak-Kaya 1 locality of the pan-cheloniid Argillochelys sp., and the dermochelyid Cosmochelys sp., which expand data on their morphology and intraspecific variability. The specimens of pan-cheloniids with deep and dense sculpturing of the external shell surface from the Bakhmutovka, Bulgakovka, Krasnorechenskoe and Tripolye localities clearly belong to a new species, not described due to fragmentary material. It is supposed that Anhuichelys-like pan-testudinoids migrated from Asia in Eastern Europe in the Danian age, and were preserved as relict Dithyrosternon valdense Pictet et Humbert, 1855 until the Priabonian age.
... Chesi et al. (2007) studied new material from Italy referable to Trachyaspis lardyi and agreed that this taxon clearly represents a cheloniid sea turtle. Therefore, the oldest valid name for the Calvert Formation material is Trachyaspis lardyi and not Syllomus aegyptiacus, and Weems and George (2013) and Weems and Sanders (2014) have concurred with this conclusion. The carapace and plastron surface pattern, consisting of raised areas of bumps and elongate vermiform ridges, is distinctive and makes this turtle exceptionally easy to identify. ...
Book
This volume is a follow-on to a work published by Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press in 2018 on the Miocene vertebrate fauna from Calvert Cliffs, Maryland, USA. Two chapters are included in this compendium, one on turtles (chelonians) and the other on toothed whales (odontocetes). It is anticipated that two more volumes will be needed to complete the taxonomic review. Robert E. Weems details the occurrence of 19 kinds of chelonians that have been discovered in the Miocene and Pliocene marine strata of Delaware, Maryland, and Virginia, USA, 13 of them in the Calvert Cliffs. The most commonly found remains are those of an extinct sea turtle, Trachyaspis lardyi. Remains of four other marine turtles, Procolpochelys grandaeva, Lepidochelys sp., a generically indeterminate cheloniid, and a leatherback turtle (Psephophorus polygonus), are far less common. The other 14 chelonian taxa are nonmarine forms that inhabited the land, rivers, and marshes west of the Mid-Atlantic Seaboard during the Miocene. They were washed into the coastal marine environments that were then accumulating the sediments exposed today as the strata in the Calvert Cliffs. Stephen J. Godfrey and Olivier Lambert review the taxonomically diverse odontocete fauna of 29 named species. Nine of these Miocene taxa represent newly named species. Fragmentary remains hint at even greater diversity. Reviewed taxa are restricted to those known from along the Calvert Cliffs and other Miocene age deposits on the Atlantic Coastal Plain in Maryland and Virginia, USA. They range in age from approximately 22 to 8 Ma and derive from the Calvert, Choptank, and St. Marys Formations. This fauna preserves one of the most abundant and diverse assemblages of extinct toothed whales known. None of the named odontocete species included in this review are known from beyond the North Atlantic Ocean. In terms of their chronostratigraphic distribution, collectively, they range in age from the Aquitanian through the Tortonian, with the large majority occurring within the Burdigalian, Langhian, and Serravallian stages (the latter two being the most speciose). The greatest taxonomic diversity occurred during the Miocene Climate Optimum, a time (ca. 17–15 Ma) when global average temperatures were as much as 4°C to 5°C above today’s average temperatures, at least for much of that interval.
... Chesi et al. (2007) studied new material from Italy referable to Trachyaspis lardyi and agreed that this taxon clearly represents a cheloniid sea turtle. Therefore, the oldest valid name for the Calvert Formation material is Trachyaspis lardyi and not Syllomus aegyptiacus, and Weems and George (2013) and Weems and Sanders (2014) have concurred with this conclusion. The carapace and plastron surface pattern, consisting of raised areas of bumps and elongate vermiform ridges, is distinctive and makes this turtle exceptionally easy to identify. ...
Article
A taxonomically diverse toothed whale (Cetacea, Odontoceti) fauna of 29 named species is known from along the Calvert Cliffs and other Miocene age deposits (Chesapeake Group) within the Chesapeake Bay region (Atlantic Coastal Plain, Maryland and Virginia, USA). They range in age from approximately 22 to 8 Ma and derive from the Calvert, Choptank, and St. Marys Formations. Representatives of the following families are known: Squalodontidae, Physeteridae, Ziphiidae, Squalodelphinidae, Platanistidae, Eurhinodelphinidae, Kentriodontidae, Pontoporiidae, and basal delphinidans formerly placed within Kentriodontidae. Four of these families have living representatives: Physeteridae, Ziphiidae, Platanistidae, and Pontoporiidae. Squalodontidae is represented by three species: Squalodon calvertensis, S. whitmorei, and S. murdochi sp. nov. Physeteridae includes Orycterocetus crocodilinus and “Aulophyseter” mediatlanticus. Ziphiidae includes two unnamed species: cf. Messapicetus sp. and Ziphiidae incertae sedis. Squalodelphinidae is known by at least two species: Phocageneus venustus and an undetermined species. Platanistidae is represented by five species: Araeodelphis natator, Grimadelphis spectorum gen. et sp. nov., Zarhachis flagellator, Pomatodelphis inaequalis, and Pomatodelphis santamaria sp. nov. Eurhinodelphinidae features at least four species: Xiphiacetus bossi, X. cristatus, Schizodelphis barnesi, and S. morckhoviensis. Kentriodontidae includes Kentriodon pernix. Other Miocene delphinidans (most of which have previously been included within the Kentriodontidae) include Brevirostrodelphis dividum (new combination), Hadrodelphis calvertense, Macrokentriodon morani, Miminiacetus pappus (new combination), Pithanodelphis cornutus (recognized here from the Atlantic Coastal Plain for the first time), Lophocetus calvertensis, and four new delphinidans: Herbeinodelphis nancei gen. et sp. nov., Cammackacetus hazenorum gen. et sp. nov., Pictodelphis kidwellae gen. et sp. nov., and Westmorelandelphis tacheroni gen. et sp. nov. Pontoporiidae is represented by a single named species, Stenasodelphis russellae. Odontoceti incertae sedis includes a Chilcacetus-grade odontocete, Caolodelphis milleri gen. et sp. nov., the puzzling Enigmatocetus posidoni gen. et sp. nov., and other partial skulls. Sixty-two percent of the Miocene odontocetes from Maryland and Virginia are endemic to this region, and 83% are known only from the western North Atlantic. In terms of their chronostratigraphic distribution, collectively, they range in age from Aquitanian through Tortonian, with the large majority occurring within the Burdigalian, Langhian, and Serravallian stages.
... Based on this information, the coprolite is likely not older than Early Oligocene. During the Oligocene, the area around Summerville was a nearshore coastal environment (Weems & Sanders, 2014). ...
Article
Full-text available
Vertebrate-bitten coprolites are seemingly rare; nonetheless, within the past dozen years, a handful of these composite trace fossils have been found and described. Here, we describe a single crocodile coprolite from the Lower Miocene Calvert Formation in New Kent County, Virginia, USA, showing bite marks. The size and morphology of the coprolite is consistent with a crocodilian origin. Seven parallel, gently curving gouges, of biogenic origin, disrupt the surface of the coprolite. As it is a medium preserving bite marks, this coprolite qualifies as a morderolite. Furthermore, because of the presence of larger/deeper primary, and finer secondary gouges, which we interpreted as individual tooth marks, the identity of the vertebrate that bit the coprolite is most likely gar (Lepisosteidae). Because other comparable coprolites preserving similar sets of primary and secondary gouges are known, this unique trace fossil is given a new ichnotaxonomic name, Machichnus dimorphodon isp. nov. Many more much smaller markings, interpreted as feeding traces by smaller organisms (possibly invertebrates) also ornament the surface of the coprolite.
... When coupled with the few body fossils of Platylepas that are known to date, as well as with the available molecular data, the above list of potential turtle barnacle ichnofossils-scanty as it is-allows for shedding some light on the evolutionary history of platylepadids and the deep past of their symbiotic relationship with sea turtles. Cheloniids may have hosted platylepadid symbionts as early as during the early Oligocene [107], a hypothesis that fits well the most recent divergence time estimates for turtle barna-cles [22]. Two Miocene carapace specimens from Italy and Peru ( [22]; this work) feature Karethraichnus lakkos-like scars, suggesting widespread colonization of the sea turtle shell by platylepadid epibionts not later than in Tortonian times. ...
... Overview of the occurrences of bone modifications on fossil chelonians that are interpreted herein as reflecting barnacle attachment. See Section 4 for details.As regards the Palaeogene record, Weems and Sanders[107] mentioned a circular scar on a carapace of the cheloniid Carolinochelys wilsoni ...
Article
Full-text available
In spite of the widespread occurrence of epibiotic turtle barnacles (Coronuloidea: Chelonibiidae and Platylepadidae) on extant marine turtles (Chelonioidea: Cheloniidae and Dermochelyidae), and although the association between these cirripedes and their chelonian hosts has existed for more than 30 million years, only a few studies have investigated the deep past of this iconic symbiotic relationship on palaeontological grounds. We describe probable platylepadid attachment scars in the form of hemispherical/hemiellipsoidal borings on an Upper Miocene (Tortonian) fragmentary turtle carapace, identified herein as belonging to Cheloniidae, from the Pisco Lagerstätte (East Pisco Basin, southern Peru). When coupled with the available molecular data, this and other similar ichnofossils allow for hypothesising that platylepadid symbionts were hosted by sea turtles as early as in early Oligocene times and became relatively widespread during the subsequent Miocene epoch. Chelonian fossils that preserve evidence of colonisation by platylepadid epibionts in the form of pits on the turtle shell should be regarded as fossil holobionts, i.e., palaeontological witnesses of discrete communal ecological units formed by a basibiont and the associated symbionts (including the epibiota). A greater attention to the bone modifications that may be detected on fossil turtle bones is expected to contribute significantly to the emerging field of palaeosymbiology.
... Shallow to deep pits have been noted on a number of fossil sea-turtles and have been variously attributed to tooth marks, bite marks, and the activity of post-mortem scavenging invertebrates (Milàn et al. 2011;Noto et al. 2012;Janssen et al. 2013;Myrvold et al. 2018;Jagt et al. 2020;De La Garza et al. 2021). Only rarely have bone modification features been attributed to invertebrates such as bivalves or barnacles (Misuri 1910;Karl et al. 2012;Hayashi et al. 2013;Janssen et al. 2013;Weems and Sanders 2014;Sato and Jenkins 2020). An ongoing problem is that although references to barnacle-induced bone medication features and barnacle embedment are common in the literature (e.g., Monroe and Limpus 1979;Monroe 1981;Flint et al. 2009;Frick et al. , 2011Hayashi 2013;Hayashi et al. 2013;Zardus 2021), only rarely have they been figured Collareta et al. 2022b), and they have not been described in detail. ...
... Several authors have interpreted circular pits on turtle skulls and shells on Oligocene and Miocene sea turtles as barnacle traces (e.g., Hayashi et al. 2013;Weems and Sanders 2014;Collareta et al. 2022b). These observations need to be supported with detailed descriptions of the pits, divots, and holes that may record barnacle history. ...
Article
Sea turtles are characterized by a wide variety of invertebrate ectoparasites. Few of these ectoparasites leave a permanent indication of their presence on the skeletal remains of their host taxa and thus represent ecological information doomed to be lost in the paleontological record. Some barnacle taxa provide an exception to this, in that they cause the formation of small, subcircular to circular divots, pits, and holes on the skull, mandible, carapace or plastron of sea turtles. Loggerhead Sea Turtle (Caretta caretta) skeletons from Cumberland Island, Georgia, USA were examined to assess the presence, frequency, and loci of occurrence of barnacle pits, and to establish which taxa are involved in pit development. Six types of divot and pit attributed to barnacles are identified in this study. Type I traces are shallow, oval/semi-circular in outline, with smooth, gently sloped bases. Type II traces are deep, hemispherical pits with smooth bases. Type III traces are deep, circular to subcircular pits with flat bases. Type IV traces are deep, circular to subcircular pits with multiple (4–6) small sub-pits on their bases. Type V traces are cylindrical, penetrative holes. Type VI traces comprise shallow ring-shaped grooves on the surface of the bone. Type I through III traces are identical to the ichnotaxon Karethraichnus lakkos. Type IV traces have not, as yet, been described in the rock record. Type V traces are identical to K. fiale. Type VI traces are identical to Thatchtelithichnus holmani.Barnacletaxaidentifiedas emplacing non-penetrative divots and pits on C. caretta skulls, mandibles, and shell bones include Chelonibia caretta (Type I), Platylepas hexastylos (Types I–IV), Calyptolepas bjorndalae (Types I and II), and Stomatolepas elegans (Types I and II). Type V traces were most likely emplaced by either Stephanolepas muricata or Chelolepas cheloniae. Type VI traces reflect the former attachment of balanid or lepadid barnacles. Embedded barnacles were observed in epidermal material associated with Types I through IV traces but not for Type V and VI traces and thus the relationship is inferred for these latter traces. Barnacle-related pits, divots, and holes are believed to result from barnacle mediated chemical corrosion into the outer surface of sea turtle bone. The occurrence of these traces provides one of the few preservable lines of evidence of barnacle interactions with sea turtle hosts. Identification of definitive barnacle borings in fossil material will provide evidence of the evolution of platylepadid barnacles and the development of their commensal relationship with chelonid turtles.
... Shallow to deep pits have been noted on a number of fossil sea-turtles and have been variously attributed to tooth marks, bite marks, and the activity of post-mortem scavenging invertebrates (Milàn et al. 2011;Noto et al. 2012;Janssen et al. 2013;Myrvold et al. 2018;Jagt et al. 2020;De La Garza et al. 2021). Only rarely have bone modification features been attributed to invertebrates such as bivalves or barnacles (Misuri 1910;Karl et al. 2012;Hayashi et al. 2013;Janssen et al. 2013;Weems and Sanders 2014;Sato and Jenkins 2020). An ongoing problem is that although references to barnacle-induced bone medication features and barnacle embedment are common in the literature (e.g., Monroe and Limpus 1979;Monroe 1981;Flint et al. 2009;Frick et al. , 2011Hayashi 2013;Hayashi et al. 2013;Zardus 2021), only rarely have they been figured Collareta et al. 2022b), and they have not been described in detail. ...
... Several authors have interpreted circular pits on turtle skulls and shells on Oligocene and Miocene sea turtles as barnacle traces (e.g., Hayashi et al. 2013;Weems and Sanders 2014;Collareta et al. 2022b). These observations need to be supported with detailed descriptions of the pits, divots, and holes that may record barnacle history. ...
Article
Sea turtles are characterized by a wide variety of invertebrate ectoparasites. Few of these ectoparasites leave a permanent indication of their presence on the skeletal remains of their host taxa and thus represent ecological information doomed to be lost in the paleontological record. Some barnacle taxa provide an exception to this, in that they cause the formation of small, subcircular to circular divots, pits, and holes on the skull, mandible, carapace or plastron of sea turtles. Loggerhead Sea Turtle (Caretta caretta) skeletons from Cumberland Island, Georgia, USA were examined to assess the presence, frequency, and loci of occurrence of barnacle pits, and to establish which taxa are involved in pit development. Six types of divot and pit attributed to barnacles are identified in this study. Type I traces are shallow, oval/semi-circular in outline, with smooth, gently sloped bases. Type II traces are deep, hemispherical pits with smooth bases. Type III traces are deep, circular to subcircular pits with flat bases. Type IV traces are deep, circular to subcircular pits with multiple (4–6) small sub-pits on their bases. Type V traces are cylindrical, penetrative holes. Type VI traces comprise shallow ring-shaped grooves on the surface of the bone. Type I through III traces are identical to the ichnotaxon Karethraichnus lakkos. Type IV traces have not, as yet, been described in the rock record. Type V traces are identical to K. fiale. Type VI traces are identical to Thatchtelithichnus holmani. Barnacle taxa identified as emplacing non-penetrative divots and pits on C. caretta skulls, mandibles, and shell bones include Chelonibia caretta (Type I), Platylepas hexastylos (Types I–IV), Calyptolepas bjorndalae (Types I and II), and Stomatolepas elegans (Types I and II). Type V traces were most likely emplaced by either Stephanolepas muricata or Chelolepas cheloniae. Type VI traces reflect the former attachment of balanid or lepadid barnacles. Embedded barnacles were observed in epidermal material associated with Types I through IV traces but not for Type V and VI traces and thus the relationship is inferred for these latter traces. Barnacle-related pits, divots, and holes are believed to result from barnacle mediated chemical corrosion into the outer surface of sea turtle bone. The occurrence of these traces provides one of the few preservable lines of evidence of barnacle interactions with sea turtle hosts. Identification of definitive barnacle borings in fossil material will provide evidence of the evolution of platylepadid barnacles and the development of their commensal relationship with chelonid turtles.
... The chronostrati-graphic distribution of the turtle barnacles is according to Collareta et al. (2022a, b, c and references therein). Question marks associated with the fossil record of the platylepadids indicate presumptive occurrences as witnessed by time-constrained trace fossils (Weems et al. 2014;Collareta et al. 2022b). The blue rectangle outlines the Rupelian cheloniid radiation phase and the corresponding episodes in the fossil history of turtle barnacles probable platylepadid attachment scars incising carapacial elements of Cheloniidae have been recently reported from the Oligocene and Miocene Weems and Sanders 2014;Collareta et al. 2022b), suggesting that platylepadids have a longer evolutionary history as epibionts of sea turtles than suggested by the body fossils alone. ...
... Question marks associated with the fossil record of the platylepadids indicate presumptive occurrences as witnessed by time-constrained trace fossils (Weems et al. 2014;Collareta et al. 2022b). The blue rectangle outlines the Rupelian cheloniid radiation phase and the corresponding episodes in the fossil history of turtle barnacles probable platylepadid attachment scars incising carapacial elements of Cheloniidae have been recently reported from the Oligocene and Miocene Weems and Sanders 2014;Collareta et al. 2022b), suggesting that platylepadids have a longer evolutionary history as epibionts of sea turtles than suggested by the body fossils alone. ...
Article
Full-text available
In contrast to other kinds of biological interactions, symbiosis is a scarcely investigated aspect of the fossil record. This is largely due to taphonomic biases that often frustrate any attempt to make a strong case that two organisms shared an intimate association in life. Among extant marine vertebrates, the sea turtles (Cheloniidae and Dermochelyidae) bear a broad and diverse spectrum of epibiotic symbionts, including specialists such as the turtle barnacles (Chelonibiidae and Platyleapa-didae). Here, we reappraise an early Oligocene (Rupelian) fossil cheloniid skeleton, featuring the remains of cirripedes on the exterior of its entoplastron, from the Rauenberg fossil-lagerstätte, southwestern Germany. The barnacle specimens are assigned to Protochelonibia melleni, an extinct protochelonibiine species and the geologically oldest known member of Chelonibiidae. In the light of taphonomic and palaeoenvironmental considerations, and given that the extant chelonibiids are mostly known as epizoic symbionts of sea turtles, we conclude that this unique fossil association resulted from the epizoic growth of the barnacles on the external surface of the plastron of the turtle during its lifetime. This remarkable fossil association provides evidence that chelonibiids, including the extinct protochelonibiines, have been chelonophilic epizoans for more than 30 Myr. A survey of the trace and body fossil records shows that platylepadids are also likely as old as the Rupelian as is their symbiotic association with cheloniid hosts. This early emergence of the modern-looking, turtle-dwelling barnacle lineages corresponds to a climate-driven phase of major radiation and taxonomic turnover among sea turtles at the Eocene-Oligocene transition.
... The majority of pancheloniids present a scute sulcus crossing the pygal at the midline, although it has been noted that several taxa don't exhibit this trait, such as the 'allopleurine' chelonioid Allopleuron hofmanni (Hirayama, 2007;Mulder, 2003;Jansen et al., 2011), the ctenochelyids Asmodochelys parhami (Gentry et al., 2019) and Peritresius martini , the stem cheloniid Mexichelys coahuilaensis (Brinkman et al., 2009) Garza et al., 2021) and Puppigerus camperi (Moody, 1974), and the Oligocene pancheloniids Procolpochelys charlestonensis (Weems & Sanders, 2014;Weems & Brown, 2017) and Carolinochelys wilsoni (Weems & Sanders, 2014;Weems & Brown, 2017). The lack of a scute sulcus crossing the pygal is known in dermochelyids such as the Cretaceous dermochelyids Mesodermochelys undulatus (Hirayama & Chitoku, 1996;Hirayama, 1997) and Corsochelys halinches (Zangerl, 1960), and all known protostegids (Zangerl, 1953a;Hirayama, 1997;Hirayama, 1998;Hooks III, 1998;Hirayama, 2006;Tong et al., 2006). ...
... The majority of pancheloniids present a scute sulcus crossing the pygal at the midline, although it has been noted that several taxa don't exhibit this trait, such as the 'allopleurine' chelonioid Allopleuron hofmanni (Hirayama, 2007;Mulder, 2003;Jansen et al., 2011), the ctenochelyids Asmodochelys parhami (Gentry et al., 2019) and Peritresius martini , the stem cheloniid Mexichelys coahuilaensis (Brinkman et al., 2009) Garza et al., 2021) and Puppigerus camperi (Moody, 1974), and the Oligocene pancheloniids Procolpochelys charlestonensis (Weems & Sanders, 2014;Weems & Brown, 2017) and Carolinochelys wilsoni (Weems & Sanders, 2014;Weems & Brown, 2017). The lack of a scute sulcus crossing the pygal is known in dermochelyids such as the Cretaceous dermochelyids Mesodermochelys undulatus (Hirayama & Chitoku, 1996;Hirayama, 1997) and Corsochelys halinches (Zangerl, 1960), and all known protostegids (Zangerl, 1953a;Hirayama, 1997;Hirayama, 1998;Hooks III, 1998;Hirayama, 2006;Tong et al., 2006). ...
Thesis
The locality of Bentiaba, in the Namibe Basin, Angola, is one of the richest and most diverse fossiliferous outcrops of the Southern Hemisphere regarding marine vertebrates, with the expeditions from the Project PaleoAngola recovering various taxa such as bony fishes, sharks, mosasaurs, plesiosaurs, pterosaurs, and sea turtles. Here I reported a new specimen of a stem cheloniid recovered from the Lower Maastrichtian of Bentiaba, consisting of post-cranial remains, including the shell, plastron, more than ten vertebrae, one coracoid, and one metatarsal bone. Phylogenetic analysis places the Bentiaba specimen within Euclastes, but morphological comparison with Euclastes postcranial reveals differences. Euclastes was previously reported to Bentiaba, based on skull and postcranial material, but without any species attribution. The phylogenetic analysis resulted in various unexpected results, such as the placement of presumed cheloniids, such as Eochelone brabantica and Procolpochelys grandaeva as stem-dermochelyids, Ctenochelys stenoporus placed outside of Ctenochelyidae, and instead inserted in a polytomy with the aberrant chelonioid Allopleuron hofmanni and the dubious taxon Lophochelys, and placing Protostegidae and Angolachelonia within Chelonioidea, nesting Angolachelonia as sister taxon with Stem-Cheloniidae.