Figure 4 - uploaded by Dirk Van de gaer
Content may be subject to copyright.
Simulated equilibrium wealth distribution with differing values of E 

Simulated equilibrium wealth distribution with differing values of E 

Similar publications

Article
Full-text available
This work assesses the changes in aggregate poverty and inequality that have taken place in Latin America during the past 26 years. With this objective, we put together the largest number of observations on income distribution for the region for the period 1970–1995. We find that poverty and inequality have not declined during the 1990s in spite of...
Article
Full-text available
Intra-city differences in tree cover are one way in which the urban divide physically manifests itself, adding a green component to the discussion of urban inequalities. I determined the canopy cover of Accra and its 76 neighbourhoods using the ‘dot method’ approach where random points are displayed on aerial photographs and categorised as located...
Article
Full-text available
The aim of this article is threefold. Firstly, to present income-based poverty and extreme poverty indicators for 2015, when the macroeconomic crisis led to a generalized deterioration affecting all areas and regions. The second aim is to discuss long-term evolution, emphasizing the period since 2004, when sustained improvement of income indicators...

Citations

... Equilibrium requires that the distribution function remains unchanged through the generations, so that F t−1 = F t = F * , for all t in (16). Cowell and Van de gaer (2017) show that the equilibrium distribution F * that satisfies this equation must take the form of a Pareto distribution: ...
... Consider a situation where the economy is in a long-run equilibrium with τ = 0: no bequest tax. Our first task is to simulate the long-run distribution of wealth given the parameter values we have just stated and following the dynamics explained in section 4 and set out in more detail in Cowell and Van de gaer (2017). The equilibrium distribution has a Paretian upper tail where equation (18) gives the equilibrium value of Pareto's α: for these parameter values we find α = 1.355 . ...
... The Gini coefficient corresponding to the Pareto tail alone -in other words for inequality among the rich in isolation -would take the value 0.5848 . But the equilibrium distribution is not Paretian throughout its support -see Cowell and Van de gaer (2017) for an explanation. The empirical approximation to this equilibrium distribution is depicted by the shaded histogram in Figure 1. ...