Figure 2 - uploaded by Oana Mitrea
Content may be subject to copyright.
Source publication
We should recognize that the general representation of mobile telephony is a rather difficult issue since the technology itself is changing at a high speed. New functions and features are continuously added so that mobile communication technology is never the same, having a fluid, changing face. Is the cell phone just a phone? Is it a computer? Or...
Citations
This work aims at describing and categorizing the Romanian linguistic terms
about anthropological features of physiognomy (including stable and acquired
characteristics), active facial expressions, and paralanguage. The impact of
mimic and paralanguage upon the person who receives the message during the
process of communication triggers an impressively extensive linguistic
inventory.
Our approch starts from the idea that any kind of human communication builds
its significance as a mnemotechnical process in which verbalization has the
most important role, no matter whether the verbal code is used in the actual
construction of the message which, in its turn, is sent through the adequate
channel, or whether we speak about the re-construction of mixed or non-verbal
messages through translations from one code into another during the process
of reception (decoding, interpretation and understanding).
Thus, although scientific approaches to this matter claim that the non-verbal
channels have an importance of 60% in the process of communication, the
meaning created in the mind of the person receiving the message is due
exclusively to the verbal element. Knowing the possibilities offered by language
to translate the non-verbal code, one can substantially contribute to the
optimization of communication, the solving of conflicts and the elimination of
the barriers connected with the process of coding or decoding the message.
