Figure 2 - uploaded by Abhishek Laddha
Content may be subject to copyright.
Source publication
Objective: To assess feasibility of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (RALRN) and inferior vena cava thrombectomy (IVCT) in treating renal tumours with level I–III IVC thrombi and to assess their outcomes.
Patients and methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of RALRN-IVCTs, involving four centres across India, from September 20...
Contexts in source publication
Context 1
... patient was placed in a supine steep Trendelenburg position. Six ports were placed, which included three robotic arms, camera and two assistant ports ( Figure 2). The dissection commenced with incision of the mesentery, thereby reflecting the bowel contents upwards. ...
Similar publications
Surgical management of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with inferior vena cava (IVC) thrombus is inherently complex, posing challenges for even the most experienced urologists. Until the mid-2000s, nephrectomy with IVC thrombectomy was exclusively performed using variations of the open technique initially described decades earlier, but since then severa...
Citations
... [5,7] In a study by Kishore et al., all patients had negative margins whereas in Kaag et al. positive surgical margin was seen in 8% of cases. [10,15] In our study 13 (36.1%) patients had positive margins among which nine patients had renal vein and IVC margin positivity in the Hewlett Packard Enterprise report. ...
... days, respectively, for midline abdominal approach and CPB. [7,15] The overall mortality rate in our study was 25.6% while mortality rate among different levels of VTT is mentioned in Table 1, (P = 0.094). The overall mortality ranges from 2.7% to 13% [ Table 3] in contemporary studies. ...
Objective:
The objective of the study is to describe the perioperative outcomes, disease-specific, and overall survival status in patients diagnosed with renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava (IVC) tumor thrombus.
Patients and methods:
We did a retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent radical nephrectomy along with IVC thrombectomy from the year 2013 to 2020. Mayo's classification was used to stratify the level of IVC thrombus. Demographic, perioperative, histopathology data, complications, and survival status were analyzed.
Results:
Total number of patients included in the study was 39, (Male: Female = 84.6%: 15.4%). Median age of patients was 58 (interquartile range [IQR] 50-63) years. Median size of renal tumor (in cms) was 9.5 (IQR 7.5-12), 8 (IQR 7-11.5), 8.5 (IQR 7-11.75), and 11 (IQR 9.5-11) (P = 0.998) in level 1,2,3, and 4 tumors, respectively. Clear cell variant was seen in 32 patients (82%) with R0 resection in 17 patients. Twelve patients (30.7%) had systemic metastasis on presentation. The overall mean survival time was 66.4 months with 95% confidence interval (CI) (52.4-80.5 months). Mean recurrence-free survival is 76 months with (63-90) CI of 95%. Mean survival in patients who presented with metastasis is 47 months with 95% CI (52.4-80.5). Perioperative mortality rate was 5.12% in this study.
Conclusion:
The tumor size does not have an influence on the progression of tumor thrombus into IVC. Significant difference in survival was observed between different levels of thrombus with high mortality in level four tumors.
Renal cell carcinoma accounts for two to three percent of adult malignancies and can lead to inferior vena cava (IVC) thrombosis. This condition can decrease the rate of 5-year survival for patients to 60%. The treatment of choice in such cases is radical nephrectomy and inferior vena cava thrombectomy. This surgery is one of the most challenging due to many perioperative complications. There are many controversial methods reported in the literature. Achieving the free of tumor IVC wall and the possibility of thrombectomy in cases of level III and level IV IVC thrombosis are two essential matters previously advocated open approaches. Nevertheless, open approaches are being replaced by minimally invasive techniques despite the difficulty of the surgical management of IVC thrombectomy. This paper aims to review recent evidence about new surgical methods and a comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches. In this review, we present the latest surgical strategies for IVC thrombectomy and compare open and minimally invasive approaches to achieve the optimal surgical technique. Due to the different anatomy of the left and right kidneys and variable extension of venous thrombosis, we investigate surgical methods for left and right kidney cancer and each level of IVC venous thrombosis separately.
Purpose:
Open radical nephrectomy with inferior vena cava thrombectomy (O-CT) is standard management for renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena caval thrombus. First reported a decade ago, robotic radical nephrectomy with caval tumor thrombectomy (R-CT) is a minimally invasive option for this disease. We aimed to perform a systematic review to assess the safety and feasibility of R-CT in terms of perioperative outcomes and compare the outcomes between R-CT and O-CT.
Materials and methods:
The PubMed®, Scopus®, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Web of ScienceTM databases were searched using the free-text and MeSH terms "renal cell carcinoma," "inferior vena cava," "thrombosis" or "thrombus," "robot" and "thrombectomy." Studies reporting perioperative outcomes of R-CT and studies comparing R-CT with O-CT were included. The review was done in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines.
Results:
The searches retrieved 28 articles describing R-CT, including 7 comparative studies. This systematic review included 1,375 patients, out of which 329 patients were in single-arm studies and 1,046 patients were in comparative studies. Of 329 patients who underwent R-CT, 14.7% were level I, 60.9% level II, 20.4% level III and 2.5% level IV thrombus. Operative time ranged from 150 to 530 minutes; blood transfusion was administered in 38.2% (126). The overall complication rate was 30.3% (99). R-CT, in comparison to O-CT, was associated with a lower blood transfusion rate (18.4% vs 64.3%, p=0.002) and a lower complication rate (14.5% vs 36.7%, p=0.005). Major complication and 30-day mortality rates were similar in both groups.
Conclusions:
R-CT has acceptable perioperative outcomes in carefully selected patients. Compared with O-CT, R-CT is associated with a lower blood transfusion rate and fewer overall complications. In experienced hands with carefully selected patients, R-CT is feasible and safe, with acceptable outcomes; however, selection bias limits definitive inference of these results, and optimal patient selection criteria remain to be described.
