Figure 1 - available via license: CC BY-NC-ND
Content may be subject to copyright.
Placement of suture button suspension at the time of thumb CMC arthroplasty. Posteroanterior view of the thumb after SBS for CMC arthroplasty, showing a well-placed suture button at the corner of the thumb metacarpal and flare of the index metacarpal base. The scaphometacarpal space is well-preserved.
Source publication
Purpose
Trapeziectomy with suture button suspensionplasty (SBS) to treat thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) arthritis has been proposed as an alternative to ligament reconstruction tendon interposition. There have been limited large-scale or long-term reports regarding SBS outcomes. Single-surgeon intermediate follow-up is reported.
Methods
We conducted...
Context in source publication
Context 1
... removes half of the arthritic joint, which alleviates arthritis-related pain. 1 Passing a suture bridge through the base of the thumb and index metacarpals suspends the thumb metacarpal, preventing proximal migration and abutment against the scaphoid without the need to procure a donor tendon for suspension and the morbidity associated with it ( Fig. 1). Studies supporting the efficacy of trapeziectomy with SBS are limited. Cadaveric studies showed that SBS provides equal, if not greater, maintenance of trapezial space height after trapeziectomy compared with LRTI. 6e8 In a study comparing trapeziectomy and flexor carpi radialis with abductor pollicis longus side-to-side tendon ...
Similar publications
p> Background : The purpose of this study is to assess the functional outcome of the cases with advanced thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) arthritis treated with trapeziectomy and ligament reconstruction tendon interposition (LRTI) in terms of visual analogue scale (VAS), disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) score, Kapandji score, range of m...
Citations
Purpose
Combined trapeziectomy and suture-button suspensionplasty (SBS) is a common and well-established surgical treatment for thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) osteoarthritis. Although short and mid-term follow-up studies have shown promising outcomes with patients retaining excellent range of motion and strength, long-term data are lacking. The aim of our study was to assess the long-term outcomes of patients who underwent SBS surgery for thumb CMC arthritis, with a minimum follow-up period of 10 years.
Methods
We evaluated 17 patients, at least 10 years after undergoing SBS surgery for thumb CMC arthritis. We measured grip and pinch strength, range of motion, and trapezial space height and compared it with the respective values measured on the routine postoperative 3-month follow-up visit. All patients have additionally completed the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire.
Results
The study included 11 women and 6 men with an average age of 60.3 ± 6.4 years and a mean follow-up of 137.4 ± 11.4 months after surgery. The mean Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score was 9 (range: 0–40.9) at the long-term follow-up, compared with 26.2 (range: 4.5–75) recorded 3 months after the surgery. Grip and pinch strengths were 116% and 111% of the 3-month postoperative value, respectively. Radial abduction and palmar abduction were 98% and 94% of the 3-month postoperative value, respectively. Kapandji scores were either equal or higher than the previously documented scores. Average height of the trapezial space was 69% of the previous postoperative measurement.
Conclusions
Our findings demonstrate that patients who underwent SBS surgery for thumb CMC osteoarthritis achieve excellent long-term outcomes by maintaining favorable subjective and objective results, despite some radiographic subsidence over time. These results indicate SBS to be an effective and durable technique for the long-term management of thumb CMC osteoarthritis.
Type of study/level of evidence
Therapeutic IV.
Learning objectives:
After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Comprehend anatomy and biomechanics of the normal and arthritic trapeziometacarpal joint. 2. Evaluate best evidence for diagnosis and for operative and nonoperative treatment of thumb osteoarthritis. 3. Understand treatment pitfalls of basilar joint arthritis and complication avoidance.
Summary:
Articular and ligamentous anatomy of the trapeziometacarpal joint enables complex motions. Disability from arthritis, common at the trapeziometacarpal joint, is debilitating. Furthering the understanding of how trapeziometacarpal arthritis develops can improve treatment. The authors provide current best evidence for diagnosis and treatment of basilar joint arthritis. Pitfalls in treatment are discussed.
Purpose
The first carpometacarpal (CMC) joint is a frequent location of osteoarthritis in the hand. The denervation of the first CMC joint has gained traction as a viable treatment for CMC arthritis. This study reviewed literature on CMC denervation for first CMC arthritis.
Methods
A systematic review of papers and abstracts was conducted. The preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines were followed. Articles including the results of CMC denervation were included. We compiled data on patient demographics, preoperative testing, intraoperative technique, and postoperative outcomes. Anatomic literature was also reviewed to assess agreement on the innervation of the first CMC joint.
Results
Six anatomic studies and 9 clinical studies were included in this systematic review. Pinch strength, grip strength, and Kapandji scores increased on average in patients. Pain relief was noted on average in patients in 5 studies that reported pain outcomes. In studies that reported postoperative complications, the most frequent complications were radial paresthesias, hypoesthesia dorsal and/or distal to the surgical site, and wound infection.
Conclusions
The innervation of the CMC joint is controversial. This is reflected in clinical practice, wherein varied surgical approaches are used. Carpometacarpal denervation shows promise as an option to treat patients with CMC arthritis without joint instability, but its results vary. Additional clinical studies with longer-term follow-up and control groups are necessary to better determine its longevity and efficacy.
Type of study/level of evidence
Therapeutic V.
This study aimed to compare the results of patients treated with a thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) suspension arthroplasty using an interference screw technique with patients that were treated by trapeziectomy and ligament reconstruction. A retrospective chart review was conducted of patients over 18 years old who required surgical treatment for thumb CMC joint arthritis treated by a single surgeon. Patients included in the study followed the same preoperative and postoperative protocol. Information related to functional outcomes was collected (pinch and grip strength, pain, Kapandji score, proximal migration of first metacarpal bone). One hundred and five patients were included, 77% were female, age at the time of the study was 62.7 years old; 74 (70%) patients were treated with the tenodesis screw (TS) technique and 31 (30%) with trapeziectomy and ligament reconstruction (TZLR). Patients were followed for a mean of 8.4 months. Postoperative pain was 1.2 in the TS group and 0.6 in the TZLR group; Kapandji score was 8.3 in the TS group and 9 in the TZLR group; in the TS group, the grip strength was 26.2 kg and key pinch strength was 6.15 kg; in the TZLR group, grip strength was 12.8 kg and key pinch strength was 4.7 kg. Proximal migration was 0.4 cm in the TZLR group and 0.6 cm in the TS group. The use of tenodesis screw and half of the flexor carpi radialis had minor advantages, such as increasing the grip and key pinch strength without differences relative the non-operated thumb, minimal migration of the first metacarpal bone compared with the other technique.
