Fig 21 - uploaded by Julien Puylaert
Content may be subject to copyright.
Pitfall. Secondary thickening of the ileum caused by appendicitis. If the prominent ileum is appreciated, but the inflamed appendix ( arrow ) is overlooked, an erroneous diagnosis of Crohn’s disease or infectious ileocolitis can be made, leading to surgical delay. 

Pitfall. Secondary thickening of the ileum caused by appendicitis. If the prominent ileum is appreciated, but the inflamed appendix ( arrow ) is overlooked, an erroneous diagnosis of Crohn’s disease or infectious ileocolitis can be made, leading to surgical delay. 

Source publication
Article
Full-text available
Although multislice, helical CT is increasingly replacing ultrasonography for the evaluation of patients with acute abdominal pain, ultrasound does have certain specific advantages over CT. This article discusses the advantages of ultrasound in imaging of the acute abdomen, exploring such areas as appendicitis, ileocecal Crohn's disease, infectious...

Context in source publication

Context 1
... immediate appendectomy is advisable, even if the patient is again completely free of symptoms at that time. Histology in such cases confirms acute inflammation. If conservative management is opted for, keep in mind that there is a recurrence rate of approximately 40% [8]. Patients who are admitted with considerable delay may present with a palpable mass and relatively mild peritonitis. In these patients, who usually have a high erythrocyte sedimentation rate, US shows a large mass of noncompressible fat around the appendix, inter- spersed with echolucent streaks. These patients are diagnosed as ‘‘appendiceal phlegmon’’ and are usually managed conservatively because the surgeon knows that appendectomy in such cases is technically difficult or even impossible [9]. In some patients, the surgeon might be uncertain about the right policy: immediate operation or conservative management. In these cases the clinical symptoms prevail over the US image. If treated conservatively, follow-up US shows a decrease in size of the appendiceal phlegmon within the course of weeks (Fig. 16). If next to the inflamed appendix a fluid collection is found, this is suggestive for an appendiceal abscess. The collection often contains air and is surrounded by inflamed noncompressible hyperechoic tissue representing omentum and mesentery and secondarily thickened neighboring bowel loops, attempting to seal-off the abscess from the peritoneal cavity. If an appendiceal abscess is demonstrated and there is no frank peritonitis, percutaneous drainage is the treatment of choice (Fig. 17). In stable patients who have no fever and only mild pain, it is wise to await spontaneous drainage of the abscess to neighboring bowel. Finally, there are some patients with an appendiceal abscess who are better off with immediate surgery: this goes in general for children and for those patients with severe peritonitis, which indicates that the walling-off process is failing. Immediate surgery also is indicated for patients who have a small abscess with a history of only a few days of symptoms, in whom appendectomy with evacuation of the abscess is usually technically easy (Fig. 18). Before percutaneous drainage, CT is necessary to delineate the extent of the abscess and to determine the safest access route. If expertise is available in US- guided puncture, the combination US plus fluoroscopy has several advantages over CT-guided drainage: it is rapid, allows continuous control, any angulation, and can be performed as a bedside procedure. A false-positive diagnosis can be made if the normal appendix is mistaken for an inflamed one. Not infrequently the normal appendix is larger than 7 mm, especially in children when caused by lymphoid hyperplasia and in adults when caused by fecal im- paction. Appendiceal compressibility, the absence of a Doppler signal, and the absence of inflamed fat are the most important features in deciding if it is normal or inflamed. Mistaking a normal appendix for an inflamed one may also occur if there is secondary thickening of the appendix associated with cecal carcinoma. In the latter case, the appendiceal lumen is obstructed giving rise to sterile accumulation of mucus in the lumen. The patient often has remarkably mild symptoms and is managed conservatively under the erroneous diagnosis of an appendiceal phlegmon. If the underlying tumor is small and is not recognized, this may lead to considerable delay in surgical treatment. The combination of a relatively large appendix with paradoxically mild and atypical symptoms should raise suspicion of underlying malignancy. Other conditions with secondary thickening of the appendix are perforated peptic ulcer, Crohn’s disease, and sigmoid diverticulitis. The most important reason for a false-negative ultrasound examination is overlooking the inflamed appendix. In experienced hands the inflamed appendix can be visualized in 90% of patients with acute appendicitis. Generalized peritonitis hampers graded compression, which may account for a lower score in patients with free appendiceal perforation. Air-filled dilated bowel loops from adynamic ileus may hide the appendix from view. Air in the lumen can make it difficult to identify the inflamed appendix (Fig. 19). Another pitfall is demonstration of the normal proxi- mal part of the appendix while the distal inflamed tip is overlooked, because it is obscured by bowel gas. Rarely, the inflamed appendix has a maximal diameter of less than 7 mm. In those cases rigidity, hyper- vascularity, and the presence of inflamed fat must give the clue (Fig. 20). Another pitfall is advanced appendicitis where there is secondary wall thickening of the ileum. Often the ileal thickening is more prominent and conspicuous on US than the underlying inflamed appendix. If only the ileum is appreciated and the appendix is overlooked, an erroneous diagnosis of infectious ileocolitis or Crohn’s disease can be made, leading to ill- advised surgical delay (Fig. 21). Similarly, if in an adult patient enlarged mesenteric lymph nodes are the sole US finding, one should be cautious to diagnose mesenteric lymphadenitis because these nodes could be secondarily enlarged because of acute appendicitis, while the inflamed appendix is overlooked. If in a patient with appendicitis only the fecalith in the appendiceal base is visualized and the rest of the appendix is overlooked, this may lead to an erroneous diagnosis of cecal diverticulitis. If in a woman a relatively large right-sided ovarian cyst is found, this is not necessarily the cause of her symptoms and one should still search for appendicitis. Finally, if in advanced appendicitis only the hyperechoic noncompressible inflamed fat of omentum and mesentery is visualized, and the inflamed appendix is overlooked, this may lead to an erroneous diagnosis of omental infarction or epiploic appendagitis [10,11]. In patients with equivocal US findings, CT scan is indicated. A fortunate circumstance is that these are often obese patients. Patients with ileocecal Crohn’s disease often have protracted and atypical symptoms causing marked diagnostic delay. Crohn’s disease may also present with acute, appendicitis-like symptoms and lead to an ill-advised operation. In both scenarios US may play an important role in establishing the initial diagnosis [12,13]. The sensitivity of US for detecting ileocecal Crohn’s disease is over 95%. Sonographically, there is marked mural thickening of the ileum, which shows decreased or no peristalsis and is not compressible. Classically, all layers are involved and layer structure is often locally disturbed, the earliest sign being echolucent changes in the submucosa. There is inflammation of the fatty mesentery and omentum, recognizable as hyperechoic, noncompressible tissue adjacent to the ileum. In the echolucent wall bright eccentric foci may indicate deep ulceration. Echolucent streaks within the hyperechoic tissue indicate liponecrotic tracts, which may herald fistula formation. Cecum and appendix may also show mural thickening. Mesenteric lymph nodes are often markedly enlarged, but hypovascular. In long-standing Crohn’s disease, ‘‘creeping fat’’ is found, which is recognized as a large, moderately well-compressible fatty mass encompassing most of the circumference of the ileum and isoechoic to normal fat. Eventually, there are often US signs of prestenotic dilatation, abscess formation, or fistula formation (Figs. 22, 23). Infectious ileocolitis is a bacterial infection of terminal ileum and colon, which is characterized by diarrhea and abdominal pain. The most frequently cultured bacteria are Campylobacter , Salmonella , and Yersinia . The infection is generally limited to the mucosa, is self-limiting, and rarely poses diagnostic problems. There is an interesting variant of infectious ileocolitis in which the infection is mainly limited to the ileocecal area and has been termed ‘‘infectious ileoce- citis’’ [14]. It is usually caused by the same bacteria and the importance of this variant is that its clinical symptoms are dominated by acute right lower abdominal pain, whereas diarrhea is absent or only mild. These symptoms masquerade as the clinical signs of appendicitis and explain why infectious ileocecitis often leads to an unnecessary laparotomy. The symptoms of Yersinia are often more protracted and both the clinical symptoms and the US features may mimic those of Crohn’s disease. The absence of a transmural component, the self-limiting course, and positive stool cultures or serology yield the correct diagnosis. The frequency of infectious ileocecitis is fairly high and has a ratio of 1 to 8 compared with appendicitis [14]. An US shows fairly characteristic features: there is diffuse thickening of mucosa and submucosa of the terminal ileum and the cecum and enlargement of mesenteric lymph nodes (Fig. 24). The appendix is so- nographically normal. In contrast to ileocecal Crohn’s disease, in infectious ileocecitis the wall layers are always intact and the muscularis and serosa are never affected. Omentum and mesentery are never involved and there are never signs of bowel obstruction or abscess or fistula formation. The various microorga- nisms have a slightly different pattern of affecting the ileocecal area (Fig. 25). This is an ill-defined entity, probably of viral origin, in which the mesenteric lymph nodes become inflamed and enlarged. It is a typical disease of childhood and is only rarely seen in young adults. It mimics the clinical signs of appendicitis and may lead to an unnecessary appendectomy. The US findings are solely enlarged, hypervascular mesenteric lymph nodes. If these are the only US findings in a symptomatic young adult, however, it is well possible that these nodes are in fact secondarily enlarged because of acute appendicitis and the inflamed appendix is overlooked. Patients with cecal carcinoma can present with acute or subacute abdominal symptoms in ...

Citations

... Moreover, data regarding the use of computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonography (US) for diagnosis of acute abdominal pain to decrease the negative appendectomy rate are conflicting (Douglas et al., 2000;Flum et al., 2005). Most researches support CT as a better modality than US in this regard (The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, 2007;Puylaert, 2003). However, although CT is the most sensitive imaging technique to detect urgent conditions in patients with abdominal pain, US can be used first, with subsequent use of CT only in patients with negative or inconclusive findings from US, resulting in best sensitivity and lowering the exposure to radiation . ...
... However, although CT is the most sensitive imaging technique to detect urgent conditions in patients with abdominal pain, US can be used first, with subsequent use of CT only in patients with negative or inconclusive findings from US, resulting in best sensitivity and lowering the exposure to radiation . Several centers prefer to use US as the primary imaging modality because it is easily accessible and avoids unnecessary exposure to ionizing radiation (Gaitini et al., 2008;Protection, 2007;Puylaert, 2003;van Randen et al., 2008;The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological). ...
Article
Full-text available
Background/Aim: One of the most common emergency department (ED) presentations and pediatric abdominal surgery causes is acute appendicitis. Imaging is crucial to management since clinical evaluation might be erroneous. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of computed tomography (CT) compared with ultrasonography (US) in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in a Saudi population. In addition, the study sought to evaluate the improvement of diagnostic accuracy when a complementary CT is added after inconclusive results of US. Methods: Retrospective study involved 225 patients who were referred from the ED and underwent diagnostic US and/or CT for possible acute appendicitis. Of these 225 patients, US was performed for 82, CT for 83, and both US and CT for 60 patients, before surgery. Results: Accuracy of CT (84.33%) was higher than US (56.09%). Specificity and negative predictive value (NPV) of US were higher than CT. In contrast, sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV), and accuracy were better for CT than US. For patients who underwent both US and CT, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis demonstrated that US sensitivity was 70% and specificity was 63.2% and CT sensitivity was 75.3% and speci-ficity was 80.1%. Conclusion: Although CT is more accurate and sensitive than US for diagnosing acute appendicitis, US can still be used as the primary imaging modality due to its high specificity. In turn, CT may be reserved for the patients who have a clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis and negative US results. This approach may reduce the radiation exposure to ~50% of patients presenting with acute appendicitis in the ED.
... In cases of suspected appendicitis, it is recommended to search the inflamed appendix at the point of the greatest abdominal pain, pointed out by the patient, using graded compression [43]. Alternatively, a systematic approach involving the localization of terminal ileum, cecum and the origin of the appendix, 2-3 cm below the caecum, can be used [2]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Acute bowel diseases are responsible for more than one third of subjects who were referred to the emergency department for acute abdominal pain and gastrointestinal evaluation. Gastrointestinal ultrasound (GIUS) is often employed as the first imaging method, with a good diagnostic accuracy in the setting of acute abdomen, and it can be an optimal diagnostic strategy in young females due to the radiation exposure related to X-ray and computed tomography methods. The physician can examine the gastrointestinal system in the area with the greatest tenderness by ultrasound, thus obtaining more information and data on the pathology than the standard physical examination. In this comprehensive review, we have reported the most relevant indications and advantages to using ultrasound in the investigation of abdominal acute pain.
... Recently, the efficacy of transabdominal US has been reported [2,[12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31], and the World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology [32] and the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (EFSUM) have published guidelines on GIUS [1,[33][34][35][36][37][38][39]. However, in the EFSUM guidelines, the stomach is not included, and neither a precise scanning procedure nor typical normal GIUS findings are well documented. ...
Article
Full-text available
The standard diagnostic modalities for gastrointestinal (GI) diseases have long been endoscopy and barium enema. Recently, trans-sectional imaging modalities, such as computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, have become increasingly utilized in daily practice. In transabdominal ultrasonography (US), the bowel sometimes interferes with the observation of abdominal organs. Additionally, the thin intestinal walls and internal gas can make structures difficult to identify. However, under optimal US equipment settings, with identification of the sonoanatomy and knowledge of the US findings of GI diseases, US can be used effectively to diagnose GI disorders. Thus, the efficacy of GIUS has been gradually recognized, and GIUS guidelines have been published by the World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology and the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. Following a systematic scanning method according to the sonoanatomy and precisely estimating the layered wall structures by employing color Doppler make diagnosing disease and evaluating the degree of inflammation possible. This review describes current GIUS practices from an equipment perspective, a procedure for systematic scanning, typical findings of the normal GI tract, and 10 diagnostic items in an attempt to help medical practitioners effectively perform GIUS and promote the use of GIUS globally.
... Over the past few years, technological advances have improved the ability of ultrasonography to detect and monitor illnesses. 3 In this study, we compared ultrasound with CT in detecting causes of Common stomach and bowel pathologies such as appendicitis, diverticulitis, volvulus in patients presenting at the department with acute abdominal pain in the majority of cases. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background-In this study we compared ultrasound with CT in detecting causes of Common stomach and bowel pathologies such as appendicitis, diverticulitis, volvulus in patients presenting at the department with acute abdominal pain in the majority of cases. Methods- A cross-sectional study was conducted in our institute from September 2019 to August 2021 following approval from the Ethical committee of the hospital. All clinically suspected lesions involving stomach and bowel patients included patients who were clinically evaluated at OPD & the emergency department by the surgeon. All those who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were explained the purpose of the study. After clinical assessment, all consenting patients underwent ultrasound and computed tomography (CT) within a few hours of presentation. Results- A total of 100 patients with stomach and bowel disorders were studied using ultrasound and multidetector CT scan. 25 patients were diagnosed with appendicular pathologies, 25 cases with primary neoplasms, 18 were abdominal Koch’s, 17 were Crohn’s disease, 6 were ulcerative colitis, 4 were volvulus, 3 were diverticulitis, 2 were intussusception.Acute appendicitis was the most frequent finding seen in 23 patients. Ultrasound was diagnostic in all except one case.
... Another study carried out by Harinath et al. in 30 patients comparing both USG and CT in the evaluation of abdominal masses concluded that the CT was more sensitive than USG in demonstrating the morphological features of abdominal masses like echogenicity, vascularity, density, contrast enhancement characters, tumoral necrosis, calcifications, presence or absence of fat, regional lymphadenopathy, infiltration into the adjacent structures and distant metastase [8] . Advantage of USG over MDCT was that, USG is easily accessible and there is no exposure to ionizing radiations in USG as compared to MDCT [21] . However, USG is dependent on the proficiency of the operator, which could impact its diagnostic utility [3] . ...
... Imaging modalities, such as ultrasound and computed tomography (CT) are frequently used to diagnose patients with acute abdomen. Ultrasound is currently considered the primary imaging modality for acute abdomen in children by many clinicians, due to its low cost, fast and easy accessibility, and favorable safety profile (3,4). Children are non-cooperative and their clinical findings are almost ambiguous (5). ...
... Duplication cysts can occur anywhere from the esophagus to the rectum, but most are located in terminal ileum. In ultrasonography, they appear as fluid-filled cysts with gut signature sign (echogenic inner mucosal layer and hypoechoic muscular layer), which differentiates them from other intraperitoneal cysts (3,6,7,21). ...
Article
Full-text available
Acute abdomen is a major cause of pediatric hospitalization that can represent a variety of conditions, some of which carrying a high risk of complications. Ultrasonography is usually the primary diagnostic method and provides quick aid in decision-making for the surgeons. It is cardinally important to follow a logical and comprehensive approach in ultrasound examination of children with acute abdomen, to reduce the chance of diagnostic pitfalls and prevent unnecessary delays in surgical interventions. However, there is still controversy regarding the best starting point and the optimal sequence of ultrasonography. In this review, we have summarized the most relevant literature regarding the ultrasonography of acute abdomen in the pediatric population by reviewing the most common causes of acute abdomen that require intervention and lead to complications in this age group. We conclude that ultrasound examination through a systematic approach focusing on terminal ileum and mesenteric vessels can aid timely diagnosis of the most important etiologies and expedite the management of critically ill patients.
... Acute enterocolitis cases in which https://pghn.org https://doi.org/10.5223/pghn.2021.24.2.127 the inflammation is confined to the ileum and cecum are called ileocecitis, and most of these cases are caused by infection in these areas by bacteria such as Yersinia enterocolitica, Campylobacter jejuni, and Salmonella enteritidis [13][14][15]. Acute enterocolitis can be diagnosed based on enlarged ileocecal area and normal appendix [16,17], and some cases may show appendiceal infection as well [18]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Purpose: In patients with acute enterocolitis, radiologic findings are sometimes accompanied by secondary inflammation of the appendix. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical features of acute enterocolitis with secondary inflammation of the appendix. Methods: Medical records from patients who underwent abdominal ultrasonography or computed tomography (CT) among those admitted for acute enterocolitis were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical features were compared by distinguishing patients with inflammation of the appendix from those without, based on their symptoms and laboratory findings. Results: Of the 165 patients, 12 (7.3%) had secondary inflammation of the appendix on ultrasonography and/or CT. Patients with secondary inflammation of the appendix were significantly older than those without (11.7 vs. 6.1 years, p=0.011) and more frequently had fever (83.3% vs. 49.0%, p=0.033), and high values of C-reactive protein (CRP) (5.38 vs. 0.32 mg/dL, p<0.001). The proportion of bacterial pathogens was higher in patients with secondary inflammation of the appendix (60% vs. 15.1%, p=0.004). Conclusion: Patients with acute enterocolitis accompanied by secondary appendicitis more commonly have fever, higher CRP levels, higher bacterial pathogen detection rates, and longer hospital stays. Treatment equivalent to that of bacterial infection is required for patients with secondary appendicitis, and that their symptoms should be closely and continuously monitored and followed-up.
... Su hallazgo ecográfico característico es el engrosamiento mural simétrico del íleon terminal 1 . Dependiendo del agente etiológico, los cambios inflamatorios de la mucosa pueden extenderse al ciego, apéndice y colon derecho. ...
... The technique of bowel US consists first in an evaluation with a curvilinear 3,5-5 MHz transducer and, if depicting an abnormality, switching to the linear or curved high frequency probe (7,(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13), to have a more detailed image. If the patient can localize the pain, the examination can begin there. ...
... The technique of bowel US consists first in an evaluation with a curvilinear 3,5-5 MHz transducer and, if depicting an abnormality, switching to the linear or curved high frequency probe (7,(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13), to have a more detailed image. If the patient can localize the pain, the examination can begin there. ...
... Las excepciones son el estómago, que puede medir hasta 6 mm, el antro pilórico y el recto (hasta 7 mm). En ausencia de patología, el sigma puede mostrar hipertrofia de la muscular y alcanzar hasta 5 mm de grosor 2,5,21,22 . ...
Article
Full-text available
Ultrasound is being increasingly used to study the digestive tract because it has certain advantages over other techniques such as endoscopy, CT enterography, and MR enterography. Ultrasound can be used to evaluate the bowel wall and the elements that surround it without the need for contrast agents; its ability to evaluate the elasticity and peristalsis of these structures is increasing interest in its use. This article describes the techniques and modalities of bowel ultrasound, as well as the normal features of the bowel wall and contiguous structures. It uses a practical approach to review the main pathological findings and their interpretation, and the different patterns of presentation, which will help orient the diagnosis.