Fig 10 - uploaded by Pavel Yurievich Pavlov
Content may be subject to copyright.
Photo of the excavation at Byzovaya showing the surface of the fi nd bearing strata with some large mammoth bones that were draped and covered by aeolian sand. 

Photo of the excavation at Byzovaya showing the surface of the fi nd bearing strata with some large mammoth bones that were draped and covered by aeolian sand. 

Source publication
Article
Full-text available
We review geo-archaeological results from six Palaeolithic sites along the western flank of the northern Ural Mountains. The oldest traces of human activities, dated to around 36–35 14C ka BP (43–40 cal ka), were found in alluvial strata at Mamontovaya Kurya at the Polar Circle - their connection to cultures further south remains uncertain. Slightl...

Context in source publication

Context 1
... to our OSL-dating this greyish silt accumulated at around 69 Æ 4 ka BP (Table S2). Above the soil complex follows 4 e 5 m of yellowish-brown silt with a nearly massive structure and a vertical cleavage, interpreted as primary loess. Mainly due to colour variations it was possible to distinguish three discrete sub-units along the section. The lower- most sub-unit is yellowish brown, the middle is greyish brown and the uppermost is light brown. The OSL- and TL-results indicate that the two lower loess units accumulated between 70 and 50 ka BP (MIS 4/early MIS 3, Table S2). The two upper loess units are sepa- rated by a thin soil horizon that corresponds with the investigated fi nd bearing layer in both excavations (I and II, Fig. 8). In general, the fi nd bearing deposit is less than 20 cm thick and it occurs in the same stratigraphic position as the thin soil mentioned above. The enclosing sediment consists of fi ne-grained aeolian silt. In addition to a high concentration of stone artefacts some poorly preserved horse and reindeer bones were found in this zone. A single radiocarbon date, conducted on charcoal from a charcoal concentration (hearth?) in excavation II, provided an age of 28.8 Æ 0.8 14 C ka BP (31.5 e 33.0 cal ka, Table S1). An OSL sample from the fi nd layer in excavation I yielded an age of 37 Æ 2 ka BP whereas a TL date from approximate the same level in the cliff some 10 m further to the south gave a nearly similar age of 38 Æ 5 ka BP (Fig. 8, Table S2). The archaeological materials from the two excavations are nearly identical and probably of similar age. The primary fl aking technique is characterized by fl at, parallel cores. Flakes form the dominant type of blank; there are virtually no tools or blades. The assemblage contains a high frequency of scrapers; in particular many with a characteristic sub-triangular shape and a ventral retouch (Fig. S4). However, circular ones with retouch along the perimeter of the blank are also common. Among the tools there are also quite a few characteristic bifacial triangle projectiles with concave or straight bases (Fig. S4). The fi nd distribution within the excavated areas has been interpreted as re fl ecting the former presence of dwelling structures that included fi re places (Fig. 9). According to our classi fi cation the stone artefacts represent a typical Kostenki/Streletskaya, or Sungirian complex from the well-known site in the Moscow region (Pavlov, 2008). It should be noted that Pavlov et al. (2004) reported a small number of previous fi nds of stone artefacts with a Middle Palaeolithic character collected at the base of the cliff, but believed to originate from the lower soil complex that according to our OSL dating was developed during MIS 5. Such an early occupation of this area by Middle Palaeolithic hominines would imply a signi fi cant range expansion to the north, compared to current views. Hence, we extensively searched for artefacts in these MIS 5 strata (soil) during the 2005 fi eldwork, but without any positive results. Therefore, this site should henceforth not be used in discussions on the geographic range of Middle Palaeolithic humans. The site Byzovaya (65 01 N; 57 25 E) is situated at the right bank of the Pechora River, about 2 km to the east of the village Byzovaya and 11 km upstream of Pechora City (Fig. 1). The fi nd bearing formation, which is exposed in a bluff along the river, is covered by up to 10 meters of Quaternary sediments. Palaeolithic artefacts were fi rst discovered here in 1962, and since then the locality has been investigated several times (Kanivets, 1976). We carried out fi eld investigations in 1996, 1997 (Mangerud et al., 1999; Heggen, 2000) and lastly in the year 2000. In all more than 300 artefacts and as many as about 4000 animal remains have been uncovered during the various excavations (Tables 1 and 2). However, about 1300 pieces of animal remains from one of the fi rst excavations were lost in a boat accident on the river in 1965. We partly studied the “ classical ” fi nd spot investigated by previous investigators. However, in 1997 and 2000 we cleared the vegetated (partly with trees) and higher cliff some 50 m down-river with a bulldozer and by hand-digging (Heggen et al., 2010; Svendsen et al., 2008). Here we found a more complete stratigraphy, thicker sediment cover above the bones and artefacts, and the animal remains were better preserved than those from the earlier excavations (Figs. 10 e 12). The formation with bones and artefacts is up to 2.5 m thick and rests directly on Triassic sandstone on the fl oor of a palaeo- gully that leads to the Pechora River (Fig. 12). The sediments, which consist of vaguely strati fi ed sandy gravel, are interpreted to be the result of a series of debris fl ows. Both artefacts and animal remains were found throughout the debris fl ow sequence, but there were also many well-preserved bones and mammoth tusks resting on the very surface of this formation (Fig. 10). Mammoth constitutes more than 97% of the identi fi ed animal remains, but there are also remains of woolly rhino ( Coleodonta antiquitatis ), musk ox ( Ovibos moschatus ), bear ( Ursus sp.), horse ( E. ferus ), reindeer ( R. tarandus ) and several small animals (Table 2). As many as 33 radiocarbon dates of the animal remains are available this formation, some of them with human made cut marks. Most of the dates have provided ages in the range 27 e 30 14 C ka BP (Slimak et al., submitted for publication). The debris- fl ow deposits are covered by an up to 3 m thick sediment unit that consist of planar laminated, well sorted fi ne sand, interpreted as an aeolian deposit (Fig. 12). The sand, which partly inter- fi ngers with the debris fl ow formation, drapes the bones and tusks that lie on the surface of the latter unit. Four OSL- dates from this sand unit gave ages in the range 33 e 30 ka BP whereas 8 dates the overlying strata gave younger ages in the interval 24 e 15 ka BP (Heggen et al., 2010). The stone artefacts include fl akes, scrapers and some plano- convex bifacial tools (Pavlov et al., 2004). A more comprehensive technological analysis of the material is recently completed (Slimak et al, submitted for publication). Medvezhia Peshera (62 05 N; 58 05 E) is located in a rock shelter near the sources of the Pechora River on the western slope of the northern Urals (Fig. 1). The site was discovered by B.I. Guslitser and V.I. Kanivets in 1960 and it was excavated by them in 1960 e 1962 and later by Pavlov in 1982 e 1984 (Guslitser and Kanivets, 1965; Guslitser and Pavlov, 1992). The excavated area is located on the gentle slope just outside the entrance of the overhanging cliff. The total thickness of the strata above bedrock varies from 2.5 to more than 6 m (Fig. 13). A total area of about 184 m 2 were uncovered and numerous bones and about 1500 artefacts were unearthed (Table 1). We have not visited the site during the fi eld work reported on here. The basal layer is brown clay covered by a thin layer of precip- itated sinter. The bulk part of the sediment column above is interpreted as slope deposits. The fi nd-layer occurs within a one meter thick layer of brownish-grey, sandy loam that also contains a concentration of limestone rubble (Bed B in Fig. 13). The artefacts are concentrated in a 3 e 5 cm thick layer within the sandy loam. The faunal remains from the cultural layer are dominated by reindeer, but mammoth, cave bear ( Ursus spelaeus ), woolly rhinoceros, horse, arctic fox and collard lemming ( Discrostonyx torquatus ) were also identi fi ed (Table 2) (Kuzmina, 1971). Three radiocarbon dates on animal remains from the layer that contain artefacts yielded ages of 18.7 Æ 0.2, 18.0 Æ 0.2 and 16.1 Æ 0.2 14 C ka BP respectively (23.2 e 18.9 cal ka, Table S1). Four radiocarbon dates of bones that were recovered from the sediments just above the cultural layer yielded somewhat younger ages in the range 13.2 e 11.8 14 C ka BP (Table S1). The artefact assemblage is characterized by a blade technology based on knapping of prismatic cores (Fig. S7). The main blank type is a short blade, but there are also micro blades. Truncated blades predominate among the tools. The other categories represented are some small end-scrapers on blades, side scrapers and partly bifacial knives on tabular blanks. The bone inventory is rather poor, but some fragments of inserted points made from mammoth ivory were found. This is the northernmost Palaeolithic site that has been investigated by us. It is situated (67 10 0 N; 60 51 0 E) about 140 km to the west of the coal mining city Vorkuta, on the tundra along the stream Pymva Shor, a small tributary to the river Adzva that empties into the Usa River (Fig. 1). Pymva Shor is known for the presence of a unique hot spring that prevents the stream from freezing during the winter season and that may have attracted animals and humans to the area. The stream runs through a 30 m deep narrow valley that is entrenched into a limestone plateau. The sediments from this site were sieved. Artefacts were found only in excavations on a bedrock ledge about 20 m above the present river, just in front of a steep cliff with a small cave (Pymva Shor I, Fig. 14). Here numerous animal remains and a few stone artefacts were found during the archaeological excavations in 1994, 1995 (Mangerud et al., 1999; Svendsen et al., 2008). Some additional geological fi eld work was carried out in 1998. A small excavation (Pymva Shor II, not shown in the fi gure) was also done in the same valley some 300 m further upstream, but only bones were found at this place. The rodent fauna from these excavations was described by Smirnov and Golavachov (1999) and the remaining fauna will be described in a separate paper headed by A.K. Hufthammer. The bone assemblage includes horse, musk ox, reindeer, bison, hare, arctic fox and various rodents, as well as a large number of bird species and some fi shes ...

Similar publications

Research
Full-text available
Table des matières Sortir à Paris : Néandertal, la grande expo au Musée de l'Homme 2 La Croix : Découverte d’un site paléolithique de 500 000 ans en Israël 4 PLOS Paleo Community : Fossil Friday Roundup: January 5, 2018 5 El Watan.com : Passion, attraction touristique 8 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP Interdisciplinary Approaches to the Study of Human and M...

Citations

... A single artifact of this age was found in the layer 10 of the Cheremukhovo Cave, pit 1(which has a radiocarbon date 31,500 ± 1200 RP (AA-36470), 26,480 ± 840 RP (OxA-10926) and 25,150 ± 500 RP (SOAN-5302) (Strukova et al., 2006), which corresponds to the Marine Isotope Stage 3 (MIS 3) or the end of the Nev'yansk horizon. Finds from the Medvezhaya Cave have a completely different age (16,130 ± 150, LE-3060;17,980 ± 200, LE-2876;18,700 ± 180, GIN-8399), indicating that humans were also present along the Urals in the beginning of the Last Glacial Transition, right after the Last Glacial Maximum (Guslitser and Pavlov, 1988;Svendsen et al., 2010), in the beginning of the Polar Urals horizon or in the beginning of MIS 2. Two caves (Uninskaya and Studenaya) yielded rare artifacts dated to the second half of the Upper Palaeolithic (Guslitser and Pavlov, 1988). ...
... Additionally dates on bones from alluvial localities were involved in order to determine the time of extinction of these species more exactly . Data on the extinction of these species in neighboring territories were also included (Svendsen et al., 2010;Gimranov and Kosintsev, 2022). U. ex gr. ...
... The valleys provided sufficient vegetation to allow the first Paleolithic hunters to penetrate beyond the Arctic Circle as early as ca. 40 ka BP (Svendsen et al., 2010). Most finds of mammoth fauna belong to this large and cold, basically treeless interstadial ca. ...
... A similar pattern is also observed in layer 6 of the Pymva-Shor area (Fig. 9) located 600 km north of the Iordanskogo Ravine. The age range of different horizons in layer 6 varies from 13 to 21 14 С ka (Smirnov et al., 1999;Svendsen et al., 2010), and according to the latest published radiocarbon dating from the collared lemming bones, it varies from 15408-15946 to 25707-26807 cal. years ago (Palkopoulou et al., 2016). ...
... The Urals, forming the natural boundary between the East European Plain and the West Siberian Lowland (Fig. 1), is still a poorly known area in terms of Palaeolithic peopling in spite of its strategic geographic location. This mountain region transected by the East-West oriented valleys have the principal bearing for the study of the early human dispersal into the broader eastern loess-covered plains of southern Siberia as well as the northern sub-Arctic territories (Petrin, 1986;Maschenko et al., 2006;Svendsen et al., 2010;Chlachula, 2019). A progressive cultural development during the Late Pleistocene culminated in the formation of specific Upper Palaeolithic cultural entities in the mountains as well as the eastern foothills of the Ural Mountains, and the adjoining open plains (Serikov, 2000) following a poorly documented Middle Palaeolithic human presence (Serikov and Chlachula, 2014). ...
... The Urals, forming the natural boundary between the East European Plain and the West Siberian Lowland (Fig. 1), is still a poorly known area in terms of Palaeolithic peopling in spite of its strategic geographic location. This mountain region transected by the East-West oriented valleys have the principal bearing for the study of the early human dispersal into the broader eastern loess-covered plains of southern Siberia as well as the northern sub-Arctic territories (Petrin, 1986;Maschenko et al., 2006;Svendsen et al., 2010;Chlachula, 2019). A progressive cultural development during the Late Pleistocene culminated in the formation of specific Upper Palaeolithic cultural entities in the mountains as well as the eastern foothills of the Ural Mountains, and the adjoining open plains (Serikov, 2000) following a poorly documented Middle Palaeolithic human presence (Serikov and Chlachula, 2014). ...
Article
Stone and bone artefacts serving as expedient food-procurement and processing implements are the principal and most frequent findings at Palaeolithic sites. Utilitarian art items, often aesthetically fashioned artefacts, are much less common. Emergence of cognitive art within the broader Ural region was determined by progressive cultural developments and adaptations of anatomically modern human beings to mosaic mountain settings and parkland-steppes. At the Urals’ Late Pleistocene cave sites, objects, which were made frequently of unusual and rare materials and are presumed to be of a ritual nature, are represented by adornments and artworks bearing stylized pictorial images. Zoomorphic figurines produced from flint and mammoth ivory document the high skills of Stone Age artisans. The earliest, utilitarian, art-related works of the Urals include sculptures using natural pre-forms such as river pebbles and animal bones, occasionally ochre-painted or ornamented by incising or engraving. Personal decorations are represented by pendants and beads made of stone, shell, bone, and teeth of animals. Rare exemplars are made from material of non-local provenance, such as petrified wood or segments of fossil sea-lily (crinoids) and are indicators of a broad geographic activity-range and/or regional interactions among local groups of hunter-gatherers. Artisanal instruments associated with rock art, for example, lamps made from stone and clay as well as pieces of ochre, belong to a specific category. Aesthetic-looking minerals with appealing colours and textures, such as serpentine, rock crystal, chalcedony, and jasper, it may be assumed, were intended for religious or cultic purposes, but also may have been curated simply because of their natural rarity. These art-related items likely had symbolic value and spiritual meaning apart from purely decorative function. Understanding utilitarian art objects offers insights to every-day life of the Palaeolithic people of the Urals, and their behavioural and environmental adjustments, which culminated in multifarious, iconographic expressions at the end of the Last Glacial stage.
... The age of 40.7-39.7 ka cal BP (68.2% prob.) of Kostenki 1 Layer V North is likely the most accurate chronometric estimation of an early Streletskian context (Dinnis et al., 2021). The production of Streletskian leaf points persisted later in time and is found at Garchi I and Byzovaya (34-32 ka cal BP) in the western slopes of the Northern and Central Ural Mountains (Svendsen et al., 2010), at Birioutchia Balka 2 layer 3 in the lower Seversky Donets Valley (Matioukhine, 1998), at Buran-Kaya III level C (42-40 ka cal BP) in Crimea (Monigal, 2004), and at Sungir (34-32 ka cal BP) in the Vladimir region (Nalawade-Chavan et al., 2014). ...
Chapter
Homo sapiens evolved in Africa during the late Middle Pleistocene, dispersed to South-East and East Asia at c. 100 ka BP, and only at c. 50 ka BP crossed the gates of Europe. Thus far, the European archaeological data suggest consecutive waves of migrations of H. sapiens from the Levant and both along the Danube River and the Mediterranean coast. The earliest dispersal reached Bulgaria and Moravia as well as southern Europe at ~ 47–44 ka BP, whereas another wave diffused rapidly between ~ 44 and 42 ka BP to Central Europe and the Western Mediterranean. In concomitance of these migrations, new cultural behaviours emerged in the European territories and, at ~ 41–39 ka BP, Neanderthals, the autochthonous European population, demised. The foremost consequence of these displacements in different territories and environments is that H. sapiens lasted as the only human species on Earth.
... Стоянки второй хронологической группы (около 29 тыс. 14 С л. н.), относятся к финалу MIS3 (брянский интерстадиал среднего валдая) (GI5-H3): Бызовая (бассейн Печоры) и Гарчи I (бассейн верхней Камы) (Pavlov et al. 2001;2004;Павлов 2008;Svendsen et al. 2010). ...
... Комплексные полевые исследования этих памятников проводились в рамках нескольких международных и российских научных проектов (Pavlov et al. 2004;Павлов 2008;Svendsen et al. 2010). На стоянках, расположенных в бассейне верхней Камы (Гарчи I и Заозерье), насыщенные культурные слои сохранились практически in situ. ...
... Образцы для радиоуглеродного датирования были проанализированы в лабораториях Гронингена, Познани, Трондхейма, Санкт-Петербурга и Москвы. Образцы на OSL датирование были проанализированы в скандинавской Лаборатории люминесцентного датирования (Университет Орхус, Дания) (Svendsen et al. 2010). ...
Article
Full-text available
The article discusses the materials of the Early Upper Paleolithic sites of Zaozer’e, Garchi I and Byzovaya situated in the northeast of the East European plain and on the Urals (58—67°N; 50—60°E), in the Pechora and Upper Kama river basins. In this region, two episodes of initial human occupation are recognizable. The first (Zaozer’e site, 35—33 kyr BP) may represent the earliest penetration of anatomically modern humans into the north of Europe, while the second one (Garchi I and Byzovaya sites, ca. 29 kyr BP) can be associated with the migration of some Streletskian populations to the northeast of the European continent. The available ecidence seems to indicate the cultural and chronological unity in the development of Paleolithic culture in the center and the northeast of the East European plain and on the Urals in the first half of the Upper Palaeolithic.
... Together, these are thought to span a long period of time (Anikovich 1977a(Anikovich , 1992(Anikovich , 2005Praslov and Rogachev 1982;Bradley et al. 1995;Haesaerts et al. 2017). Streletskian assemblages have also been found at Biriuch'ia Balka 2 in Rostov Oblast (Matyukhin and Sapelko 2009;Matyukhin 2012), Garchi 1 in the Urals (Pavlov 2010;Svendsen et al. 2010) and Vys' in Ukraine (Zaliznyak et al. 2008(Zaliznyak et al. , 2013Zaliznyak and Belenko 2011). Although not always referred to explicitly as 'Streletskian', other Russian assemblages have been linked culturally to Streletskian assemblages, notably Sungir' and Layer III of Kostenki 11 (Popov 1989;Anikovich 1992Anikovich , 2001Anikovich -2002Bradley et al. 1995;Sinitsyn 2010;Dinnis et al. 2018) (Fig. 1). ...
Article
Full-text available
The Streletskian is central to understanding the onset of the Upper Palaeolithic on the East European Plain. Early Streletskian assemblages are frequently seen as marking the Neanderthal-anatomically modern human (AMH) anthropological transition, as well as the Middle-to-Upper Palaeolithic archaeological transition. The age of key Streletskian assemblages, however, remains unclear, and there are outstanding questions over how they relate to Middle and Early Upper Palaeolithic facies. The three oldest Streletskian layers—Kostenki 1 Layer V, Kostenki 6 and Kostenki 12 Layer III—were excavated by A. N. Rogachev in the mid-20th century. Here, we re-examine these layers in light of problems noted during Rogachev’s campaigns and later excavations. Layer V in the northern part of Kostenki 1 is the most likely assemblage to be unmixed. A new radiocarbon date of 35,100 ± 500 BP (OxA- X-2717-21) for this assemblage agrees with Rogachev’s stratigraphic interpretation and contradicts later claims of a younger age. More ancient radiocarbon dates for Kostenki 1 Layer V are from areas lacking diagnostic Streletskian points. The Kostenki 6 assemblage’s stratigraphic context is extremely poor, but new radiocarbon dates are consistent with Rogachev’s view that the archaeological material was deposited prior to the CI tephra (i.e. >34.3 ka BP). Multiple lines of evidence indicate that Kostenki 12 Layer III contains material of different ages. Despite some uncertainty over the precise relationship between the dated sample and diagnostic lithic material, Kostenki 1 Layer V (North) therefore currently provides the best age estimate for an early Streletskian context. This age is younger than fully Upper Palaeolithic assemblages elsewhere at Kostenki. Other “Streletskian” assemblages and Streletskian points from younger contexts at Kostenki are briefly reviewed, with possible explanations for their chronostratigraphic distribution considered. We caution that the cultural taxon Streletskian should not be applied to assemblages based simply on the presence of bifacially worked artefacts.
... Quaternary geology, geoarchaeology and palaeontology investigations conducted in the Yana, Indigirka and Kolyma Basins produced new palaeoecology data and early cultural records detailing the temporal framework and environmental contexts of the Late Pleistocene and Early Holocene inhabitation of these geographically remote areas (Bezusko et al. 2008;Basilyan et al. 2011;Pitulko 2011Pitulko , 2013Cheprasov et al. 2015Cheprasov et al. , 2018Pitulko et al. 2016, Pitulko et al. 2017) linked to parallel studies in the northern Urals (Svendsen & Pavlov 2003;Astakhov & Svendsen 2008;Svendsen et al. 2010). The main issues of the current research remain the recognition of the archaeological occurrences in the cryolithic contexts and the age of the unearthed cultural implements made from organic (bone, tusk, wood) materials, together with the palaeoenvironmental assessment of early human adaptive capabilities to the past (sub)arctic ecosystems. ...
Article
Full-text available
The Kolyma region is historically famous for the unique finds of large Pleistocene fauna, yet, until very recently, absent of the time‐corresponding occupation sites. Quaternary geology and palaeontology investigations (2013–2019) in the middle reaches of the Kolyma River (NE Yakutia) have delivered new evidence on the Last Glacial (MIS 4–2) to Early Holocene sub‐arctic ecosystems and the past landscape dynamics retrieved from the fossiliferous bodies exposed from thawed grounds. The palaeoecology multi‐proxies from the MIS 3 (55–24 ka) cryolithic formations document riparian, larch‐dominated northern forests and open parklands with backwater channels, marshlands and lakes. The abundant skeletal remains of Pleistocene ungulates and carnivores, as well as relic flora point to long‐term biomass‐rich interstadial ecosystems and favourable Palaeolithic occupation habitats. Utilized animal bones, worked mammoth ivory and stone tools show the presence of pre‐modern humans in the northeast Russian Arctic >45 000 years ago. Flaked mammoth tusks suggest persistence of settlement during the Last Glacial Maximum in xeric and extremely cold (sub)arctic tundra. The postglacial climate shifts triggered major environmental and hydrological transformations. The final Pleistocene/Early Holocene warming brought restructuring of the Last Ice Age landscape and vanishing of the periglacial tundra‐steppe replaced by the present‐day larch‐dominated Siberian taiga. The mid‐Last Glacial human ecology records from the geographical limits of northeast Siberia have fundamental relevance for the reconstructions of the time trajectories and the natural conditions of peopling of Beringia.
... The warmer period leading up to the Laschamps in the Northern Hemisphere locations might also explain why the archaeological record appears to indicate that multiple Arctic sites were occupied by AMH populations relatively rapidly after the 50-55 ka colonization of Eurasia. The cold conditions following Laschamps, including Heinrich Event 4, leading into the LGM, may have limited the ability of AMH to survive at such northern sites e.g. the Russian early paleolithic site of Mamontovaya Kurya (136). ...
Article
Full-text available
Supplementary Material for 'A global environmental crisis 42,000 years ago' Geological archives record multiple reversals of Earth’s magnetic poles, but the global impacts of these events, if any, remain unclear. Uncertain radiocarbon calibration has limited investigation of the potential effects of the last major magnetic inversion, known as the Laschamps Excursion [41 to 42 thousand years ago (ka)]. We use ancient New Zealand kauri trees (Agathis australis) to develop a detailed record of atmospheric radiocarbon levels across the Laschamps Excursion. We precisely characterize the geomagnetic reversal and perform global chemistry-climate modeling and detailed radiocarbon dating of paleoenvironmental records to investigate impacts. We find that geomagnetic field minima ~42 ka, in combination with Grand Solar Minima, caused substantial changes in atmospheric ozone concentration and circulation, driving synchronous global climate shifts that caused major environmental changes, extinction events, and transformations in the archaeological record.