Figure 2 - uploaded by Susanne Fuchs
Content may be subject to copyright.
Participant watching (confederate silent). The effect of the confederate's physical effort on the confederate's and participants' breathing while both were in silence. The circles represent the regression models' estimates, and the error bars represent their standard errors. Light B. = Light Biking; Heavy B. = Heavy Biking.
Source publication
Purpose
This study investigated whether speakers adapt their breathing and speech (fundamental frequency [ f o ]) to a prerecorded confederate who is sitting or moving under different levels of physical effort and who is either speaking or not. Following Paccalin and Jeannerod (2000), we would expect breathing rate to change in the direction of the...
Contexts in source publication
Context 1
... breath cycle duration becoming linearly shorter with increases in physical effort. This and the following results concerning quiet breathing are visualized in Figure 2, which displays the regression model's estimate values for each condition. The error bars correspond to the model's standard error. . ...
Context 2
... breath cycle duration was longer during Light Biking than in the other conditions (see coefficients in Table 2). The results concerning read speech are visualized in Figure 3, which, as in Figure 2, displays the model's estimates and standard error. ...
Context 3
... is, we attempted to replicate Paccalin and Jeannerod's (2000) finding of breathing adaptation, but with a different experimental setup. As Figure 2 displays, the participants' breathing cycle duration did not change significantly across conditions (all |t| < 1.68). Their inhalation amplitude, however, was significantly lower in the Heavy Biking condition as compared to the Sitting condition. ...
