Figure 32 - uploaded by René ter Haar
Content may be subject to copyright.
PM Solutions' Project Portfolio Management Maturity Model (PMS-PPMMM) adapted from: http://pmsolutions.com The Project Management Process Maturity Model In 1997 Ibbs and Kwak of the University of California at Berkeley developed the initial version of the Project Management Process Maturity (PM) 2 model. In 2002 a more comprehensive version appeared of the (PM) 2 model which is also known as the Berkeley Project Management Process Maturity Model. The (PM) 2 model breaks project management processes and practices into nine project management knowledge areas and five project management processes by adopting PMI's PMBOK Guide. The project processes are initiating, planning, executing, controlling, and closing. The knowledge areas are project integration management, project time management, project scope management, project cost management, project quality management, project communication management, project human resources management, project risk management, and project procurement management. Figure 33 represents the (PM) 2 model which consists of five maturity levels: level 1: Ad-hoc, level 2: Planned, level 3: Managed at project level, level 4: Managed at corporate level, and level 5: Continuous learning. In level 1 there is a basic project management process, but there are no formal plans or procedures to execute projects. Organizations at this stage are functionally isolated and are unfamiliar with the project management concept or the project-oriented organizational structure. In level 2 informal and incomplete procedures are used to manage a project and planning and management of projects depend on individuals. Organizations at this stage are more teamoriented than in level 1. In level 3 project management processes are becoming partly formal and demonstrate a basic project planning and control system. Organizations in this stage focus on systematic and structured project planning and control. In level 4 project management processes are formal and information and processes are documented.

PM Solutions' Project Portfolio Management Maturity Model (PMS-PPMMM) adapted from: http://pmsolutions.com The Project Management Process Maturity Model In 1997 Ibbs and Kwak of the University of California at Berkeley developed the initial version of the Project Management Process Maturity (PM) 2 model. In 2002 a more comprehensive version appeared of the (PM) 2 model which is also known as the Berkeley Project Management Process Maturity Model. The (PM) 2 model breaks project management processes and practices into nine project management knowledge areas and five project management processes by adopting PMI's PMBOK Guide. The project processes are initiating, planning, executing, controlling, and closing. The knowledge areas are project integration management, project time management, project scope management, project cost management, project quality management, project communication management, project human resources management, project risk management, and project procurement management. Figure 33 represents the (PM) 2 model which consists of five maturity levels: level 1: Ad-hoc, level 2: Planned, level 3: Managed at project level, level 4: Managed at corporate level, and level 5: Continuous learning. In level 1 there is a basic project management process, but there are no formal plans or procedures to execute projects. Organizations at this stage are functionally isolated and are unfamiliar with the project management concept or the project-oriented organizational structure. In level 2 informal and incomplete procedures are used to manage a project and planning and management of projects depend on individuals. Organizations at this stage are more teamoriented than in level 1. In level 3 project management processes are becoming partly formal and demonstrate a basic project planning and control system. Organizations in this stage focus on systematic and structured project planning and control. In level 4 project management processes are formal and information and processes are documented.

Citations

... The history of project maturity models goes back to the year 1991, the first project maturity model, the Capability Maturity Model (CMM), which was founded by the Software Engineering Institute "SEI" (AXELOS, 2019). Some of the maturity models, through comparison conducted by Haar, also cover the plan or portfolio as well as the project (Haar, 2008). He talked about the portfolio management history of Gliedman in 2002 and has shown how to meet the needs of a portfolio manager through existing tools. ...
... Among the project maturity models, Haar lists PPMMM-PM Solution, P3M3, and OPM3 models for project and portfolio comparisons (Haar, 2008). Erling S. Anderson ،Svein Arne Jessen model is another model that is appropriate for project, program, and portfolio (Andersen, 2003). ...
... In 2005, PMS provided a maturity model for the project and portfolio (Haar, 2008). This model was developed by PM Solutions. ...
Conference Paper
Full-text available
In project-oriented organizations, many projects are being implemented using shared resources. Given the high volume of investments, organizations are looking for ways to improve performance and stay on the scene. Therefore, applying project management is considered necessary. Maturity models are introduced, utilizing the best global experiences for the organization, to evaluate and display the existing status of portfolios and provide solutions to improve them. This paper introduces the maturity models of portfolio management projects and compares them. These four models are Erling S. Andersen Svein Arne Jessen model, PM Solutions-PPMMM model , P3M3 model and OPM3 maturity model .