Figure 1 - uploaded by Brian Martin
Content may be subject to copyright.
NGC 7603 is a Seyfert galaxy of redshift 8,700 km/sec. The companion attached to the arm has a red shift of 17,100 km/sec. Two quasar like objects of 72,900 and 117,300 km/sec have been discovered in this arm by López-Corredoira and Gutiérrez.
Source publication
Nobody should have a monopoly of the truth in this universe. The censorship and suppression of challenging ideas against the tide of mainstream research, the blacklisting of scientists, for instance, is neither the best way to do and filter science, nor to promote progress in the human knowledge. The removal of good and novel ideas from the scienti...
Similar publications
‘Post-truth politics’, particularly as manifested in ‘fake news’ spread by countermedia, is claimed to be endemic to contemporary populism. I argue that the relationship between knowledge and populism needs a more nuanced analysis. Many have noted that populism valorises ‘common sense’ over expertise. But another populist strategy is counterknowled...
Citations
... One can also recall all those classical theorems of traditional mathematics about the uniqueness of solutions and objects for major structures, problems, and equations to see the huge degree of difference of real-world mathematics from its conventional simplification. At the same time, it is important to note that the new mathematics of real-world complexity [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]11,27] comes as the explicit extension of conventional schemes, including their (modified) dynamically single-valued branches but also many other, dynamically produced ones. ...
... It becomes clear why no universal definition of complexity can be obtained within the conventional, dynamically single-valued mathematical description of reality left with hugely incomplete, external imitations of both complexity and chaoticity/randomness (the unreduced complexity is always zero in this case, ( ) 10 C = ). The same is true for many related features and notions of the traditional framework, including nonintegrability (absence of a "closed", unique solution), nonseparability, noncomputability (genuine dynamic randomness), uncertainty (indeterminacy), undecidability, stochasticity, broken symmetry, free will, etc., which acquire their consistent and universal meaning within the unreduced, dynamically multivalued picture of reality [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. ...
... The persisting old and increasingly appearing new mysteries, dark matters, hidden dimensions, and various other "hard" problems of traditional, unitary science framework provide very visible manifestations of this glaring gap between the over-simplified theory and complex-dynamic reality, culminating now in the deep crisis of official, unitary science, with the emerging destructive tendencies in the planetary civilisation development (instead of the new progress within the unreduced complexity paradigm [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]). But as the obviously failing, artificially restricted doctrine of conventional science persists in its absolute domination and massive, technologically sophisticated experiments (e.g. ...
We show that critically accumulating "difficult" problems, contradictions and stagnation in modern science have the unified and well-specified mathematical origin in the explicit, artificial reduction of any interaction problem solution to an "exact", dynamically single-valued (or unitary) function, while in reality any unreduced interaction development leads to a dynamically multivalued solution describing many incompatible system configurations, or "realisations", that permanently replace one another in causally random order. We obtain thus the universal concept of dynamic complexity and chaos impossible in unitary mathematics. This huge difference between the unreduced mathematics of real-world dynamics and strongly limited unitary "models" of traditional mathematics inevitably induces a growing series of "unsolvable" problems and other "mysteries" that culminate now in the crisis of the "end of science", where the stagnating unitary "science" in question includes only the described limitation of the traditional mathematical framework (unfortunately accepted as the unique possible basis for any scientific knowledge). In this brief review, we show that science extension to the unreduced, dynamically multivalued mathematics of the intrinsically complex real-world dynamics provides stagnating problem solutions and reconstitution of the intrinsic causality and unity of science desperately missing in its artificially limited unitary framework. Painful stagnation of the latter should be replaced now by the unlimited new progress of the extended, causally complete knowledge of the universal science of complexity, which provides the urgently needed issue from the current impasse of the global civilisation development.
... The idea was that scientists could post pre-prints of not-yet-published papers that would immediately be available to scientists worldwide. It was a great idea, but from the beginning there were allegations of blacklisting by the operators of the archive [13]. ...
U. S. President Donald J. Trump is leading America and the world against the elitist-globalist goal of a One World Government. His efforts to free American entrepreneurs from unwarranted control by others are producing an economic renaissance. From a lifetime of first-hand knowledge and experience, I describe the problems that beset American science, and posit solutions for producing the cutting-edge science that Trump’s economic renaissance requires.
... The fundamentally emergent character and dynamic origin of all observed entities and laws of their behaviour in the universal science of complexity [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] includes the unified complex-dynamical and totally causal, physically real origin of all "quantum" and "relativistic" properties of elementary particles and their agglomerates in larger bodies [1,[3][4][5][6], in contrast to inexplicable "mysteries", abstract "principles", and related "paradoxes" of standard, unitary quantum theory and relativity, leading to their irreducible separation and unsolvable problems in applications. Whereas large and abrupt changes of dynamic complexity (e. g. of a particle) account for quantum leaps and other quantum phenomena, gradual and smooth evolution of the same dynamic complexity measures (like energy or momentum) in motion processes appear as "relativistic effects", thus dynamically explained and intrinsically unified with quantum complexity manifestations by the underlying well-specified and physically real basis of unreduced interaction (in this case between two primordial protofields). ...
Unified and causal complex-dynamic origin of standard (special and general) relativistic and quantum effects revealed previously at the lowest levels of world interaction dynamics is explicitly generalised to all higher levels of unreduced interaction processes, thus additionally confirming the causally complete character of complex-dynamical, naturally quantised relativity, which does not contain any artificially added, abstract postulates. We demonstrate some elementary applications of this generalised quantum relativity at higher levels of complex brain and social interaction dynamics.
... When, for personal or professional reasons, scientists collectively engage in practices contrary to long-held principles of scientific behaviour [1,2], doing so with the expectation of political power, financial or social status, their outlook is not that of an open scientific community, but of a science cartel. A science cartel is an association of producers of scientific knowledge that maintains a 'consensus' about a scientific hypothesis (such as the anthropogenic carbon dioxide global warming hypothesis) by restricting competition. ...
... A change of that scale, starting from the "end" (increasing stagnation and growing contradictions) of traditional, unitary science (see [20][21][22][23][24] and references therein), cannot occur just by "greater efforts" of the same kind and definitely asks for deep and well-specified revolutionary changes in science content, organisation, purposes and social role. Indeed, even apart from its glaring "end", the conventional, positivistic and unitary (dynamically single-valued) fundamental science has finally failed to initiate the promised "knowledge-based society", inserting itself instead in the modern huge machine of traditional, profit-based society as its minor professional component of vanishing popularity, which is also oriented to personal profits instead of knowledge progress and loses increasingly even that, shamefully miserable status (being replaced by technology, or purely applied science structures and interests). ...
... Indeed, even apart from its glaring "end", the conventional, positivistic and unitary (dynamically single-valued) fundamental science has finally failed to initiate the promised "knowledge-based society", inserting itself instead in the modern huge machine of traditional, profit-based society as its minor professional component of vanishing popularity, which is also oriented to personal profits instead of knowledge progress and loses increasingly even that, shamefully miserable status (being replaced by technology, or purely applied science structures and interests). The necessary transition to genuine sustainability corresponds to a quite different kind of development directly based on and guided by the rigorous, provably complete scientific understanding of all its essential aspects and directions, realising thus what we call reason-based, or conscious, society, where the new, intrinsically creative, causally complete and totally consistent kind of scientifically objective knowledge of real-world complexity constitutes the true basis of progress and the centre of natural social interest [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]20]. ...
... In order to fully understand the difference between those two kinds of knowledge, which leads inevitably to the ultimate scientific revolution [20], we should take into account the accompanying historical key features of knowledge development [1], where the maximum possible simplification of reality within the dynamically single-valued paradigm of unitary science is closely related to the equally simplifying general approach of the dominating positivistic empiricism insisting, since Newtonian "hypotheses non fingo", on the exclusive effectiveness of that huge simplification, with practically forbidden searches for causally complete, strongly "ontological" and truly consistent explanations. What matters in this approach is the formal correspondence between a subjectively chosen "main" part of observations and a proposed abstract "model", with the underlying physical reasons for that correspondence, always remaining essential deviations, unsolvable "mysteries" and glaring contradictions between different "models" being left apart as unnecessary "philosophy" preserved sometimes only for its own sake, as a kind of luxury decoration on top of otherwise "perfect" formal "modelling". ...
The deep crisis in modern fundamental science development is ever more evident and openly recognised now even by mainstream, official science professionals and leaders. By no coincidence , it occurs in parallel to the world civilisation crisis and related global change processes , where the true power of unreduced scientific knowledge is just badly missing as the indispensable and unique tool for the emerging greater problem solution and further progress at a superior level of complex world dynamics. Here we reveal the mathematically exact reason for the crisis in conventional science, containing also the natural and unified problem solution in the form of well-specified extension of usual, artificially restricted paradigm. We show how that extended, now causally complete science content provides various "unsolvable" problem solutions and opens new development possibilities for both science and society, where the former plays the role of the main, direct driver for the latter. We outline the related qualitative changes in science organisation, practice and purposes, giving rise to the sustainability transition in the entire civilisation dynamics towards the well-specified superior level of its unreduced, now well understood and universally defined complexity.
... The fundamentally emergent character and dynamic origin of all observed entities and laws of their behaviour in the universal science of complexity [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] includes the unified complex-dynamical and totally causal, physically real origin of all "quantum" and "relativistic" properties of elementary particles and their agglomerates in larger bodies [1,[3][4][5][6], in contrast to inexplicable "mysteries", abstract "principles", and related "paradoxes" of standard, unitary quantum theory and relativity, leading to their irreducible separation and unsolvable problems in applications. Whereas large and abrupt changes of dynamic complexity (e. g. of a particle) account for quantum leaps and other quantum phenomena, gradual and smooth evolution of the same dynamic complexity measures (like energy or momentum) in motion processes appear as "relativistic effects", thus dynamically explained and intrinsically unified with quantum complexity manifestations by the underlying well-specified and physically real basis of unreduced interaction (in this case between two primordial protofields). ...
11 pages, 17 eqs, 17 refs; Published as section 8.3 of the book: A. P. Kirilyuk, Theory of Everything, Ultimate Reality and the End of Humanity: Extended Sustainability by the Universal Science of Complexity (LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing, Beau Bassin, 2017)
... A change of that scale, starting from the "end" (increasing stagnation and growing contradictions) of traditional, unitary science (see [20][21][22][23][24] and references therein), cannot occur just by "greater efforts" of the same kind and definitely asks for deep and well-specified revolutionary changes in science content, organisation, purposes and social role. Indeed, even apart from its glaring "end", the conventional, positivistic and unitary (dynamically single-valued) fundamental science has finally failed to initiate the promised "knowledge-based society", inserting itself instead in the modern huge machine of traditional, profit-based society as its minor professional component of vanishing popularity, which is also oriented to personal profits instead of knowledge progress and loses increasingly even that, shamefully miserable status (being replaced by technology, or purely applied science structures and interests). ...
... Indeed, even apart from its glaring "end", the conventional, positivistic and unitary (dynamically single-valued) fundamental science has finally failed to initiate the promised "knowledge-based society", inserting itself instead in the modern huge machine of traditional, profit-based society as its minor professional component of vanishing popularity, which is also oriented to personal profits instead of knowledge progress and loses increasingly even that, shamefully miserable status (being replaced by technology, or purely applied science structures and interests). The necessary transition to genuine sustainability corresponds to a quite different kind of development directly based on and guided by the rigorous, provably complete scientific understanding of all its essential aspects and directions, realising thus what we call reason-based, or conscious, society, where the new, intrinsically creative, causally complete and totally consistent kind of scientifically objective knowledge of real-world complexity constitutes the true basis of progress and the centre of natural social interest [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]20]. ...
... In order to fully understand the difference between those two kinds of knowledge, which leads inevitably to the ultimate scientific revolution [20], we should take into account the accompanying historical key features of knowledge development [1], where the maximum possible simplification of reality within the dynamically single-valued paradigm of unitary science is closely related to the equally simplifying general approach of the dominating positivistic empiricism insisting, since Newtonian "hypotheses non fingo", on the exclusive effectiveness of that huge simplification, with practically forbidden searches for causally complete, strongly "ontological" and truly consistent explanations. What matters in this approach is the formal correspondence between a subjectively chosen "main" part of observations and a proposed abstract "model", with the underlying physical reasons for that correspondence, always remaining essential deviations, unsolvable "mysteries" and glaring contradictions between different "models" being left apart as unnecessary "philosophy" preserved sometimes only for its own sake, as a kind of luxury decoration on top of otherwise "perfect" formal "modelling". ...
15 pages, 44 refs; Published as section 8.5 of the book: A. P. Kirilyuk, Theory of Everything, Ultimate Reality and the End of Humanity: Extended Sustainability by the Universal Science of Complexity (LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing, Beau Bassin, 2017)
... We start our analysis of the universal science of complexity [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] by showing that this is not true, because the unreduced interaction problem solution provides a well-specified qualitative extension of usual theory, including the intrinsic origin of irreversibly flowing time, uneven change/events and purposeful evolution of the causally emerging structure. These key features, critically missing in the framework of standard theory, can therefore be rigorously derived by the unreduced interaction analysis, giving rise to the qualitatively extended framework of the new mathematics of complexity [1,2,6,[9][10][11]14,15] with its intrinsic teleology (of real system dynamics) appearing at various complexity levels, from simplest physical systems to consciousness and civilisation development. ...
... We can now summarise the obtained teleological features of the new mathematics of complexity [1,2,6,[9][10][11]14,15] derived from the unreduced interaction problem solution: ...
... These features have been specified and confirmed within a wide range of applications, from the elementary particle origin and dynamics to the highest complexity levels of consciousness and civilisation development [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. We explicitly obtain the unified complex-dynamic origin of not only real world structures and dynamical laws of their behaviour, but also of all "intrinsic" properties (like relativistic mass-energy or electric charge). ...
Based on the unreduced, non-perturbative solution to arbitrary interaction problem, we show that any interaction process underlying real system dynamics and object properties gives rise to irreversible time flow, universally specified evolution purpose and meaningful intentions at higher levels of universally defined dynamic complexity. The new mathematics of real-world complexity contains thus well-specified intrinsic teleology due to its rigorously derived extension with respect to usual, "goal-free" and "mindless" theory. We outline major aspects and applications of that extended, naturally teleological and causally complete science framework , including critically important problem solutions.
... ¡Incluso ello ocurre en las ciencias duras!(López y Castro, 2008). 3 Las obras de RenéZabaleta (1983) y José Mauricio Domingues (2009) son dos ejemplos notables. ...
The cognitive practices and the publications that derive from them express central aspects of intellectual identity, empirically speaking. In this paper, we study the identities of social scientists in Latin America. In a first section, we describe disciplinary practices from the point of view of the variation of the frequencies and types of publication carried out by social scientists in their production of knowledge. In a second section, we built a description of the semantics involved in such publications. Both sections refer to the accounting of three disciplines: sociology, economics and political science. Data coverage is from five countries: Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia and Mexico. Finally, the discussion attempts to draw some lessons about academic capitalism in Latin America.
... The key property of any real interaction result (9)–(15) is its dynamic multivaluedness, or redundance, meaning that one has a redundant number of individually complete and therefore mutually incompatible solutions describing equally real system configurations, or realisations. This major property of system realisation (solution) plurality, underlying the new mathematics of complexity [8], [10], [11], [15]–[17] and the imminent complexity revolution in modern computer and control systems (section III), is due to the nonlinear and selfconsistent dependence of the unreduced EP, (9)–(11), on the solutions to be found, which leads to the growth of the highest power of the characteristic equation determining the eigensolution number and reflects the physically obvious plurality of interacting eigen-mode combinations [6]–[12], [14]–[16]. If N ξ and N q are the numbers of terms in sums over i and n in (11), then the total eigenvalue number of equation (9) is N max = N ξ (N ξ N q + 1) = (N ξ ) 2 N q + N ξ , giving the N ξ fold redundance of the usual " complete " set of N ξ N q eigensolutions of equations (5) plus an additional, " incomplete " set of N ξ solutions. ...
... The obtained qualitatively new mathematics of complexity [8], [10], [15]–[17] is summarised by the dynamically probabilistic fractal (25)–(27) as its single, dynamically unified structure and the universal symmetry of complexity (32)–(40) as the unique law determining this structure evolution and dynamics (including all the observed local dynamic regimes and laws, now properly classified). In fact, this qualitatively new structure and symmetry constitute the main guiding principle of complex-dynamic system engineering, underlying all its particular principles and laws. ...
8 pages, 42 eqs, 23 refs; presented at the 20th International Conference on Control Systems and Computer Science (27-29 May 2015, Bucharest, Romania), http://cscs20.acs.pub.ro/
