Figure 2 - uploaded by Andrzej Stasiak
Content may be subject to copyright.
Download
View publication
Multiplicity example 

Multiplicity example 

Source publication
Figure 1. UML 2.0 Diagrams 3 Changes to previously known diagrams UML...
Table 1 . Selected New Activity diagram elements
Figure 2. Multiplicity example 
Figure 3. UML 2.0 interface notation 
+5 Figure 4. Deployment diagram example 
New features in UML syntax and semantics
Article
Full-text available
  • Jan 2006
This paper is an overview of the most important new features introduced to version 2.0 of Unified Modeling Language. We denote the changes to existing diagram and present four new modeling techniques. We present the changes in definitions of syntax, semantics and pragmatics of behavioral and static models of systems designed with UML 2.0. Particula...
Cite
Download full-text

Context in source publication

Context 1
... associations. UML 2.0 better details the multiplicities by adding (in curly braces) keywords representing type of the multiplicity [1]: set - unordered, unique (duplicates not allowed) elements default; bag - unordered, non-unique (duplicates allowed) elements; ordered- ordered, unique elements ; list (or sequence) ordered, non-unique elements; Fig. 2 presents a sample class diagram using composition, which shows us that a single hotel has between 1 and 25 non-duplicate hotel rooms. The same rules apply to specifying multiplicities of attributes and objects. Another change is a reduction in number of dependency relationship types. In UML 2.0 dependency relationship types <<local>>, ...

Similar publications

Fig. 1. nlrpBENCH List of Tasks. It comprises over 50 specifications...
Table 1 . T2U Benchmark Example: Model Extraction of Different...
Fig. 2. The DaimlerCrysler Demonstrator Specification. A short summary...
Table 2 . TC Benchmark Example 1: Flaw Detection by RESI [10] and...
+1 Fig. 3. The Timbered House exam text with the expected UML class diagram.
nlrpBENCH: A Benchmark for Natural Language Requirements Processing
Technical Report
Full-text available
  • Jun 2014
Recent advances in natural language processing have made it possible to process textual software requirements automatically, for example checking them for flaws or translating them into software artifacts. This development is particularly fortunate, as the majority of requirements is written in unrestricted natural language. However, many of the to...
View