Table 1 - uploaded by Krzysztof Krawiec
Content may be subject to copyright.
Material properties.

Material properties.

Source publication
Article
Full-text available
In the article a comparison analysis is presented between a numerical model of the stress and deformation state in a rock mass and an S-wave velocity model obtained as a result of in situ measurement. The research was conducted using data from the Jastrzębie and Moszczenica coal mines. The part of the rock mass examined was strongly disturbed by mu...

Similar publications

Article
Full-text available
Transparent working surface is an important part of intelligent coal mining. It provides detailed geological structure information of working face for intelligent coal mining. This paper proposes a working surface exploration method based on segmented and dynamic cross-hole seismic, which can realize progressive fine detection of coal working face....

Citations

... Czarny, Marcak, Nakata, Pilecki, and Isakow (2016) also presented the usefulness of seismic interferometry together with ambient seismic noise registered on the surface to monitor seismic velocity changes during mining. Seismic interferometry was also the subject of the LOFRES project (Czarny et al., 2016; Isakow, Pilecki, & Sierodzki, 2014;Krawiec & Czarny, 2017;Marcak, Pilecki & Czarny, 2014;Marcak, Pilecki, Isakow, & Czarny, 2014;. ...
Article
Full-text available
The main objective of this paper is to present the usefulness of the seismic interferometry method to determine the S-wave velocity model of the rock mass affected by exploitation in the KGHM Rudna copper ore mine. The research aim was achieved on the basis of seismic data, acquired from seismograms, of 10 strong seismic events of magnitude greater than 2.6. They were recorded by a pair of seismometers deployed on mining terrain. In the first stage, the Rayleigh wave between seismometers was estimated. Then, the group velocity dispersion curves of fundamental and first higher modes were identified. Finally, inversion of the dispersion curves to a 1D S-wave velocity model up to 500 m in depth was obtained. The velocity model was determined for the part of the rock mass partially affected by mining. The results confirm similar rock mass structure and velocities of the subsurface layers as those obtained by the archival 3D model. In both models, a high degree of correlation in the boundary location between the overburden of the Cenozoic formations and the bedrock of the Triassic formations was observed. The applied methodology can be used to estimate the S-wave velocity model in other mining regions characterized by strong seismicity.
... The seismic threat in Polish hard coal mines is associated with many factors of natural and mining origin [1][2][3][4][5][6]. One of the basic ones is stress concentration in coal seams which occurs in particular as a result of the impact of the edges and remnants of adjacent coal seams [7][8][9]. The magnitude of such impacts is commonly recognized by seismic profiling [1,[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. ...
Article
Full-text available
In the study, a comparison between the results of seismic profiling and the active seismoacoustic method WAS-96/RMS has been presented. The methods were used to assess the impact of an overlying coal seam edge on the relative stress state of the test heading in the chosen hard coal mine in the Upper Silesian Coal Basin, Poland. The work presents the methodologies of measurement, processing and interpretation of both methods. In the research area there were two edges of the adjacent seams at vertical distances of 70 and 100 m. The obtained results allowed for the development of conclusions regarding the effectiveness of both methods. It was stated, that the seismic profiling method, as well as the WAS-96/RMS method allowed for the identification of anomalies in the area of impact of the overlying coal seams. Based on previous experience, a comparison of the advantages and limitations of the seismic profiling and the WAS- 96/RMS method has also been presented. As a result, it was found that seismic profiling should be the basic method for assessing the impact of the edges and remnants of exploited seams, whereas the WAS-96/RMS method may be used as a complementary method if a confirmation of the rockbursts threat is required.