FIGURE 30 - uploaded by Shabuddin Shaik
Content may be subject to copyright.
Source publication
The genus Habrobathynella Schminke, 1973 contains 16 species, 2 from Madagascar and 14 from the peninsular India. This is a remarkably species-rich genus when compared to the three other genera of the family Parabathynellidae known from India: Atopobathynella Schminke, 1973 (5 spp.), Chilibathynella Noodt, 1964 (1 sp.), and Parvulobathynella Schmin...
Citations
... Successively, Ranga Reddy et al. (2014), found them in seven of the ten known Habrobathynella species (Fig. 6: 1-5) from India. Paragnathes are present in the 17 species of Habrobathynella from India, but uncertainties of their presence in the two species of Habrobathynella from Madagascar are not resolved (Shaik & Ranga Reddy, 2018). Bandari et al. (2017) also found paragnathes in three new species of Atopobathynella ( Fig. 6: 6, 7) from India. ...
... There is a significant difference between the morphology of Bathynellidae paragnathes and the other two families. Shaik & Ranga Reddy (2018) explained the differences like this: 'in Bathynellidae both paragnathes are in the form of two discrete, large lateral "lobes" or "branches" of varying shape and size, generally covered with spinules, and without distinct median lobe (coupler)'; while in Parabathynellidae: 'both paragnathes are fused into a single entity, consisting of a well-developed median lobe (coupler) and two small lateral lobes (or arms). The relative size, shape, and the nature of ornamentation, if present, of the median coupler together with size, shape, orientation, and ornamentation, if any, of the lateral lobes constitute a reliable species-specific criterion'. ...
The systematic status of the controversial crustacean family Leptobathynellidae is investigated using molecular and morphological methods in this study. Partial sequences of the nuclear 18S gene are studied from 28 genera of Bathynellacea from several continents. The analysis includes some of the most plesiomorphic genera of the family Parabathynellidae, such as Billibathynella and Brevisomabathynella from Australia; Habrobathynella and Parvulobathynella from India; the diverse Iberobathynella; the cosmopolitan genus Hexabathynella; and representative genera of two subfamilies of Bathynellidae (Gallobathynellinae and Bathynellinae). We used a molecular approach to analyse the systematic relationships amongst 64 species from Europe, North America, Australia and Asia, and review the morphological characters relevant at the family level. The molecular phylogeny clearly shows the presence of three highly divergent clades that could represent the three families. This is the first molecular phylogenetic reconstruction of Bathynellacea that can be used to: (1) verify the validity of Leptobathynellidae, (2) explore the diversity of the families and (3) explore the phylogenetic relationships among families. We propose a plausible evolutionary scenario for the order Bathynellacea.
A new phreatoicidean isopod, Speonastes venkataramani gen., sp. nov. is described from Borra Cave in northeastern Andhra Pradesh, India. This new taxon has features seen in most phreatoicideans such as ventrally projecting pleonal pleurae, but also has features characteristic of the hypogean family Hypsimetopidae, such as an elongated pleotelson with a medially rotating uropod that has protopodal denticles or denticulate setae opposing the denticulate margin of the pleotelson, as well as the distal article of the antennula being minute and the penultimate article elongated and somewhat inflated. Robustness-tested phylogenetic analyses of character data from exemplars from nearly all phreatoicidean genera and four non-phreatoicidean outgroups finds that this species is the earliest derived member of Hypsimetopidae. These analyses have substantial implications for both relationships among Phreatoicidea, but within the family as well. The body form of the Phreatoicidea basal to the hypsimetopid clade resembles the form seen in fossils or by recent taxa such as Crenisopus Wilson & Keable, 1999. Ancestors of Speonastes gen. nov. may have independently colonized India from those of the Nichollsia-Andhracoides clade. An early Mesozoic diversification of Hypsimetopidae and related taxa along continental rifts in eastern Gondwana between Antarctica, India, and Australia is one implication of the phylogeny. Although the caves of Andhra Pradesh and other Indian states have biologically unique and scientifically important taxa, India provides no protection for any cave. This exposes the fauna to negative impacts such as quarrying or illegal mining, over-exploitation of water resources, and damage from unconstrained tourist visitation.
Subterranean ecosystems are among the most widespread environments on Earth, yet we still have poor knowledge of their biodiversity. To raise awareness of subterranean ecosystems, the essential services they provide, and their unique conservation challenges, 2021 and 2022 were designated International Years of Caves and Karst. As these ecosystems have traditionally been overlooked in global conservation agendas and multilateral agreements, a quantitative assessment of solution-based approaches to safeguard subterranean biota and associated habitats is timely. This assessment allows researchers and practitioners to understand the progress made and research needs in subterranean ecology and management. We conducted a systematic review of peer-reviewed and grey literature focused on subterranean ecosystems globally (terrestrial, freshwater, and saltwater systems), to quantify the available evidence-base for the effectiveness of conservation interventions. We selected 708 publications from the years 1964 to 2021 that discussed, recommended, or implemented 1,954 conservation interventions in subterranean ecosystems. We noted a steep increase in the number of studies from the 2000s while, surprisingly, the proportion of studies quantifying the impact of conservation interventions has steadily and significantly decreased in recent years. The effectiveness of 31% of conservation interventions has been tested statistically. We further highlight that 64% of the reported research occurred in the Palearctic and Nearctic biogeographic regions. Assessments of the effectiveness of conservation interventions were heavily biased towards indirect measures (monitoring and risk assessment), a limited sample of organisms (mostly arthropods and bats), and more accessible systems (terrestrial caves). Our results indicate that most conservation science in the field of subterranean biology does not apply a rigorous quantitative approach, resulting in sparse evidence for the effectiveness of interventions. This raises the important question of how to make conservation efforts more feasible to implement, cost-effective, and long-lasting. Although there is no single remedy, we propose a suite of potential solutions to focus our efforts better towards increasing statistical testing and stress the importance of standardising study reporting to facilitate meta-analytical exercises. We also provide a database summarising the available literature, which will help to build quantitative knowledge about interventions likely to yield the greatest impacts depending upon the subterranean species and habitats of interest. We view this as a starting point to shift away from the widespread tendency of recommending conservation interventions based on anecdotal and expert-based information rather than scientific evidence, without quantitatively testing their effectiveness.
Indobathynella socrates n. sp. is described from Karaiguda Cave in the Visakhapatnam District of Andhra Pradesh state, south-eastern India. This is the first cavernicolous species of Indobathynella, which is incidentally the most reduced genus in the family Bathynellidae as a whole. The type species of this genus, Indobathynella prehensilis, is from a farm bore. The new species fulfils all the principal generic criteria of Indobathynella, but is distinctly different from I. prehensilis in several essential features: absence of subapical seta on antennary exopod; 4 claws on distal maxillulary endite; 6 teeth on mandibular gnathobase, and uropodal exopod without ventro-medial seta. These and all other salient differences between the two species are tabulated. Besides providing brief notes on conservation and biogeography of the new species, a key to all the known Indian taxa of Bathynellidae is given for the first time.
