Figure 1 - uploaded by Lynnea Parker
Content may be subject to copyright.
Map of Manitoba featuring the study area and municipalities. Base map with municipal boundaries obtained from Manitoba Land Initiative (Government of Manitoba) with modifications by Lynnea Parker.

Map of Manitoba featuring the study area and municipalities. Base map with municipal boundaries obtained from Manitoba Land Initiative (Government of Manitoba) with modifications by Lynnea Parker.

Source publication
Technical Report
Full-text available
In the spring of 2019, the 12th Prairie Conservation and Endangered Species Conference was hosted in Winnipeg, Manitoba. This conference brought together representatives from the agricultural sector, conservation organizations, academia, and government to discuss native prairie conservation in “working landscapes” across Canada. The theme “working...

Contexts in source publication

Context 1
... order to better understand how the values and priorities of landowners and cattle producers affect grassland conservation efforts, the southwestern region was the focal area of this study. The study area was broken down into two segments: 1) primary target area and 2) generalized target area ( Figure 1). The primary target area included 13 municipalities that coincided with areas of significant conservation priority for land securement and species at risk recovery efforts. ...
Context 2
... Annual payment program for a habitat outcome 2. Voluntary carbon offset program 3. Operational costs assistance program with a grazing plan 4. Bird-friendly beef certification label 5. Term agreements (10, 20, or more years) with one-time payment 6. Easements in perpetuity with an annual payment for a prescribed period 1, 2, and 3), would consider (likely scores 5, 6, 7), undecided (score of 4). ...
Context 3
... were 12 factors that explained potential reasons why landowners would not engage in a conservation program. The four highest ranking factors were ( Figure 10, Table 8): ...
Context 4
... were asked to indicate how important five different features were when considering participation in a conservation program ( Figure 11, Table 9). Mean results show that all five features were considered to be important. ...