Fig 2 - available via license: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Content may be subject to copyright.
Left panel: Placement of EMA sensors in experiment 2. Orange dots mark articulatory movement sensors; blue dots mark static, head reference sensors. LM ¼ left mastoid; RM ¼ right mastoid; UI ¼ upper incisor; UL ¼ upper lip; LL ¼ lower lip; J ¼ jaw; TT ¼ tongue tip; TD ¼ tongue dorsum. Right panel: Bite plate used to obtain occlusal plane prior to the speaking task (image by Carstens Medizinelektronik).
Source publication
The present study tested whether there is cross-interference between electromagnetic articulography (EMA) and electroglottography (EGG) during the acquisition of kinematic speech data. In experiments 1A and 1B, EMA sensors were calibrated with and without EGG electrodes present in the EMA field. In experiment 2, EMA was used to record lip, tongue,...
Context in source publication
Context 1
... generated in the EGG ABS condition of experiment 1. Articulatory sensors were placed on the upper lip (UL), lower lip (LL), jaw (J), tongue tip (TT), and tongue dorsum (TD) with static head reference sensors placed on the gingiva above the upper incisor (UI) and behind each ear on the left mastoid (LM) and right mastoid (RM) processes (shown in Figs. 2 and 3). The UI-reference sensor was placed intraorally on the gingiva of the upper incisors using a piece of Stomahesive wafer. The LM-and RM-reference sensors were firmly placed using medical tape. Prior to the speaking tasks, each participant's mid-occlusal plane was obtained by attaching three sensors to the Carstens bite plate (back ...
Similar publications
This study examined the effect of modality onset asynchrony and response processing time for the recognition of text-supplemented speech. Speech and text were periodically interrupted by noise or black bars, respectively, to preserve 50% of the sentence and presented in unimodal and multimodal conditions. Sentence recognition and response errors we...
