FIGURE 17 - uploaded by Anne Kapp
Content may be subject to copyright.
LONGITUDINAL SEGMENTS WITH BASELINE OF UPPER TEETH ASCENDING TO THE RIGHT AND DORSAL. VIEW INTO THE INTERIOR POSTERIOR HEAD. 1) DURAL SEGMENTS, NUMBERED CORRESPONDING TO RELATED TEETH, HEAD INCLINED TO THE RIGHT AND ROTATING TO THE LEFT (ARROW), 2) OCCIPUT, REMODELLED POSITION (INCLINED TO THE HEAD), 3) BASELINE OF UPPER TEETH ASCENDING TO THE RIGHT AND DORSAL, 4) FORAMEN MAGNUM, 5) MASTOID PROCESS, 6) DURA BETWEEN C0-C2, TWISTING AND SLACKENED IN THE RIGHT, 7) AXIS, TILTED TO THE LEFT AND ROTATING TO THE RIGHT (ARROW), 8) 3 RD VERTEBRAL BODY AND 9) CONTINUING COURSE OF DURA AND SPINE, REVERSE TWIST.
Source publication
Our observations question both the current doctrine of spatial orientation as processed by vestibular, visual and proprioceptive impressions as well as the horizontal alignment of the eye axis. Indeed our observations suggest spatial orientation as a physically based, largely mechanically transmitted interaction between individual and environment....
Citations
... The relationship between dental structure and posture is well known and documented, as evidenced by recent and less recent articles in literature, especially when it comes to surgical interventions or bracing [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. However, it is perhaps less known how even minimal interventions or changes in the dental setting, e.g. the extraction of a tooth, can directly affect the posture of the person involved. ...
Background: Dental structure and posture is now well known to be closely linked to each other. This work is not intended to be the definitive proof of this link, but rather the exposure of a case that presents the particularity of an absolute procedural asepsis as the operator was not aware of the change in the dental setting of the subject examined.
... The relationship between dental structure and posture is well known and documented, as evidenced by recent and less recent articles in literature [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8], especially when it comes to surgical interventions or bracing [9][10][11]. However, it is perhaps less known how even minimal interventions or changes in the dental setting, e.g. the extraction of a tooth, can directly affect the posture of the person involved. ...
Background
Dental structure and posture is now well known to be closely linked to each other. This work is not intended to be the definitive proof of this link, but rather the exposure of a case that presents the particularity of an absolute procedural asepsis as the operator was not aware of the change in the dental setting of the subject examined.
Material sand Methods
The study began in 2020 and ended in 2021. The subject involved was a young woman of about 37 years old, weighing 52Kg and 1.58m tall, at the first postural analysis performed on 2020 January the third. Subsequently, two other postural analysis were performed, 13 months and 22 months after the first respectively. For the postural analysis, an identical protocol was followed in the three analyzes performed.
Results
Observing the results obtained in the three analysis, it can be deduced that approximately 63% of the controlled parameters (12 out of 19) underwent modifications, even if not all of them could be related to the variation of the dental setting.
Conclusion
The study, even within the limits of its design, highlights how the different systems that make up the human body are interdependent and an action performed on one of them can be found as a modification of the initial state of others.
