Fig 1 - uploaded by Ki-Kwang Lee
Content may be subject to copyright.
Golf swing sequence with a seven iron: a address, b backswing, c top of the swing, d downswing, e impact, f follow-through, g finish 

Golf swing sequence with a seven iron: a address, b backswing, c top of the swing, d downswing, e impact, f follow-through, g finish 

Source publication
Article
Full-text available
This paper describes an autonomous kinematic analysis platform for wrist angle measurement that is capable of evaluating a user’s uncocking motion in his or her golf swing and providing instructional multimodal feedback to improve his or her skills. This uncocking motion, which is a characteristic movement of the wrist during the golf swing, is an...

Contexts in source publication

Context 1
... full swing consists of a series of key poses: address, backswing, top of the swing, downswing, impact, follow-through, and finish, as shown in Fig. 1. Among the successive swing procedures, the uncocking motion occurs in the downswing — the interval from the top of the swing to the impact. Therefore, the motion segmentation used to detect the downswing phase in the input golf swing is required prior to the uncocking motion analysis. In the motion segmentation module, the system recognizes three key pose moments in order to segment the sequential IMU sensor data of the golf swing stored in the dataset and then detects the ideal uncocking moment in the downswing phase. The three key poses are the beginning of the takeaway (the first movement after the address position), the top of the swing, and the impact. The ideal uncocking moment is defined as the moment at which the left arm is about 30° below the horizontal in the downswing, which is defined as the interval from the top of the swing to the impact. To detect the key poses and segment the input golf motion, we suppose that the user ’ s initial pose is the address, and set the x vector of the rotation matrix from the IMU sensor on the forearm at the address as an initial vector. Then, the system sequentially compares the x vector of the forearm in the array-type dataset with the initial vector in order to find four key events (beginning of the takeaway, top of the swing, impact, and ideal uncocking moment) and to segment the swing motion (backswing and downswing) based on the following procedures in Table 2. The system firstly sequentially calculates the included angles between the initial vector (the x vector of the rotation matrix from the IMU sensor on the forearm at the address) and every stored x vector of the forearm. The included angle can be computed from the inner product of the two vectors, as described in Eq. (5). The system removes noise from a series of included angles by using a 1D Gaussian smoothing filter. Then, it detects the beginning of the takeaway based on the above procedures. The 1D Gaussian smoothing filter for the discrete sequential data is derived via the following ...
Context 2
... chosen coordinate system. They measured rotational motion and estimated translation in the link model of the golf swing. However, to accurately measure the position and rotation of each body part, the length of each body part and the initial angle of each joint in the artificial link model must be manually defined by users and by using an additional sensor, such as an inclinometer. In addition, an estimate of the rotation using only gyro sensors might be not reliable, because small bias errors will quickly result in drift errors in the estimation [10]. Many researchers [8, 12, 18] have studied the kinematic analysis of the golf swing by using optical motion capture, which is one of the systems most often used to detect fast-moving human body parts. They analyzed the fundamental geometric and kinematic characteristics of the hip and trunk movements in the golf swing based on the measurement of the trajectories of target points (markers) attached to the human body by using multiple preinstalled cameras. These systems provide high accuracy, complete freedom of movement, and the possibility of interactions among various actors with a higher computational cost. To exploit this system for human body part tracking, however, the resources necessary to acquire the multi-view image data are a capture room, a body suit, and camera equipment. The capture room must be large enough to allow recording from a large number of viewpoints at a sufficient distance. The moving person should wear a special body suit with markers on certain body parts. Also, multiple cameras should be installed in the capture room, with scrupulous attention to ensuring synchronization, a high frame rate, and a suitable resolution. Therefore, expertise is necessarily required due to such issues, so it is difficult to use the optical motion capture for commercial and practical purposes regarding golf swing analysis, especially for amateur golfers who want to utilize this system personally. Particularly, the above techniques do not provide detailed feedback to help novices improve their swing skills; they focus on the quantitative analyses and measurement methodologies of the given golf swing. In this paper, we present an IMU sensor-based autonomous kinematic analysis platform for wrist angle measurement that enables the evaluation of a user ’ s uncocking motion in his or her golf swing. As mentioned above, an IMU sensor provides accurate orientation or rotation information so that it can be used for motion capture technology [13]. Because an IMU sensor can sense and transmit the orientation data with a high sampling rate, it is well-suited to the analysis of continuously and unobtrusively fast-moving human motions, especially to sports technologies for technique training [25]. In [6, 7], Ghasemzadeh et al. presented a golf swing training system that incorporates five custom-designed IMUs to obtain information on wrist rotation in relation to the direction of the club face and provide feedback on the quality of movements. To evaluate wrist rotation, they built a quantitative model by using PCA and LDA techniques for dimension reduction and the linear projection of data from sensors. However, the initial parameters for PCA and LDA, such as the number of principal components, must be defined carefully. If not, the evaluation method may be not reliable. Also, their system provides only numerical feedback. Compared to this system, the method proposed in this paper focuses on the wrist uncocking motion, which is to release the bended wrist at impact moment to generate additional power. This system can analyze and evaluate the uncocking motion automatically, without any initial parameters. Moreover, instructional and more specific feedback for the improvement of the user ’ s golf skill is provided. Table 1 shows the various kinds of representative techniques for motion analysis, as well as their limitations. Our system uses only two IMU sensors to measure the wrist angle quantitatively and has the ability to segment the inputted golf swing motions by recognizing the key poses and to detect the uncocking moment in the sequential swing motions. In order to help the user improve his or her skill, the system provides detailed verbal and graphical feedback based on the measurement result of the uncocking motion. Therefore, our system can be applied to a diagnostic system for swing correction by using multimodal feedback. In order to discern the important considerations in system development, the concepts of wrist cocking and uncocking in the golf swing must be examined. In this section, we briefly describe the considerations of our system with respect to the changes in wrist angle during the golf swing. Before beginning a detailed discussion of wrist cocking and uncocking, it is necessary to describe the golf swing. A full swing consists of a series of key poses: address, backswing, top of the swing, downswing, impact, follow-through, and finish, as shown in Fig. 1. In the process of these sequential motions, many factors, such as upper body twisting, wrist angle changes, weight shift, and so on, affect performance in terms of club speed and acceleration. Among these, the wrist angle, the relative angle between the forearm and golf club, is one of the most important factors in achieving accurate impact and distance. There are two representative motions in golf swing wrist angle, cocking and uncocking, as illustrated in Fig. 2. Cocking occurs naturally from the waist up during the backswing. At the top of the swing, cocking occurs in the direction of the thumb. If cocking occurs not toward the thumb, but toward the back or palm of the hand, the clubface will be misaligned, making it difficult to hit the ball straight. The golfer can generate additional power at the moment of impact and cause the follow-through to follow the ball by keeping the wrist cocked during the downswing until just before impact and then uncocking. Doing so will also make it easier to hit the ball straight. Thus, cocking and uncocking add power to the swing. Our system focuses on wrist uncocking in a full swing. In order to implement the detection of the uncocking moment and an evaluation algorithm, we must consider two technical problems: how to recognize key poses and how to quantitatively apply the aforementioned theory to uncocking detection. In the former case, we utilize the three- dimensional rotation of an IMU sensor attached to a golf club. For the latter, our system detects and evaluates the uncocking motion based on previous studies, which have defined the role of biomechanics in maximizing the distance and accuracy of golf shots through qualitative and quantitative evidence [9]. According to such research, a golfer can maximize the distance of his or her drives by uncocking the wrist when the left arm is about 30° below the horizontal on the downswing. Based on this research, the system can detect and evaluate key poses and uncocking by using three-dimensional IMU sensor data. The next section describes the proposed system in ...

Similar publications

Article
Full-text available
Assessing a coach's technical knowledge of a sporting technique can reveal measureable biomechanical parameters associated with a successful performance. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to identify the key technical parameters that golf coaches associate with a successful golf swing. Sixteen high-level golf coaches were observed coaching a...

Citations

... Maintenance activities related to golf courses have also been described, by taking advantage of static wireless sensor networks combined with remote sensing data in order to monitor environmental parameters such as soil moisture [16]. Table 1 [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] summarizes some relevant contributions related to golf sport. It presents works focused on improving the movements of the golf player, specifically the swing motion. ...
Article
Full-text available
The practice of sports has been steadily evolving, taking advantage of different technological tools to improve different aspects such as individual/collective training, support in match development or enhancement of audience experience. In this work, an in-house implemented monitoring system for golf training and competition is developed, composed of a set of distributed end devices, gateways and routers, connected to a web-based platform for data analysis, extraction and visualization. Extensive wireless channel analysis has been performed, by means of deterministic 3D radio channel estimations and radio frequency measurements, to provide coverage/capacity estimations for the specific use case of golf courses. The monitoring system has been fully designed considering communication as well as energy constraints, including wireless power transfer (WPT) capabilities in order to provide flexible node deployment. System validation has been performed in a real golf course, validating end-to-end connectivity and information handling to improve overall user experience.
... It has also been shown that data derived from IMUs have the potential to classify swing technique as proper or improper, where improper swing has a higher likelihood to cause injury (18). Finally, real-time IMU-based analysis of the wrist angle uncocking motion shows the coaching potential of wearable sensors (19). Single-score indices are widely used in gait evaluation to assess walking patterns and are useful in diagnosis and outcome assessment (20)(21)(22). ...
... Wearable, lightweight inertial measurement unit (IMU) equipped devices open the door to real-time analytics on shoulder (upper torso) and hip (pelvic) rotation during onthe-field training. IMUs have been used with machine learning algorithms to identify specific segments of golf swing (17), recognize swing patterns that can lead to injuries (18), analyze clubhead speed (16), and provide feedback for wrist angles in uncocking motion (19). Integrating IMUs for motion analysis and summarizing the parameters that correlate to pro swing into a single score can assist with providing real-time feedback. ...
Article
Full-text available
Introduction Golf swing generates power through coordinated rotations of the pelvis and upper torso, which are highly consistent among professionals. Currently, golf performance is graded on handicap, length-of-shot, and clubhead-speed-at-impact. No performance indices are grading the technique of pelvic and torso rotations. As an initial step toward developing a performance index, we collected kinematic metrics of swing rotational biomechanics and hypothesized that a set of these metrics could differentiate between amateur and pro players. The aim of this study was to develop a single-score index of rotational biomechanics based on metrics that are consistent among pros and could be derived in the future using inertial measurement units (IMU). Methods Golf swing rotational biomechanics was analyzed using 3D kinematics on eleven professional (age 31.0 ± 5.9 years) and five amateur (age 28.4 ± 6.9 years) golfers. Nine kinematic metrics known to be consistent among professionals and could be obtained using IMUs were selected as candidate variables. Oversampling was used to account for dataset imbalances. All combinations, up to three metrics, were tested for suitability for factor analysis using Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin tests. Principal component analysis was performed, and the logarithm of Euclidean distance of principal components between golf swings and the average pro vector was used to classify pro vs. amateur golf swings employing logistic regression and leave-one-out cross-validation. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was used to determine the optimal set of kinematic metrics. Results A single-score index calculated using peak pelvic rotational velocity pre-impact, pelvic rotational velocity at impact, and peak upper torso rotational velocity post-impact demonstrated strong predictive performance to differentiate pro (mean ± SD:100 ± 10) vs. amateur (mean ± SD:82 ± 4) golfers with an AUC of 0.97 and a standardized mean difference of 2.12. Discussion In this initial analysis, an index derived from peak pelvic rotational velocity pre-impact, pelvic rotational velocity at impact, and peak upper torso rotational velocity post-impact demonstrated strong predictive performance to differentiate pro from amateur golfers. Swing Performance Index was developed using a limited sample size; future research is needed to confirm results. The Swing Performance Index aims to provide quantified feedback on swing technique to improve performance, expedite training, and prevent injuries.
... Similar to markers and electromagnetic sensors, wearable IMUs may affect the natural swing of the golfer. IMUs on the hand and upper arm have been used to distinguish amateur from professional golf swings [24] and to calculate the time-varying wrist angle [25], thereby providing real-time data to the player or coach on wrist release. However, Lückemann et al. [26] cautioned that an IMU placed on the wrist did not give precise measurements of clubhead speed. ...
Article
A narrative review of dynamic models of golf phenomena is presented, as well as current technologies for measuring the motions of a golfer, club, and ball. Kinematic and dynamic models of the golf swing are reviewed, including models with prescribed motions or torques as inputs, and predictive dynamic models that maximize an objective (e.g., driving distance) to determine optimal inputs or equipment designs. Impulse–momentum and continuous contact dynamic models for clubhead–ball and ball–ground impacts are described. The key observations from 172 cited references are extracted and presented, along with suggestions for future research.
... Table 4 lists the papers according to the groups presented. [25,42] In biomechanics, we are interested in the movement of the body and its parts. This makes the position of the sensor one of the most important elements in measuring motion. ...
... This is the ability to combine information from multiple sensors to measure and calculate motion. Sensor fusion is used in 21 papers [17,25,29,47,51,53,54,[61][62][63][64]76,81,90,110,115,119,139,149,157,159]. ...
... User 50 [19,20,22,24,25,28,29,31,33,35,37,38,42,44,47,53,60,68,70,71,83,84,88,94,97,101,108,113,118,120,121,123,125,128,[132][133][134]137,139,141,142,[150][151][152][153][154][157][158][159] Expert 106 [17,18,21,23,[25][26][27]30,[32][33][34]36,[39][40][41]43,45,46,48,49,51,52,[54][55][56][57][58][59][61][62][63][64][65][66][67]69,[72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82][85][86][87][89][90][91][92][93][95][96][97][98][99][100][101][102][103][104][105][106][107][108][109][110][111][112][114][115][116][117]119,122,124,126,127,[129][130][131][132][133][134][135][136][137][138][140][141][142][143][144][145][146][147][148][149]151,155,156,160] ...
Article
Full-text available
Real-time biomechanical feedback (BMF) is a relatively new area of research. The potential of using advanced technology to improve motion skills in sport and accelerate physical rehabilitation has been demonstrated in a number of studies. This paper provides a literature review of BMF systems in sports and rehabilitation. Our motivation was to examine the history of the field to capture its evolution over time, particularly how technologies are used and implemented in BMF systems, and to identify the most recent studies showing novel solutions and remarkable implementations. We searched for papers in three research databases: Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed. The initial search yielded 1167 unique papers. After a rigorous and challenging exclusion process, 144 papers were eventually included in this report. We focused on papers describing applications and systems that implement a complete real-time feedback loop, which must include the use of sensors, real-time processing, and concurrent feedback. A number of research questions were raised, and the papers were studied and evaluated accordingly. We identified different types of physical activities, sensors, modalities, actuators, communications, settings and end users. A subset of the included papers, showing the most perspectives, was reviewed in depth to highlight and present their innovative research approaches and techniques. Real-time BMF has great potential in many areas. In recent years, sensors have been the main focus of these studies, but new types of processing devices, methods, and algorithms, actuators, and communication technologies and protocols will be explored in more depth in the future. This paper presents a broad insight into the field of BMF.
... This sampling rate has been shown to be sufficient in capturing kinematics data during swinging actions in sports. 18,21,22 The devices were fixed to the body segments with elastic belts 2 cm wide. None of the participants reported any discomfort from wearing the sensors, and they all stated that the sensors did not affect their stroke technique. ...
Article
Whereas 3D optical motion capture (OMC) systems are considered the gold standard for kinematic assessment in sport science, they present some drawbacks that limit its use in the field. Inertial measurement units (IMUs) incorporating gyroscopes have been considered as a more practical alternative. Thus, the aim of the study was to evaluate the level of agreement for angular velocity between IMU gyroscopes and an OMC system for varying tennis strokes and intensities. In total, 240 signals of angular velocity from different body segments and types of strokes (forehand, backhand and service) were recorded from four players (two competition players and two beginners). The angular velocity of the IMU gyroscopes was compared to the angular velocity from the OMC system. Level of agreement was evaluated by correlation coefficients, magnitudes of errors in absolute and relative values and Bland-Altman plots. Differences between both systems were highly consistent within players’ skill (i.e., along the broad range of velocities) and axes (x, y, z). Correlations ranged from 0.951 to 0.993, indicating a very strong relationship and concordance. The magnitude of the differences ranged from 4.4 to 35.4 deg·s-1. The difference relative to the maximum angular velocity achieved was less than 5.0%. The study concluded that IMUs and OMC systems showed comparable values. Thus, IMUs seem to be a valid alternative to detect meaningful differences in angular velocity during tennis groundstrokes in field-based experimentation.
... Motion sensing devices can be also used in cooperation with other sensors. For instance, Chun et al. (Chun et al. 2014) combined in their work Microsoft Kinect with two IMUs to provide learning feedback to golf players during uncocking motion training. The uncocking motion is a part of a golf swing. ...
Chapter
Full-text available
Intensive development of e-learning methods still struggles with domains where feedback on manual and physical skills is necessary, for example, crafts or physiotherapy movements. Most of such training is currently done exclusively through direct teacher-student interaction. The traditional approach minimizes the possibilities for remote learning, requires large time investments, and contributes to high costs of education. While human feedback remains very important, modern wearable sensors allow to transfer part of the workload to e-learning. In this chapter, we present an overview of available solutions with particular focus on wearable sensors. We argue that wearable devices have the ability to enable a new step in e-learning, not only allowing the acquisition of theoretical knowledge but also training of manual and physical skills.
... Analyzing golf swings using inertial sensors, S. Chun et al. attached inertial sensors onto the wrist and the grips on golf clubs to propose a golf coaching model capable of analyzing and assessing users' uncocking motion [5]. C. N. K. Nam method of tracking the movement of golf clubs in golf swing motion [6]. ...
... For this purpose, two types of motion capture (Mocap) systems are mainly applied in recent years [35]: optical Mocap (OMocap) system [7,16,20,32] and wearable micro-sensors based Mocap system (MMocap) [1,2,5,13,25,31]. The OMocap systems require attaching reflective markers on golfer's body segment. ...
Article
Full-text available
In the past decade, golf has stimulated people’s great interest and the number of golf players has increased significantly. Therefore, how to train a golfer to make a perfect swing has attracted extensive research attentions. Among these researches, the most important step is to capture and reconstruct the swing movement in a transportable and non-intrusive way. Restricted by the development of present depth imaging devices, the initial captured swing movement may not be acceptable due to occlusions and mixing up of body parts. In this paper, to restore motion information from self-occlusion and reconstruct 3D golf swing from low resolution data, a Dynamic Bayesian Network (DBN) model based golf swing reconstruction algorithm is proposed to increase the capture accuracy considering the spatial and temporal similarities of swing between different golfers. A Smart Motion Reconstruction system for Golf swing, SMRG, is presented based on the DBN model with a popular depth imaging device, Kinect, as capturing device. Experimental results have proved that the proposed system can achieve comparable reconstruction accuracy to the commercial optical motion caption (OMocap) system and better performance than state of art modification algorithms using depth information.
... 近年来,传统的高尔夫培训方式逐渐被利用动 作捕捉设备逐步纠正挥杆动作的教学模式所取代。 动作捕捉设备主要分为两大类 [1] :光学动作捕捉设 备 [2,3] 与可穿戴式微传感器动作捕捉设备 [4,5] 。前者需 要在被捕捉者的肢体上附着主动式或被动式的标 2015-01-29 收到,2015-05-11 改回,2015-06-26 网络优先出版 国 家 自 然 科 学 基 金 (61431017) 和 科 技 部 国 际 科 技 合 作 专 项 ...
Article
The simple depth imaging device gains more and more attention because of its lower cost and easy-to-use property compared with traditional motion capture systems. However, this kind of devices lack the basic data condition of 3D motion reconstruction due to low resolution, occlusions, and mixing up of body parts. In this paper, a Dynamic Bayesian Network (DBN) model is proposed to describe the spatial and temporal characteristics of human body joints. The model is based on fusion of the parent-child characteristics of joints and multi-order Markov property of joint during motion. A golf swing capture and reconstruction system DBN-Motion (DBN-based Motion reconstruction system), is presented based on the DBN model and the similarity of swing with a simple depth imaging device, Kinect, as capturing device. The proposed system effectively solves the problem of occlusions and mixing up of body parts, and successfully captures and reconstructs golf swing in 3D space. Experimental results prove that the proposed system can achieve comparable reconstruction accuracy to the commercial optical motion caption system.
... Despite the increase of golf tools available in the market and the availability of plenty of materials explaining how to carry out such sequence of movements, novice golf players still find improving their swing skills to be a challenge [3]. Normally, golfers improve their swing through sessions with professional golf instructors using verbal and gestural feedback [3]. ...
... Despite the increase of golf tools available in the market and the availability of plenty of materials explaining how to carry out such sequence of movements, novice golf players still find improving their swing skills to be a challenge [3]. Normally, golfers improve their swing through sessions with professional golf instructors using verbal and gestural feedback [3]. Not withstanding the effectiveness of these traditional methods, with the rapid development of sensors, electronics and data analysis techniques, new opportunities open up for making these instructional sessions more effective, combining both guided and self assessment-based methods. ...
... On the other hand, coaching sessions can be expensive for amateur golfers and thus, they spend a great deal of time improving their swing movement on their own [3]. However, most of them do not know where to focus their efforts, since it is difficult to identify and modify faults in the complex combination of related movements that constitute a successful swing [3]. ...
Article
Golf is a popular sport around the world. Since an accomplished golf swing is essential for succeeding in this sport, golf players spend a considerable amount of time perfecting their swing. In order to guide the design of future computer-based training systems that support swing instruction, this paper analyzes the data gathered during interviews with golf instructors and participant observations of actual swing coaching sessions. Based on our fieldwork,we describe the characteristics of a proficient swing, how the instructional sessions are normally carried out and the challenges professional instructors face. Taking into account these challenges, we outlinewhich desirable capabilities future computer-based training systems for professional golf instructors should have.