Fig 2 - uploaded by Detlef Müller-Mahn
Content may be subject to copyright.
Source publication
Context in source publication
Context 1
... complexity of global risk settings. It identifies major risks associated with geopolitics, economics, environment, technology and society, and explores their interrelatedness within and between these five fields. The identified risks, their connections and feedbacks are visualized in a chart that can be read like a map of global risk scenarios (Fig. 2). The map serves as a tool to draw the attention of decision-makers to particular combined risks, and to foster collective risk management ...
Similar publications
Al igual que ya sucedió en 2020, 2021 ha estado dominado por la pandemia de COVID-19. Si hace un año escribíamos esta Nota Editorial con gran preocupación por la evolución de la situación de la infección originada por el SARS-CoV-2 y, a su vez, con grandes esperanzas puestas en las vacunas como estrategia preventiva, la actual viene marcada por la...
Into another year with ChemSystemsChem! In this Editorial, the editors summarize the developments at the journal in 2022, highlight new projects for 2023 and introduce the renewed Editorial Advisory Board. image
In 2020 I was invited to write an editorial review on radioactive molecules published in Molecules in 2019 and 2020 [...]
Citations
The initial outbreak response to the 2014–2016 Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) in West Africa was met with resistance in Liberia. In part, this was because responders failed to account for how the country's colonial history and sociocultural circumstances influenced attitudes and perceptions of the population. We argue that understanding the relationship between the broader structural influences and the subjective aspects–the lived experience of people in the region–is crucial to developing more effective outbreak measures. In this light, we adopt and refine the concept of “riskscape” to highlight how the resistance to response teams shifted as the EVD outbreak unfolded. To illustrate our argument, we consider how the particular historical, cultural, and political forces constituted a “postcolonial riskscape”, influencing evolving perceptions of risk and trust in the context of the outbreak response in the West Point informal settlement located in Liberia's capital, Monrovia. As part of that discussion, we demonstrate how the adoption of a bottom-up community-based strategy by response officials, stimulated changes in the riskscape that helped pave the way for the adoption of an improved response strategy that resulted in a relatively swift decrease in EVD prevalence.
Anthropogenic climate change is increasing the frequency and severity of the physical threats to human and planetary wellbeing. However, climate change risks, and their interaction with other “riskscapes”, remain understudied. Riskscapes encompass different viewpoints on the threat of loss across space, time, individuals and collectives. This Special Issue of the Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy, and Society enhances our understanding of the multifaceted and interlocking dimensions of climate change and riskscapes. It brings together rigorous and critical international scholarship across diverse realms on inquiry under two, interlinked, themes: (i) governance and institutional responses and (ii) vulnerabilities and inequalities. The contributors offer a forceful reminder that when considering climate change, social justice principles cannot be appended after the fact. Climate change adaptation and mitigation pose complex and interdependent social and ethical dilemmas that will need to be explicitly confronted in any activation of “Green New Deal” strategies currently being developed internationally. Such critical insights about the layered, unequal and institutional dimensions of risks are of paramount import when considering other riskscapes pertaining to conflict and war, displaced people and pandemics like the 2019–2020 global COVID-19 pandemic.
