Figure 2 - uploaded by Nguyen Hieu Trung
Content may be subject to copyright.
Source publication
This paper presents the applications of Geographic Information System (GIS) in three different Land Use Planning (LUP) approaches: The participatory LUP (PLUP) which strongly considers the local people perceptions for land utilizations, the guidelines for LUP by FAO enhanced with multi-criteria evaluation (FAO-MCE), and the LUP and analysis system...
Context in source publication
Context 1
... was a difference in preferences between the agriculture farmers and the aquaculture farmers, caused by differences in their biophysical and economic considerations. The farmers' land use plan is show in Figure 2. The main limitation of this approach is the spatial accuracy of the maps drawn by farmers. ...
Similar publications
A participatory land use planning approach (PLUP) was carried out in two villages of the Mekong Delta coastal area. The PLUP was done twice (2002 and 2003). A geographic information system (GIS) was used for analyzing the land use change, the realization of the farmers' preference, the preference change and the preference conflicts between groups o...
Citations
... Saaty proposed the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method [10]. AHP is one of the efficient process and help the decision maker as well as planners to examine all the data before final decision [11][12]. Geographic information system and analytical hierarchy process has been integrated to check the importance of criteria and [13]. ...
Determination of appropriate site location for urban development is critical issue in hilly areas. The present study aims the Geographic Information System (GIS) and Multicriteria Evaluation Technique (MCE) based site selection for urban development in Chikodi taluk, Belagavi district, Karnataka. In this study six thematic layers were considered such as slope, land use/land cover, road proximity, land value, lineaments and aspect, the generated thematic maps of these criteria were standardized using pair wise comparison matrix known as Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). A weight for each criterion was given by comparing them with each other according to their importance and all the six maps were converted into raster. Finally with the help of these weights all the six maps were integrated and overlaid for the preparation of site suitability map for the urban development. The final site suitability map was divided into five different suitability categories. The area under very low, low, moderate, high and very high lands stand at 1.81 km², 12.71 km², 37.94 km², 66.88 km², and 22.44 km² respectively. The present study allows the local people as well as planners for the appropriate plans of land use planning in sustainable urban development.
