FIGURE 1 - available via license: CC BY
Content may be subject to copyright.
FDA approved immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the United States A) SVI for "cancer immunotherapy" on Google; B) SVI for individual ICIs by trade name and drug class and year of first FDA approval; C) Correlation of "cancer immunotherapy" SVI with available clinical trials for ICIs on clinicaltrials.gov (R = 0.97, p < 0.0001).

FDA approved immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the United States A) SVI for "cancer immunotherapy" on Google; B) SVI for individual ICIs by trade name and drug class and year of first FDA approval; C) Correlation of "cancer immunotherapy" SVI with available clinical trials for ICIs on clinicaltrials.gov (R = 0.97, p < 0.0001).

Source publication
Article
Full-text available
Cancer patients are faced with increasing options for cancer care, especially with the introduction of cancer immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Though many patients turn to online resources to supplement their decision-making, it is unknown whether online resources in cancer immunotherapy with ICIs are written at an appropriat...

Similar publications

Article
Full-text available
Metacognitive judgment of one’s online search process (calibration) is an important element of searching efficiency. This study investigated Chinese university students’ calibration during online information search. Fourteen students s were asked to search answers for three assigned tasks. Immediately after the search, all participants attended ind...
Article
Full-text available
Objective: Current evidence shows the master of physical education has attracted attention since its opening. The study aims to quantify recent trends in the public interest and related online search behavior for master of physical education, and “nowcast” future scenarios with respect to the master of physical education. Methods: Baidu Index, a d...
Article
Full-text available
The internet network continues to be a major source of health-related information. Our research provides insights into the online health-seeking behaviors of the general population, and evaluates the potential relationship between the COVID-19 pandemic and public interest and awareness of general sleep health, mental health and wellbeing. Google Tr...
Preprint
Full-text available
Background Patients and their caregivers, including clinicians and educators, use web-based search engines to access healthcare-related information from the internet. Online search behavior analysis has been used to obtain insights on health information demand. Objectives We aimed to describe the online search behavior for autoimmune encephalitis w...
Article
Full-text available
Background: High-energy visible (HEV) possesses high-frequency in the violet-blue band of the visible light spectrum. Blue light has relevance to ophthalmology via photochemically-induced retinal injury. Objectives: To explore the spatial-temporal mapping of online search behavior concerning HEV light. Materials and Methods: We retrieved raw data o...

Citations

Article
Background: Patients' decision-making and perceptions of outcomes may be impacted by information sources. We investigated use of information by patients and tested the association with patients' perception of treatment outcomes. Methods: We prospectively surveyed patients with advanced solid cancers and their oncologists regarding benefits/risks of non-curative cancer therapies. We previously reported misperception comparing patients' perceptions of treatment outcomes to those of their oncologist. We report external information use as proportions with binomial confidence intervals (CI) and examined correlations with misperception levels using Spearman's correlation coefficient. Results: Of 125 participants, 70% (95% CI: 61-78) stated that they wanted as much information as possible from their oncologist, and nearly all (95%, 95% CI: 90-98) felt the amount of information provided by their clinician was "just right." Over half (60%, 95% CI: 51-69) wanted at least "a moderate amount" of information from sources outside their oncologist, and 58% (95% CI: 49-67) reported obtaining information from sources outside their oncologist. Over two-thirds (69%, 95% CI: 57-79) of participants felt the information from external sources influenced their decisions "a small amount" or less. There was no correlation between information use and misperception regarding tumor response (r: -.04; P = .60) or treatment toxicity (r: .05; P = .60). Conclusion: Many patients sought information from sources outside their oncologist; few felt it substantially influenced treatment choices. External information use was not associated with greater misperception of treatment outcomes. These data suggest sources of information outside the treating oncologists did not substantially influence patient's decision making.