Figure - available from: Journal of Comparative Physiology A
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Examples of signal waveforms and frequency spectra. a Waveforms of a 90-kHz signal (El—electronic waveform activating the transducer, left ordinate scale; Ac—acoustic waveform recorded next to the animal’s head; right ordinate scale). b The same for a 45-kHz signal. c, d Frequency spectra of waveforms a and b, respectively
Source publication
The “active” cochlear mechanism of hearing manifests in the cochlear compression. Investigations of compression in odontocetes help to determine the frequency limit of the active mechanism. The compression may be evaluated by comparison of low- and on-frequency masking. In a bottlenose dolphin, forward masking of auditory evoked potentials to tonal...
Citations
The review is devoted to the mechanism of compression in the mammals auditory system. The compression provides the high sensitivity with a wide dynamic range of the auditory system, and sharpness of the frequency tuning. In this review, three main methods for detecting compression were observed: the direct registration of basilar membrane vibrations, the registration of the auditory nerve, and the psychoacoustic studies. At the end of the review, the question of the morphofunctional basis of compression in the cochlea briefly was observed.
Attention! Incorrect translation of the russian text into english. Authors apologize for this.
Forward masking was investigated by the auditory evoked potentials (AEP) method in a bottlenose dolphin Tursiops truncatus using stimulation by two successive acoustic pulses (the masker and test) projected from spatially separated sources. The positions of the two sound sources either coincided with or were symmetrical relative to the head axis at azimuths from 0 to ± 90°. AEPs were recorded either from the vertex or from the lateral head surface next to the auditory meatus. In the last case, the test source was ipsilateral to the recording side, whereas the masker source was either ipsi- or contralateral. For lateral recording, AEP release from masking (recovery) was slower for the ipsi- than for the contralateral masker source position. For vertex recording, AEP recovery was equal both for the coinciding positions of the masker and test sources and for their symmetrical positions relative to the head axis. The data indicate that at higher levels of the auditory system of the dolphin, binaural convergence makes the forward masking nearly equal for ipsi- and contralateral positions of the masker and test.
Forward masking was investigated by the auditory evoked potentials (AEP) method in a bottlenose dolphin Tursiops truncatus using stimulation by two successive acoustic pulses (the masker and test) projected from spatially separated sources. The positions of the two sound sources either coincided with or were symmetrical relative to the head axis at azimuths from 0 to ±90°. AEPs were recorded either from the vertex or from the lateral head surface next to the auditory meatus. In the last case, the test source was ipsilateral to the recording side, whereas the masker source was either ipsi- or contralateral. For lateral recording, AEP release from masking (recovery) was slower for the ipsi- than for the contralateral masker source position. For vertex recording, AEP recovery was equal both for the coinciding positions of the masker and test sources and for their symmetrical positions relative to the head axis. The data indicate that at higher levels of the auditory system of the dolphin, binaural convergence makes the forward masking nearly equal for ipsi- and contralateral positions of the masker and test.
