Examples of Indications and Contraindications for VV ECMO and VA ECMO

Examples of Indications and Contraindications for VV ECMO and VA ECMO

Source publication
Article
Full-text available
The number of patients using critical care is increasing as our populations live longer thanks to advances in medical therapies. This is reflected by an increase in both usage and number of critical care beds as compared with total hospital beds across the United States. As this aging population suffers more and more from multiorgan dysfunction, in...

Contexts in source publication

Context 1
... (VA) ECMO offers either cardiac support alone or cardiopulmonary support. Indications for VV and VA ECMO, though not an exhaustive list, are found in Table 1. Contraindications to either configuration include (1) unrecoverable myocardial damage in a patient who is not a transplant candidate, (2) disseminated malignancy, (3) known severe brain injury, (4) unwitnessed cardiac arrest, (5) prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation without adequate tissue perfusion, (6) unrepaired aortic dissection, (7) severe aortic regurgitation, (8) severe chronic organ dysfunction, and (9) peripheral vascular disease (VA ECMO). ...
Context 2
... days and contraindication to anticoagulation (ie, multitrauma at high risk of bleeding, intracranial bleeding, and so on) were also considered exclusionary. 14 A more complete list of contraindications (though again, not exhaustive) can also be found in Table 1. 6,21 Traditional indications for the initiation of CKRT include both metabolic and fluid derangements for which the kidneys are unable to compensate (ie, acidosis, electrolyte disturbances, intoxications, uremia, fluid overload [FO]). ...

Citations

... Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is a treatment modality that provides hemodialysis function around the clock. Compared with intermittent hemodialysis, CRRT plays an important role in maintaining hemodynamic stability and removing metabolic waste and cytotoxins from the body [6,7]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Objective This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of polymyxin B in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by multi-drug resistant bacteria, and to analyze the effect of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) on pharmacokinetics of polymyxin B. Methods Thirty-five patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by multi-drug resistant bacteria admitted to our hospital from June 2021 to January 2022 were selected as the subjects. The patients were divided into the standard group (n = 20) and the non-standard group (n = 15) based on the factors affecting the compliance of polymyxin B plasma concentration. The patients received with polymyxin B and the plasma concentration was monitored. According to the monitoring results, they were divided into the standard group and the non-standard group, to analyze the influencing factors of polymyxin B on the blood concentration. Besides, the patients were then divided into the control group (n = 28) and the observation group (n = 7) according to whether the patients received CRRT treatment. Patients in the control group treated with polymyxin B alone, while patients in the observation group received with polymyxin B and CRRT. The general data of patients in the two groups were compared. The levels of plasma concentration of polymyxin B measured before the next administration (Cmin), peak plasma concentration of polymyxin B measured immediately after end of infusion (Cmax) and intermediate plasma concentration measured 6 h after administration (midpoint of the dosing interval) (C1/2t) were detected and compared between the two groups. Correlation between pharmacokinetics and efficacy was analyzed by Spearman correlation. The incidence of complications and the 28-day mortality rate of the two groups were recorded. Results The age, body mass index (BMI) and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) scores in the non-standard group were higher than these in the standard group (p < 0.05). BMI and APACHE II scores were independent risk factors affecting the pharmacokinetics of polymyxin B in patients with severe pulmonary infection (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in age, BMI, APACHEII score, alanine aminotransferase level, aspartate aminotransferase level, albumin level, gender and diabetes ratio between the control group and the observation group (p > 0.05). The levels of Cmin, Cmax, and C1/2t in the observation group were lower than these in the control group (p < 0.001). The response rate was 50.00% in the control group and 36.36% in the observation group (p > 0.05). The levels of Cmin, Cmax, and C1/2t in the observation group were no significant correlation with the clinical efficacy (p > 0.05), while these in the control group were positive correlation with the clinical efficacy (r = 0.485, p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of skin pigmentation, nephrotoxicity and 28-day mortality between the two groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion In patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia not receiving multidrug-resistant bacteria, the rate of achieving blood drug concentration with the usual recommended dose of polymyxin B was satisfactory. However, the proportion of patients with a 6-h plasma concentration exceeding the maximum plasma concentration was high. BMI and APACHE II scores were important factors affecting the pharmacokinetics of polymyxin B. In patients undergoing CRRT, the plasma concentration of polymyxin B was significantly reduced, suggesting that in patients with severe disease, plasma concentration monitoring played an important role in drug efficacy and patient safety. In patients treated with CRRT, the dose of polymyxin B may need to be increased.
Article
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) provides temporary cardiorespiratory support for neonatal, pediatric, and adult patients when traditional management has failed. This lifesaving therapy has intrinsic risks, including the development of a robust inflammatory response, acute kidney injury (AKI), fluid overload (FO), and blood loss via consumption and coagulopathy. Continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT) has been proposed to reduce these side effects by mitigating the host inflammatory response and controlling FO, improving outcomes in patients requiring ECMO. The Pediatric Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy (PCRRT) Workgroup and the International Collaboration of Nephrologists and Intensivists for Critical Care Children (ICONIC) met to highlight current practice standards for ECMO use within the pediatric population. This review discusses ECMO modalities, the pathophysiology of inflammation during an ECMO run, its adverse effects, various anticoagulation strategies, and the technical aspects and outcomes of implementing CKRT during ECMO in neonatal and pediatric populations. Consensus practice points and guidelines are summarized. ECMO should be utilized in patients with severe acute respiratory failure despite the use of conventional treatment modalities. The Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) offers guidelines for ECMO initiation and management while maintaining a clinical registry of over 195,000 patients to assess outcomes and complications. Monitoring and preventing fluid overload during ECMO and CKRT are imperative to reduce mortality risk. Clinical evidence, resources, and experience of the nephrologist and healthcare team should guide the selection of ECMO circuit.
Article
Background Pediatric patients requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) may require renal replacement therapy even after decannulation. However, data regarding transition from ECMO cannulation to a hemodialysis catheter in pediatric patients is not currently available. Methods Patients <18 years old who had an ECMO cannula exchanged for a hemodialysis catheter during decannulation at a tertiary care children’s center from January 2011 to September 2022 were identified. Data was collected from the electronic medical record. Results A total of 10 patients were included. The cohort was predominantly male (80.0%, n = 8) with a median age of 1 day (IQR 1.0, 24.0). All ECMO cannulations were veno-arterial in the right common carotid artery and internal jugular vein. The median time on ECMO was 8.5 days (IQR 6.0, 15.0). One patient had the venous cannula exchanged for a tunneled hemodialysis catheter during decannulation, two were transitioned to peritoneal dialysis, and seven had the temporary hemodialysis catheter converted to a tunneled catheter by Interventional Radiology (when permanent access was required) at a median time of 10 days (IQR 8.0, 12.5). Of these 7 patients, 28.6% (n = 2) developed catheter-associated infection within 30 days of replacement, with one requiring catheter replacement. Transient bloodstream infection occurred in 10.0% (n = 1) within 30 days of ECMO cannula exchange. Conclusion Venous ECMO cannula exchange for a hemodialysis catheter in children requiring renal replacement therapy after decannulation is possible as a bridge to a permanent hemodialysis or peritoneal catheter if renal function does not recover, while supporting vein preservation.
Article
Background: Extracorporeal organ assist devices provide lifesaving functions for acutely and chronically ill patients suffering from respiratory and renal failure, but their availability and use is severely limited by an extremely high level of operational complexity. While current hollow fiber-based devices provide high efficiency blood gas transfer and waste removal in ExtraCorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) and hemodialysis, respectively, their impact on blood health is often highly deleterious and difficult to control. Further challenges are encountered when integrating multiple organ support functions, as is often required when ECMO and ultrafiltration are combined to deal with fluid overload in critically ill patients, necessitating an unwieldy circuit containing two separate cartridges. Methods: We report the first laboratory demonstration of simultaneous blood gas oxygenation and fluid removal in single microfluidic circuit, an achievement enabled by the microchannel-based blood flow configuration of the device. Porcine blood is flowed through a stack of two microfluidic layers, one with a non-porous, gas-permeable silicone membrane separating blood and oxygen chambers, and the other containing a porous dialysis membrane separating blood and filtrate compartments. Results: High levels of oxygen transfer are measured across the oxygenator, while tunable rates of fluid removal, governed by the transmembrane pressure, are achieved across the ultrafiltration layer. Key parameters including the blood flow rate, transmembrane pressure and hematocrit are monitored and compared with computationally predicted performance metrics. Conclusions: These results represent a model demonstration of a potential future clinical therapy where respiratory support and fluid removal are both realized through a single monolithic cartridge.