Equilibrium position of the electron and nuclear magnetization vectors for each sub-lattice.

Contexts in source publication

Context 1

... the antiferromagnet MnCO 3 considered here, this anisotropy is the easy-plane which corresponds to the con- dition K > 0. The Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction which is responsible for non-collinearity of the M 1 and M 2 sub- lattices, see Fig. 3, is described ...

Context 2

... h(t)=0, the condition of minimum of the functional (14) defines the equilibrium orientation of the vectors M 1,2 and m 1,2 , see Fig. 3. The small angle ψ in this figure is deter- mined from the ...

Context 3

... equilibrium orientations due to rf magnetic field at frequencies close to the q-NMR resonance. Following the previous work, 53 it is convenient to introduce a separate ref- erence frame x 1 y 1 y 1 (x 2 y 2 z 2 ) for sublattice M 1 (M 2 ) obtained from the original frame xyz by a clockwise rotation around z- axis by angle ψ (by angle π − ψ), see Fig. 3, and chose new variables according ...

Context 4

... magneti- zation vector m = (m ξ , m η , m ζ ), whose ratio is approximately γ e /γ n 10 3 , the main contribution to the observed ac magne- tization comes from the oscillations of vector M. We can find needed relations using relation between the complex ampli- tudes of M ξ (t) and m ξ (t), as given by Eq. (A.7-A.9) in the Appendix. According to Fig. 3 and Eqs. (20-22), the vector component of electron magnetization M (t) h(t), which defines the ob- served NMR signals, can be expressed in terms of M ξ (t) ...