Figure - available from: Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Electrophysiological study and mapping data in case 1. A During electrophysiological study, ventricular tachycardia with the same rate as in intracardiac defibrillator recordings ICD recordings is induced. Twelve lead ECG suggests apical septal inferior exit. B Endocardial map of the left ventricle is seen in left anterior oblique view. The image was obtained using the CARTO® 3 three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping system (Biosense Webster, Diamond Bar, CA, USA) using a transventricular approach in a patient who underwent mechanical double valve replacement. After a mini thoracotomy (C), the three-dimensional electroanatomic maps of epicardium by Decanav® Mapping Catheter (Biosense Webster, Diamond Bar, CA, USA) are created (D). Scar regions (< 0.5 mV) are defined with red color and abnormal electrograms are seen at the bottom of the figure
Source publication
Background
Stereotactic body radioablation therapy (SBRT) has recently been introduced with the ability to provide ablative energy noninvasively to arrhythmogenic substrate while reducing damage to normal cardiac tissue nearby and minimizing patients’ procedural risk. There is still debate regarding whether SBRT has a predominant effect in the earl...
Similar publications
Introduction:
Cardiac radioablation (CR) is a noninvasive treatment option for patients with refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT) during which high doses of radiation, typically 25 Gy, are delivered to myocardial scar. In this study, we investigate motion from cardiac cycle and evaluate the dosimetric impact in a cohort of patients treated with...
Citations
... Since 2014, several case reports on stereotactic radiotherapy for VT have been published. [4][5][6][7][8][9] A systematic review published in 2021 revealed the safety and short-term reduction in sustained VT/VF burden. 10 To implement this method in Japan, the technique needs to be converted to one that can be implemented in Japan, and the safety of the method should be clarified in Japanese patients. ...
Background
Currently, the standard curative treatment for ventricular tachycardia (VT) and ventricular fibrillation (VF) is radiofrequency catheter ablation. However, when the VT circuit is deep in the myocardium, the catheter may not be delivered, and a new, minimally invasive treatment using different energies is desired.
Methods
This is a protocol paper for a feasibility study designed to provide stereotactic radiotherapy for refractory VT not cured by catheter ablation after at least one catheter ablation. The primary end point is to evaluate the short-term safety of this treatment and the secondary endpoint is to evaluate its efficacy as assessed by the reduction in VT episode. Cyberknife M6 radiosurgery system will be used for treatment, and the prescribed dose to the target will be 25Gy in one fraction. The study will be conducted on three patients.
Conclusion
Since catheter ablation is the only treatment option for VT that is covered by insurance in Japan, there is currently no other treatment for VT/VF that cannot be cured by catheter ablation. We hope that this feasibility study will provide hope for patients who are currently under the stress of ICD activation.
Trial registration
The study has been registered in the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs042230030).
... 18,[49][50][51] Although some teams subsequently reported less marked improvements, cardiac SBRT has emerged as a promising ablative therapy with a growing number of case series reporting the effectiveness of the technique in reducing the burden or eliminating VAs refractory to conventional therapies. 17,20,[52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62] Regarding quality of life, significant improvement in perceived health change and social functioning has been highlighted after cardiac SBRT for refractory VAs. 18,49,62 Short-term safety profile of cardiac SBRT also appears favorable, although long-term data are needed. ...
Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation is an established treatment for patients with advanced heart failure refractory to medical therapy. However, the incidence of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) is high in this population, both in the acute and delayed phases after implantation. About one‐third of patients implanted with an LVAD will experience sustained VAs, predisposing these patients to worse outcomes and complicating patient management. The combination of pre‐existing myocardial substrate and complex electrical remodeling after LVAD implantation account for the high incidence of VAs observed in this population. LVAD patients presenting VAs refractory to antiarrhythmic therapy and catheter ablation procedures are not rare. In such patients, treatment options are extremely limited. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a technique that delivers precise and high doses of radiation to highly defined targets, reducing exposure to adjacent normal tissue. Cardiac SBRT has recently emerged as a promising alternative with a growing number of case series reporting the effectiveness of the technique in reducing the VA burden in patients with arrhythmias refractory to conventional therapies. The safety profile of cardiac SBRT also appears favorable, even though the current clinical experience remains limited. The use of cardiac SBRT for the treatment of refractory VAs in patients implanted with an LVAD are even more scarce. This review summarizes the clinical experience of cardiac SBRT in LVAD patients and describes technical considerations related to the implementation of the SBRT procedure in the presence of an LVAD.
... Since 2012, several case reports on stereotactic radiotherapy for VT have been published. [6][7][8][9] A systematic review published in 2021 revealed the safety and short-term reduction in sustained VT/VF burden. 10 To implement this method in Japan, the technique needs to be converted to one that can be implemented in Japan, and the safety of the method should be clarified in Japanese patients. ...
Background: Currently, the standard curative treatment for ventricular tachycardia (VT) and ventricular fibrillation (VF) is radiofrequency catheter ablation. However, when the VT circuit is deep in the myocardium, the catheter may not be delivered, and a new, minimally invasive treatment using different energies is desired.
Methods: This is a protocol paper for a feasibility study designed to provide stereotactic radiotherapy for refractory VT not cured by catheter ablation after at least one catheter ablation. The primary end point is to evaluate the short-term safety of this treatment and the secondary endpoint is to evaluate its efficacy as assessed by the reduction in VT episode. Cyberknife M6 radiosurgery system will be used for treatment, and the prescribed dose to the target will be 25Gy in one fraction. The study will be conducted on three patients.
Conclusion: Since catheter ablation is the only treatment option for VT that is covered by insurance in Japan, there is currently no other treatment for VT/VF that cannot be cured by catheter ablation. We hope that this feasibility study will provide hope for patients who are currently under the stress of ICD activation.
Trial registration: The study has been registered in the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs042230030).
... In a retrospective study (n=8), the highest arrhythmic benefit in terms of VT burden and ICD interventions was in 2 weeks to 3 months after SBRT, perhaps due to transcription and eventual replacement of gap junctions over time after SBRT. 63 The authors surmised SBRT should be considered as a bailout strategy or bridge therapy until heart transplantation in refractory cases. ...
Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with ischaemic and non-ischaemic cardiomyopathies. In most patients, the primary strategy of VT catheter ablation is based on the identification of critical components of reentry circuits and modification of abnormal substrate which can initiate reentry. Despite technological advancements in catheter design and improved ability to localise abnormal substrates, putative circuits and site of origins of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs), current technologies remain inadequate and durable success may be elusive when the critical substrate is deep or near to critical structures that are at risk of collateral damage. In this article, we review the available and potential future non-surgical investigational approaches for treatment of VAs and discuss the viability of these modalities.
... I look forward to in vivo data from this group, as do Tschabrunn and Frankel, who nicely comment on this study in their editorial [15]. Lastly, Aras and colleagues add to the growing body of literature on VT stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with their single-center study of 8 patients in whom suppression of VT seemed most prominent in the first 3 months post-SBRT, with questionable long-term efficacy [16]. ...
Ventricular arrhythmias (VA) can be life‐threatening arrhythmias that result in significant morbidity and mortality. Catheter ablation (CA) is an invasive treatment modality that can be effective in the treatment of VA where medications fail. Recurrence occurs commonly following CA due to an inability to deliver lesions of adequate depth to cauterise the electrical circuits that drive VA or reach areas of scar responsible for VA. Stereotactic body radiotherapy is a non‐invasive treatment modality that allows volumetric delivery of energy to treat circuits that cannot be reached by CA. It overcomes the weaknesses of CA and has been successfully utilised in small clinical trials to treat refractory VA. This article summarises the current evidence for this novel treatment modality and the steps that will be required to bring it to the forefront of VA treatment.
Background
Respiratory motion management strategies are used to minimize the effects of breathing on the precision of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for ventricular tachycardia, but the extent of cardiac contractile motion of the human heart has not been systematically explored.
Objective
We aim to assess the magnitude of cardiac contractile motion between different directions and locations in the heart.
Methods
Patients with intracardiac leads or valves who underwent 4-dimensional cardiac computed tomography (CT) prior to a catheter ablation procedure for atrial or ventricular arrhythmias at 2 medical centers were studied retrospectively. The displacement of transvenous right atrial appendage, right ventricular (RV) implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, coronary sinus lead tips, and prosthetic cardiac devices across the cardiac cycle were measured in orthogonal 3-dimensional views on a maximal-intensity projection CT reconstruction.
Results
A total of 31 preablation cardiac 4-dimensional cardiac CT scans were analyzed. The LV lead tip had significantly greater motion compared with the RV lead in the anterior-posterior direction (6.0 ± 2.2 mm vs 3.8 ± 1.7 mm; P = .01) and superior-inferior direction (4.4 ± 2.9 mm vs 3.5 ± 2.0 mm; P = .049). The prosthetic aortic valves had the least movement of all fiducials, specifically compared with the RV lead tip in the left-right direction (3.2 ± 1.2 mm vs 6.1 ± 3.8 mm, P = .04) and the LV lead tip in the anterior-posterior direction (3.8 ± 1.7 mm vs 6.0 ± 2.2 mm, P = .03).
Conclusion
The degree of cardiac contractile motion varies significantly (1 mm to 15.2 mm) across different locations in the heart. The effect of contractile motion on the precision of radiotherapy should be assessed on a patient-specific basis.
Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is an important type of arrhythmia with a risk of sudden death. Although implanted cardiac defibrillation and radiofrequency ablation are used together with medical treatments for VT, the treatment options are limited in cases that do not respond to them. Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) applied to VT substrates in resistant cases is an emerging treatment with positive results. Such clinical results have increased the interest in this subject. However, the ideal treatment device and method have not yet been described for this therapy, which is generally applied at a single fraction using various devices and methods. Herein, treatment planning was conducted for a total of 8 patients (11 VT substrates) using the Varian TrueBeam EDGE and TomoTherapy Radixact devices at a single center, and the results were compared dosimetrically. The Wilcoxon-signed rank test was used for the statistical analysis, and mean values were expressed as medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs). In the volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and helical tomotherapy (HT) plans, the plan coverages and conformity indexes were similar; meanwhile, the homogeneity indexes were 0.10 (IQR = 0.05) and 0.07 (IQR = 0.05), respectively, and were significantly better in the HT plan (p = 0.02). The gradient indexes were 3.18 (IQR = 0.8) and 5.33 (IQR = 3.68) in the VMAT and HT plans, respectively, and were significantly better in the VMAT plan. For the organs at risk, similar doses were observed. The maximum doses for the stomach and esophagus and the mean doses for the left lung and both lungs were significantly lower in the VMAT plan. Similarly, the maximum and mean doses for the cardiac substructures and great vessels were significantly lower in the VMAT plan. More homogeneous plans were obtained in HT, while a faster dose reduction and lower critical organ dose were observed in VMAT. Reasonable myocardial SABR plans could be obtained with both techniques. The effects of the dosimetric differences on the clinical outcomes should be evaluated in prospective clinical studies.
Background: Cardiac radiotherapy using stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has attracted attention as a minimally invasive treatment for refractory ventricular tachycardia. However, a standardized protocol and software program for determining the irradiation target have not been established. Here, we report the first preclinical stereotactic radioregulation antiarrhythmic therapy trial in Japan, focused on the target-setting process.
Methods and Results: From 2019 onwards, 3 patients (age range 60–91 years) presenting with ischemic or non-ischemic cardiomyopathy were enrolled. Two patients were extremely serious and urgent, and were followed up for 6 and 30 months. To determine the irradiation targets, we aggregated electrophysiological, structural, and functional data and reflected them in an American Heart Association 17-segment model, as per the current recommendations. However, in all 3 patients, invasive electrophysiological study, phase-contrast computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging could not be performed; therefore, electrophysiological and structural information was limited. As alternatives, high-resolution ambulatory electrocardiography and nuclear medicine studies were useful in assessing arrhythmic substrates; however, concerns regarding test weighting and multiple scoring remain. Risks to surrounding organs were fully taken into account.
Conclusions: In patients requiring cardiac SBRT, the information needed for target planning is sometimes limited to minimally invasive tests. Although there are issues to be resolved, this is a promising option for the life-saving treatment of patients in critical situations.
