Fig 3 - uploaded by Supriya Chakrabarti
Content may be subject to copyright.
Each detector image shows the nuller (low frequency fringes) and the auxiliary interferometer (high frequency fringes) output. In image (a) the left side of the nuller output (bounding box labled L) is nulled, the right side of the nuller output (bounding box labeled R) is near the midfringe intensity, and the fringe patterns in the auxiliary interferometer (labeled d and s for delay and static, respectively) appear to be nearly aligned. Note that only partial fringes are sampled inside the bounding boxes. In image (b) the delay line is positioned to null the right half of the nuller output, whereas the left null bounding box intensity is near midfringe. The shift in the delay line is evidenced by the downward shift of its fringes from image (a) to (b). 

Each detector image shows the nuller (low frequency fringes) and the auxiliary interferometer (high frequency fringes) output. In image (a) the left side of the nuller output (bounding box labled L) is nulled, the right side of the nuller output (bounding box labeled R) is near the midfringe intensity, and the fringe patterns in the auxiliary interferometer (labeled d and s for delay and static, respectively) appear to be nearly aligned. Note that only partial fringes are sampled inside the bounding boxes. In image (b) the delay line is positioned to null the right half of the nuller output, whereas the left null bounding box intensity is near midfringe. The shift in the delay line is evidenced by the downward shift of its fringes from image (a) to (b). 

Source publication
Article
Full-text available
We describe a white light fringe scanning and pupil bisecting method of measuring the optical path difference (OPD) between arms of a monolithic nulling interferometer that is designed to enable direct imaging of planetary companions and the environments around nearby stars. This measurement is used to determine the differential thicknesses of opti...

Contexts in source publication

Context 1
... d s where left and right null refer to the relative positions of the nuller output pupils observed on the monitor. It should be noted that the a change of sign from the left to right side of the above map indicates a reversal of pupil location at the output relative to the input for a given beam. An auxilliary alignment and phasing interferometer (shown in red and purple in Fig. 2) was included in the optical layout to ensure that the phase delayed beams were parallel when in- jected into the monolith. The zero OPD search space was increased by tilting M2 to produce a high fringe count across the auxilliary interferometer pupil. After completing these steps, the laser was replaced with a halogen source. The SMA and DLA were then successively positioned at zero OPD relative to M2 in order to make white light fringes observable in either half of the auxilliary interferometer pupil (see Fig. 3). Once the beams were aligned and coarsely phased, the DLA was scanned with a long period triangle wave signal. Images of the time varying intensities were taken over many scan periods to mitigate environmental effects. To determine the white light fringe spacing in physical units, a small amount of tilt was added to the input beams such that the fringe pattern observed in the nuller output resembled those observed in the auxiliary interferometer shown in Fig. 3. Images of the fringes produced by the halogen source, and then the red HeNe were recorded. The pixel intensities were summed in each row in one nuller output pupil half for both light sources in order to generate a 1D intensity signal versus row number. Peaks were then located in the Fourier transforms of these signals to calculate per pixel fringe spacings, ζ halogen and ζ 632.8 , the ratio of which is used to recover the white light central ...
Context 2
... d s where left and right null refer to the relative positions of the nuller output pupils observed on the monitor. It should be noted that the a change of sign from the left to right side of the above map indicates a reversal of pupil location at the output relative to the input for a given beam. An auxilliary alignment and phasing interferometer (shown in red and purple in Fig. 2) was included in the optical layout to ensure that the phase delayed beams were parallel when in- jected into the monolith. The zero OPD search space was increased by tilting M2 to produce a high fringe count across the auxilliary interferometer pupil. After completing these steps, the laser was replaced with a halogen source. The SMA and DLA were then successively positioned at zero OPD relative to M2 in order to make white light fringes observable in either half of the auxilliary interferometer pupil (see Fig. 3). Once the beams were aligned and coarsely phased, the DLA was scanned with a long period triangle wave signal. Images of the time varying intensities were taken over many scan periods to mitigate environmental effects. To determine the white light fringe spacing in physical units, a small amount of tilt was added to the input beams such that the fringe pattern observed in the nuller output resembled those observed in the auxiliary interferometer shown in Fig. 3. Images of the fringes produced by the halogen source, and then the red HeNe were recorded. The pixel intensities were summed in each row in one nuller output pupil half for both light sources in order to generate a 1D intensity signal versus row number. Peaks were then located in the Fourier transforms of these signals to calculate per pixel fringe spacings, ζ halogen and ζ 632.8 , the ratio of which is used to recover the white light central ...

Similar publications

Article
Full-text available
A highly sensitive strain sensor is demonstrated by introducing a photonic crystal fiber (PCF) Mach-Zehnder interferometer (MZI) in a cavity ringdown fiber loop as a sensing element. The MZI is fabricated by splicing a short length of PCF between two single-mode fibers with collapsed air holes over a short region at two splicing points, which allow...

Citations

Chapter
Roughly four decades following the first printing of Nicolas Copernicus’s De revolutionibus orbium coelestium and three decades prior to Galileo’s 1609 discovery of the four major Jovian moons, Giordano Bruno posited in De l’infinito universo et mondi that the stars in the sky were really other suns like our own, and that they too had planets which orbited them. Isaac Newton would echo this line of thinking in his 1713 General Scholium. Today we refer to these bodies as exoplanets. Without examples to suggest otherwise, one might expect these alien worlds orbiting distant stars to resemble the terrestrial and gas giants we are familiar with in our own Solar System.
Chapter
This chapter is a top level treatment of system level considerations concerning high-contrast imaging coronagraphy from various approaches. Considerations include target properties and their effect on fundamental imaging requirements such as resolution, bandpass and contrast. I compare the advantages and disadvantages of observing from the ground, balloons, rockets, and satellites. I outline different methods of starlight suppression presently being explored and compare them based on the crucial performance metrics of spatial and chromatic response. I present components for wavefront control and techniques for wavefront sensing. Finally, a brief overview of efforts that have been undertaken to implement these systems is given.
Conference Paper
We present a monolithic multispectral camera (MMC) for high contrast direct imaging of inner exoplanetary environments. The primary scientific goal of the camera is to enable eight color characterization of jovian exoplanets and interplanetary dust and debris distributions around nearby stars. Technological highlights of the design include: 1. Diffraction limited resolution at 350 nm through active optical aberration correction; 2. Greater than million-to-one contrast at narrow star separation using interferometry and post-processing techniques; 3. Demonstration of deep broadband interferometric nulling and interband image stability through the use of monolithic optical assemblies; 4. Optimization of multispectral throughput while minimizing components.
Article
Full-text available
We present progress in the development of the monolithic achromatic nulling interference coronagraph (MANIC), an optic designed for enabling direct detection and characterization of exoplanetary systems around nearby stars. MANIC is a fully symmetric implementation of a rotational shearing interferometer consisting of fused quartz prisms and a symmetric beamsplitter optically contacted in an arrangement that geometrically flips the fields in the TR and RT arms about orthogonal axes such that upon recombination, a centro-symmetric, theoretically achromatic null is produced. In addition to a small inner working angle (1λ/D), built-in alignment and stability are inherent benefits of the compact monolithic design, which make MANIC a competitive alternative to conventional discrete element nullers proposed for imaging exoplanetary environments. Following MANIC's initial fabrication, the path error between its TR and RT arms was measured. This measurement was used to fabricate compensator plates of varying thicknesses that were bonded to the optic to reduce dispersion imbalance, thereby improving broadband nulling performance. In performing this correction, initial OPD was reduced from 949 ± 44 nm to 63 ± 10 nm, which in the absence of any other asymmetries, corresponds to an increase in a 10 7 R-band (λ c = 648 nm) nulling bandpass from monochromatic to 25%, or at the 10 6 level, from 5% to 50%. Current benchtop laser and polychromatic nulling strategies are described. The potential science return from using MANIC on a sub-orbital platform is discussed.