Figure 4 - uploaded by Yopi Prabowo Oktiovan
Content may be subject to copyright.
Contexts in source publication
Context 1
... process of the safety assessment begins with the generation of the cellar system geometry using a parametric design tool called Rhino+Grasshopper using the inputs from Figure 2. The geometry generation tool contains C# scripts for fast and robust design of the vaulted masonry units. The discretization of the case study model is shown in Figure 4. masonry units are modeled with extended dimensions to account for half of the mortar joint thickness on all sides. ...
Context 2
... shown in Figure 4, only half of the left-and right-side arches are modeled to save computational time. The bottom-most of both piers are fixed and to simulate the symmetric conditions at both ends of the arches, non-physical rigid blocks are attached to the arches with frictionless contacts between the blocks and the vault elements. ...
Context 3
... process of the safety assessment begins with the generation of the cellar system geometry using a parametric design tool called Rhino+Grasshopper using the inputs from Figure 2. The geometry generation tool contains C# scripts for fast and robust design of the vaulted masonry units. The discretization of the case study model is shown in Figure 4. masonry units are modeled with extended dimensions to account for half of the mortar joint thickness on all sides. ...
Context 4
... shown in Figure 4, only half of the left-and right-side arches are modeled to save computational time. The bottom-most of both piers are fixed and to simulate the symmetric conditions at both ends of the arches, non-physical rigid blocks are attached to the arches with frictionless contacts between the blocks and the vault elements. ...
