Table 5 - uploaded by Einat Metzl
Content may be subject to copyright.
Source publication
Contexts in source publication
Context 1
... Comparison of greater and lesser financial disparity on well-being measures.......……..49 Table 2. Means, standard deviations, and intercorrelations for well-being and extroversion …...51 Table 3. Means, standard deviations, and intercorrelations for extroversion and originality…….51 Table 4. Correlation Matrix for African American participants' .....……………………………..52 Table 5. Correlation matix for Caucasian participants……………………………………….......53 Table 6. ...
Context 2
... gender, ethnicity, extroversion, originality, and flexibility were taken as predictors for the three dependent variables -life satisfaction, clinical stress, and well-being composite. The number of life events and income were included in the original GLM (Table 56, Appendix G) but taken out after it was a non-significant predictor when other variables taken into account. ...
Context 3
... models (presented in full in Tables 56-58 In addition, significant main effects were found for gender, extroversion, and flexibility on life satisfaction, and originality reached a close to significance main effect. Three significant interactions were also found. ...
Context 4
... the last model (see Table 58, Appendix G) ethnicity, extroversion, originality, and flexibility were taken as predictors for the three dependent variables. The model is significant (p < 0.05) for all three dependent variables -well-being composite, life satisfaction, and clinical stress -with respective adjusted R 2 scores 0.148, 0.196, and 0.166, thus explaining 15, 20, and 16.5 percent of their variance respectfully. ...
