Figure 3 - uploaded by Ximing Yin
Content may be subject to copyright.
Source publication
Similar publications
Zusammenfassung
Der Innovationsprozess im Unternehmen beginnt mit einer strategischen Orientierung und der Problemidentifizierung. In der strategischen Orientierung werden langfristige Ziele in Bezug auf Innovation gesetzt. In der Problemidentifizierung wird ermittelt, welche Probleme aus Kundensicht das Unternehmen grundsätzlich adressieren soll.
Citations
... Theory of Economic Development, published in 1912(Chen Yin.,2019) Innovation is a change in how we approach a task or the successful implementation of new ideas or discoveries. It could be a drastic or progressive development.Lee., (2016)The success of innovation processes in knowledge management has grown in popularity as a research issue over the past ten years, particularly about radical innovations in thinking, products, processes, or organizations ( Lee., 2016)According toZia et al., (2017)Innovation is the "act of introducing something new and refers to novel ideas as well as novel products and procedures. ...
Purpose: This study aims to examine and investigate the main sources of knowledge acquisition for individuals at the middle management levels and determine the relationship (degree of correlation and influence) between the variables of the study Theoretical framework: Recent and future studies literature reported the need for, knowledge acquisition takes place, and the best methods are those that come from outside sources such as partners, competitors, suppliers, and customers, as best practices when compared to other institutions. Design/methodology/approach: this study used the scientific methodology based on knowledge analysis, it used a questionnaire that was created taking into account the scientific requirements, Two main hypotheses have been developed. And it consisted of a sample of individuals who depended on learning new things, most similar to knowledge processes. The second organizational level of the General Traffic Department and (63) other individuals were used to generate this sample and adopted computer statistics (SPSS. V. 24) to analyze and process data and information Findings: The results concluded and found that the variables of acquiring knowledge and open innovation had a positive correlation and impact, as the variable (partners) obtained the highest correlation value. Research, Practical & Social implications: Managers can find new visions and indicators for applying the knowledge acquisition system, and identifying their impact on achieving open innovation. Originality/value: The value of the study is to enhance the understanding of the literature related to The Relationship Between Main Sources of Knowledge Acquisition And Open Innovation by analysis, and provides an applied conception.
... Drucker (2014), denominou o conceito como a ferramenta do empreendedor para converter mudanças em oportunidades de serviço e negócios, tornando a inovação uma prática, campo acadêmico ou disciplina. Assim, a inovação como uma aglomeração de procedimentos incluídos na génese, design, pesquisa e desenvolvimento, produção e venda de novas ideias e pensamentos baseados na comercialização de um país ou empresa no mercado global para ganhar vantagem competitiva (Chen & Yin, 2019). Drucker (2014), descreve a capacidade de transformar empreendimento, conhecimento, previsão e tecnologia em riqueza para obter valor comercial. ...
... As estratégias corporativas de longo prazo precisam retratar o posicionamento relacionado a funções relevantes dentro da organização. Finalmente, os gerentes seniores precisam comprometer seu tempo e recursos para apoiar programas inovadores (Chen & Yin, 2019 (2011), as empresas devem procurar criar mercadorias e serviços para vender com margens de lucro substanciais, mesmo que resultando em impactos adversos, como deterioração da saúde ou poluição. O modelo de lucro proposto por Osterwalder e Pigneur (2011), enfatiza a necessidade de maximizar os lucros em vez de realizar análises de consequências para resolver problemas no ambiente de negócios. ...
... A Toyota usou a inovação através do Lean Startup para alcançar a globalização, e este tem sido principalmente o modelo inovador na Ásia (Chen & Yin, 2019). Roldan Correa (2019) afirma que a empresa se concentra na busca de feedback dos trabalhadores, iteração rápida e fabricação de pequenos pontos. ...
Introdução/Problematização: o desenvolvimento global impulsionou o mundo para uma nova era de comércio internacional. Empresas multinacionais tornam-se cada vez mais robustas e presentes na economia internacional, fazendo com que os países enfrentem desafios para desenvolver a sua economia e desenvolver as industrias nacionais. A inovação aparece, assim, como uma possível resposta a estes desafios, proporcionando vias alternativas para o desenvolvimento e recuperação de industrias e empresas. Objetivo/proposta: a presente investigação procura analisar um compilado de casos de estudo pertinentes, que demonstram como países e empresas utilizaram métodos e ferramentas de inovação para tornarem-se mais competitivos frente aos desafios da economia global. Foram também apresentadas as estruturas e métodos de inovação disponíveis no mundo moderno, as suas aplicações e como ajudaram os países e empresas apresentados a alcançar a competitividade global. Procedimentos Metodológicos: foi utilizada a metodologia de revisão sistemática de literatura. Para tal, foram selecionados oito casos de estudo pertinentes, nos quais países e empresas aplicaram estruturas e metodologias de inovação frente a desafios criados pela globalização e competitividade global. Principais Resultados: Foram identificadas diversas estruturas de inovação, nomeadamente a inovação em rede, em estrutura, aberta, de processo e modelo de lucro. Além disso, foram apresentadas também uma série de ferramentas e frameworks, incluindo o ágil, design thinking, lean start-up, entre outras. Nos casos apresentados, países e empresas adotaram estas estruturas e ferramentas de diversas formas, obtendo resultados positivos quanto a sua competitividade global e desenvolvimento interno. Considerações Finais/Conclusão: através dos casos apresentados foi possível perceber que a inovação é uma resposta robusta aos desafios da globalização. Em todos os casos, as estruturas e metodologias adotadas levaram ao desenvolvimento de industrias locais e externas ou aumento da competitividade e criação de vias alternativas através das quais países e empresas puderam manter ou desenvolver vantagens competitivas frente a presença de multinacionais. Contribuições do Trabalho: os efeitos da globalização são amplamente discutidos em diversos vieses, como político, económico e social. Esta investigação procurou analisar uma possível resposta para a questão "o que se fazer para manter a competitividade em um mundo globalizado?". Apesar de limitado pelo seu escopo, o estudo apresenta uma robusta compilação de estruturas, métodos e as suas aplicações, com exemplos práticos através da análise de casos de estudo.
... HI is a total and collaborative innovation driven by strategic vision in today's open innovation era. This new innovation paradigm is a helix of strategic innovation, collaborative innovation, total innovation and open innovation, which reflects both the innovation practice in Chinese context and the wisdom from eastern culture (Chen and Miller, 2010;Chen and Yin, 2019b;Chen et al., 2020a). HI is an original theoretical paradigm to understand the national innovation system trend that driven by the central and national government's strategic actions for catching up as well as keep national advantages Edquist, 2019). ...
... Taken together, HI paradigm provides a new STI policy design perspective based on the global view (Chen and Yin, 2019b;Edquist, 2019). Innovation policy should not be limited to science and technology. ...
... Standing on the new stage of China's reform and opening up, China have to produce more indigenous innovation instead of buying from outside or just copying the western countries and improve the dual model of combing its own capability building with acquiring knowledge from all over the world. The nation has to balance the paradox of open innovation and indigenous innovation (Chen and Ku, 2014;Chen and Yin, 2019b;Chen et al., 2020a). The concept of open innovation has recently gained widespread attention (Chesbrough, 2003;Lichtenthaler, 2011;Kankanhalli et al., 2017). ...
Over the past century and a half, global technological leadership has shifted from Europe to the United States, while scholars argue that the world has seen that it is now shifting from the United States to China due to China’s extraordinary catch-up in the past four decades, in which the public policy-oriented national innovation system development plays a critical role that might provide an alternative way for innovation-driven development especially for emerging markets. Even though encountering many challenges ahead, China is positioning itself to take over the global innovation leadership in the next few decades. Here in this article, we introduce a serious yet underexplored question: could China go beyond catch-up and become the global innovation powerhouse? Specifically, drawing from the holistic innovation perspective, which is an original theoretical paradigm for the mission-oriented innovation policy change, this article critically reviews, both qualitatively and quantitatively, China’s remarkable innovation progress and main drivers in comparison with G7 countries plus South Korea and India, trying to provide a comprehensive and critical view of state-of-the-art research on China’s innovation catch-up. We further explore the five major challenges that China must take seriously when marching toward the global innovation powerhouse. Finally, we propose a mission-oriented holistic STI policy design framework for both China and other emerging economies to go beyond catch-up in a competitive dynamic world. This article provides a new and holistic perspective to access China’s innovation progress and challenges, also generates novel insights for scholars and public agencies to contribute to global innovation development, with a shared goal of achieving global sustainable development in the post-COVID-19 pandemic world.
... Reasons behind the innovation performance gap include executives' previous misunderstanding of innovation and lack of appreciation toward corporate strategies and R&D systems or the absence of a constructive culture to attract talents and motivate innovation (Chen and Yin, 2019a). Moreover, innovation has been considered as a one-way, successive, and gradual linear process. ...
... From an ecological perspective, innovation management no longer only involves coordination across single factors (Leviäkangas et al., 2018;Chen and Yin, 2019a). Players cohabiting a holistic ecosystem should view innovation from holistic, strategic, and global perspectives. ...
To obtain a sustainable competitive advantage and achieve global innovation leadership, firms in China and other emerging economies must develop strong indigenous innovation capabilities through the coevolution of strategy, organization, resources, and culture. Drawing on current innovation management theories and practices, this study proposes four systematic paths for improving firm innovation systems (FISs), namely, the R&D-based internal collaborative FIS, the strategic vision-driven FIS, the open and user-driven FIS, and the holistic ecosystem-driven FIS. This study contributes to the systematic approach for enhancing corporate indigenous innovation capability based on FISs. Moreover, this study provides theoretical and practical insights for China as well as other developing countries to cultivate world-class enterprises and build an innovative nation.
... More specifically, innovation is a social interactive learning process that full of risks (Blackmore, 2012;Chen and Yin, 2019;Schumpeter, 1934). Arrow (1972) argues that even though the research by corporations could reduce risk of innovation, the perfect competitive market may fail to achieve optimal resource allocation and profit from innovation. ...
A world with large disparities in development between rural and urban areas could never achieve sustainable development goals (SDGs). Issues related to agriculture, rural areas, and farmers are fundamental to the stability and people's welfare of China as well as other developing countries. Despite the growing demand and national initiative for rural revitalization, rural innovation has received little attention in the innovation literature. Drawing from the new growth theory, institutional theory and innovation system theory, this paper proposes the rural innovation system, which is a complex socioeconomic network that aims to revitalize the countryside and achieve balanced and sustainable development. This paper compares the rural and urban innovation system, introduces a theoretical structural model of the rural innovation system, including a) technology innovation, b) institutional and management innovation, and c) community-based network and intermediary platform innovation. Then it outlines the future challenges in fostering a strong rural innovation system. The rural innovation system proposed makes direct contributions to the literature of rural studies, innovation system, and public policy, and offers both China and the world a new perspective for realizing rural revitalization, anti-poverty and global sustainable development.
... More specifically, innovation is a social interactive learning process that full of risks (Blackmore, 2012;Chen and Yin, 2019;Schumpeter, 1934). Arrow (1972) argues that even though the research by corporations could reduce risk of innovation, the perfect competitive market may fail to achieve optimal resource allocation and profit from innovation. ...
本文着眼于创新发展的最新趋势和联合国全球可持续发展目标，立足于乡村振兴战略，针对目前创新领域对乡村创新关注不足的问题，首次提出乡村创新系统的概念。乡村创新系统是围绕乡村振兴与可持续发展主题，与创新相关的主体要素和非主体要素、地理要素和时空要素以及协调各要素之间关系的制度、政策和文化在创新过程中相互依存、相互作用而形成的社会经济系统。本文对比了乡村创新系统和城市创新系统的异同，提出乡村创新系统建设的科技创新、制度创新和网络组织建设“三位一体”驱动乡村振兴的机制，简述了乡村创新系统建设的理论与实践挑战，通过总结乡村创新系统促进乡村振兴的实践经验与典型案例，对国家和区域创新系统建设有重大的理论贡献，同时对落实创新驱动发展战略和精准扶贫方略，完善国家创新与扶贫政策，实现乡村振兴和可持续发展具有重要的实践价值。
The Oxford Handbook of China Innovation provides a contemporary and authoritative view of the role of innovation in China’s extraordinary emergence. The Handbook consists of chapters written by over sixty experts from universities and research institutions worldwide, who describe and analyze this phenomenon with criticism, discussion of policy issues, and views about further development. It focuses on the microeconomic factors in China’s growth, of which the critical force has been the steady drive for innovation. It identifies the many factors instrumental in the development of innovation and evaluates those that are specific to China’s context, and those applicable to other nations. The scope of topics is comprehensive, covering China's development policies, the place of innovation in national priorities, the components of the national innovation system, and the resources required for their effective deployment. These include the institutions and policies that provide incentives and support to technological development, including people, financial mechanisms, private ownership, rule of law, and culture. The issue of foreign influence is also addressed, including the evolution of policy toward inward foreign direct investment and knowledge transfer and China’s goals for outward foreign direct investment. The chapters include discussion of the capabilities and strategies of world-class Chinese innovators, together with emerging issues such as environmental remediation, green energy, digital innovation, open innovation, mass innovation, and China’s future science and technology policy. As China emerges as a contender for global leadership in many fields, this Handbook provides a foundation for informed conjecture regarding the challenges ahead.
The Oxford Handbook of China Innovation provides a contemporary and authoritative view of the role of innovation in China’s extraordinary emergence. The Handbook consists of chapters written by over sixty experts from universities and research institutions worldwide, who describe and analyze this phenomenon with criticism, discussion of policy issues, and views about further development. It focuses on the microeconomic factors in China’s growth, of which the critical force has been the steady drive for innovation. It identifies the many factors instrumental in the development of innovation and evaluates those that are specific to China’s context, and those applicable to other nations. The scope of topics is comprehensive, covering China's development policies, the place of innovation in national priorities, the components of the national innovation system, and the resources required for their effective deployment. These include the institutions and policies that provide incentives and support to technological development, including people, financial mechanisms, private ownership, rule of law, and culture. The issue of foreign influence is also addressed, including the evolution of policy toward inward foreign direct investment and knowledge transfer and China’s goals for outward foreign direct investment. The chapters include discussion of the capabilities and strategies of world-class Chinese innovators, together with emerging issues such as environmental remediation, green energy, digital innovation, open innovation, mass innovation, and China’s future science and technology policy. As China emerges as a contender for global leadership in many fields, this Handbook provides a foundation for informed conjecture regarding the challenges ahead.
Innovation has proved to be a credible source for business development for various organisations, many organisations rely on their ability to innovate to produce impactful and disruptive products and services. Organisations are increasingly focusing on employing candidates or graduates with the ability to be innovative and improve business development. Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) hold the responsibility to produce graduates with the capability to produce innovation and adapt to the innovative cultures and structures created by organisations. This aim of this paper is to determine the most prized innovation features of a business environment suitable for business development, this is to aid HEIs to be informed of the curriculum relevant to produce graduates capable of innovation and business development. The quantitative approach aspect of this research paper enabled the researcher to collect data using an online survey questionnaire from 69 innovation experts from the South African Business Innovation Community (Innovation Summit), and the Innovation, Sustainability and Visionary Leadership Group. The quantitative data was then analysed through inferential statistical analysis. Based on the findings from this research paper, business leadership is deemed the most prized feature of an innovative environment, along with explorative culture and brand identity. Findings from the commercialisation units further support the above findings, as they indicated that most graduates and young entrepreneurs lack leadership skills. In conclusion, entrepreneurial Higher Education Institutions should align their curriculum to industry needs, through understanding the various activities that graduates are expected to engage with in industry to contribute to business innovation and business development.
The association between entrepreneurship and innovation is strong because entrepreneurship requires innovation to be competitive in the market. Entrepreneurship is a way of thinking, acting, and living that creates value for others by providing them with opportunities to pursue their interests, and innovation is about improvement. It is the act of introducing new ideas, goods, or methods. Entrepreneurship and innovation are two entangled concepts that go hand in hand. The association between entrepreneurship and innovation is so strong that it has been said that entrepreneurs are responsible for driving innovation in society. Different studies have shown the significance of innovation in entrepreneurship. Through a literature review, this paper aims to locate what type of innovation and intensity can occur throughout the process of entrepreneurship. Differences in the concept of innovation are categorized into two orientations: nature and level of innovation. Moreover, the entrepreneurship process has been reconsidered, and based on the level and nature of innovation and detailed features of each stage, the possibility of innovation occurrence was defined.
