Figure 3 - uploaded by Gökhan Genç
Content may be subject to copyright.
Source publication
This study aims to explore whether teachers‟ reported practices of teaching conversation strategies show any difference from students‟ perceptions on teaching these strategies in in-class activities. The study also investigates the extent to which explicit conversation strategy teaching affects the use of the strategies in oral proficiency exam con...
Similar publications
The research study employed an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design, and it was aimed at determining and analyzing the essential factors that motivate university students’ English learning within the Ecuadorian higher education system. The quantitative study results, drawn from a questionnaire administered to 109 EFL university teachers, wer...
Citations
... They have concluded that in order to have more valid tests, raters' knowledge of students' proficiency levels could be controlled. Another researcher has looked into how candidates cope with the problems they encounter during OPI with a specific analysis of conversation strategies in a higher education setting in Turkey (Genç, 2017). The results of his study favour teaching communication strategies in speaking classes, which contributes to the on-going debate on whether or not include communication strategies in speaking class syllabi. ...
In the last decade, there has been a growing body of research that investigates L2 oral proficiency assessment from a micro-analytic perspective paying close attention to the sequential unfolding of these interactions (Kasper & Ross, 2007; Okada, 2010; Galaczi, 2014; Nitta & Nakatsuhara, 2014). Despite the growing number of studies with a micro-analytic perspective on interaction using conversation analysis, more emphasis is needed on detailed analyses of interaction (Sandlund, Sundqvist & Nyroos, 2016). In an attempt to fill this research and practice gap, this study will describe how paired interaction in an oral proficiency assessment setting is carried out at a higher education setting in Turkey. Using conversation analysis, this study investigates the interactional resources that are co-constructed in paired test-talk to maintain progressivity and intersubjectivity when there is a halt in the interaction. Progressivity is preferred in interaction (Stivers & Robinson, 2006), and progressivity is a must in test-talk since test-takers can only be assessed if they speak. In addition to that, maintaining intersubjectivity or achieving shared understanding is a key element in determining interactional competence (Dings, 2007). Likewise, interactional resources are considered as basis for interactional competence (Young, 2011). To this end, this study aims to contribute to our understanding of learner-learner interaction in an assessment setting and bring implications for future practice with the help of the interactional resources that have been revealed in this research. The study draws upon transcriptions of 100 paired test interactions, each of which lasts approximately 4 minutes. The data was collected at a higher education setting in Ankara, Turkey. The interactions are examined line-by-line using conversation analysis. First, the indicators of interactional trouble are identified, and frequency distributions of indicators of interactional trouble are created to provide a better understanding on the interactional trouble indicators occurring in paired test-talk. Second, a variety of interactional resources that have emerged from this study are identified (transitions to a sub-topic following interactional troubles, formulations of understanding following interactional troubles and collaborative sequences following interactional troubles). The findings show that the deployment of the interactional resources revealed in this study help to maintain progressivity of test talk. The findings also suggest that more collaborative interactional resources help test-takers achieve intersubjectivity in a better way.
In the light of the findings, the study provides insights to the concept of interactional competence for future practices of teaching and testing IC. Instructors, curriculum developers, and test designers can benefit from the results of this study.
Keywords: Conversation analysis, oral proficiency assessment in a second language, paired oral assessment, paired-peer tests, progressivity in interaction, intersubjectivity
