Figure - available from: Journal of Sensors
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Comparison of pie charts of performance input and output parameters across the six divisions. (a) Number of employees. (b) Total costs. (c) Number of orders. (d) Number of customers.
Source publication
Performance evaluation is an important sand central part of the human resource management system and the process of assessing performance and documenting performance with uniform criteria. Based on the hypothesis of high-performance work systems and HRM effectiveness, this paper proposes a DEA model for evaluating the performance of HRM in enterpri...
Similar publications
Aim/purpose – In this paper, we explore the contribution of Human Resource Management Systems (HRMS) to innovation in SMEs. We consider two HRMS with different orientations: Commitment HRMS (focusing on long-term career development to increase employees’ creativity) and Collaboration HRMS (focusing on the use of external human capital to achieve in...
Citations
... This may be because such board members are more inclined to make decisions conducive to the sustainable development of society. As a strategic human resource, board members are crucial to the future development of the company [24]. ...
Given the increasingly serious ecological and environmental problems in China, research on enterprises’ low-carbon sustainable development behavior (LCSDB) has become a heated discussion. This is also because enterprises are a primary source of carbon emissions and environmental pollution. From the perspective of the board of directors’ capital (BODC), this study considers empirical evidence from 286 enterprises listed on the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges in China from 2008 to 2016 to examine the BODC’s impact on enterprises’ LCSDB and its mechanisms. A group test is conducted using the enterprise’s property, nature of rights, and region, among other factors, to investigate the heterogeneity of the impact of board capital on enterprises’ LCSDB and its regulatory role. The research indicates (1) an increase in BODC promotes enterprises’ LCSDB. (2) An awareness of social responsibility (AOSR) plays an intermediary role in the relationship between BODC and corporate LCSDB. (3) Media attention enhances the BODC’s role in promoting enterprises’ LCSDB. (4) Government regulatory factors promote the BODC’s positive impact on LCSDB. These findings significantly impact the effectiveness of decision-makers within the company, the governance mechanism to address climate change risks, and the possible connection between corporate governance reform and carbon-related policies.
