Context in source publication

Context 1
... e Herbarium of the University of Belgrade, as a special unit of the Institute of Botany and Botanical Garden “Jevremovac” of the Faculty of Biology, is one of the most signifi cant and the richest herbarium collections not only in Serbia but in the whole of SE Europe. Th e Herbarium was established in 1860 when a famous Serbian botanist Josif Pančić gave his collection (80 bunches of dried plants from Banat and Srem) to the “Great School” in Belgrade, currently University of Belgrade. Aft er Pančić, who established the Herbarium, Ž. Jurišić, Đ. Ilić, Đ. Ničić, S. Pelivanović, N. Košanin, Th . Soška, L. Adamović, V. Blečić, I. Rudski, P. Černjavski, B. Tatić, M.M. Janković, V. Stevanović, J. Blaženčić, M. Niketić and many other botanists from that time until today have contributed to its enrichment. During its 150 year-long history, the fate of the Herbarium University of Belgrade had at times been very uncertain, and in some periods completely unclear. Namely, it is known that shortly before Pančić’s death in 1888 this herbarium collection was stored in the Botanical Cabinet of the Great School in Belgrade. Th e collection was then under the care of Ž. Jurišić, Pančić’s student and follower. Ten years aft er Pančić’s death, herbarium bunches were transferred from Th e Great School to the Botanical Garden “Jevremovac”, where the Herbarium is housed today ( Fig. 1). J. Bornmuller (1887-1889) and O. Bierbach (1890-1903) also worked together with Jurišić on the maintenance and enrichment of the Herbarium. Between 1902 and 1906, the head of the Herbarium was professor L. Adamović. Th ere is some written evidence for this period of Herbarium management revealing that Adamović was charged with handing over herbarium specimens to Herbariums in Vienna, Pest, Berlin, and even to some private owners. When professor N. Košanin became the director of the Botanical Garden in 1906, the work on enrichment and maintenance of the herbarium collections started again. A new extension to the administration building was turned into the Herbarium rooms, equipped with adequate conditions for preserving the collections. Košanin had been travelling and collecting plant material intensively, restocking Pančić’s collection which was impoverished by the previous manager. Since 1914, Košanin and his companion T. Soška, a gardener of the Botanical Garden and a great fl oristic expert, collected rich plant material during their fi eld surveys, mainly from Macedonia. During the First World War, the Herbarium was shelled. At the order of the civil governor of Serbia in 1916 K. Maly, the curator of the Herbarium in Sarajevo, who as a sergeant at that time was in Belgrade, sent four collections each consisting of 500 to 1000 specimens of herbarized plants to the Institute of Botany and Botanical Garden of the University in Vienna, Natural History Museum in Budapest, Zemaljski muzej now National Museum in Sarajevo and Botanical Institute in Zagreb. Aft er the war, thanks to the intense engagement of professor Nedeljko Košanin and the Directorate of Spoils of the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes, collections from Vienna, Sarajevo and Zagreb were returned. In 1920, as revealed by available records which are kept on fi le at the Institute of Botany in Belgrade, professor R. Wettstein himself, the then director of the Institute of Botany of the University in Vienna, prepared and sent to Belgrade one series of plants that had reached Vienna from Belgrade during the war. In addition, to compensate for those specimens that could not be returned, professor Wettstein sent an additional collection consisting of 550 plants. According to data from the fi le, in 1919 K. Maly also sent a collection of 3390 plants to Belgrade. Among them there were 1241 plants that were transferred from Belgrade to Sarajevo during the war, as well as another 2149 plants that had been collected mainly from the western Balkans, beyond the territory of Serbia. Furthermore, according to the available information, professor V. Vouk, the then director of the Botanical Institute in Zagreb, returned to Belgrade most of the plants (about 600 specimens) that during the war had been transferred to Zagreb. Only the fate of herbarium material that had been transferred to Budapest has still not been clarifi ed. In correspondence between the Directorate of Spoils of the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes and the Natural History Museum in Budapest there is a document dated April 7th, 1920 in which T. Filarsky, the then director of the Botanical Department of the Natural History Museum in Budapest, admits that in 1916 he has received a collection of 987 species that had been sent from the Belgrade Botanical Garden. In the same letter Filarsky obligated that the Botanical Department of the Museum in Budapest would make an appropriate plant collection that he would return to Belgrade. At the end of that year, N. Košanin, in his report about the state and needs of the Botanical Garden and Institute of Belgrade University, which he sent to the minister of education on October 16th 1920, included a statement that herbarium collections that were transferred to Vienna and Sarajevo had been returned, and that he expects that those that were transferred to Zagreb and Budapest would soon be returned. Th e collection from Zagreb was returned, whereas no tracks about the collection from Budapest can be found. Furthermore, in his book “Th e Hundredth Anniversary of the Botanical Garden Jevremovac”, professor B. Tatić, a long-standing head of the Institute of Botany and Botanical Garden of Belgrade University, explicitly stated that only the herbarium collection from Budapest had not been returned (Tatić 1996). During the period from Košanin’s death (1934) to Soška’s (1948) the herbarium was completely uncared- for and neglected. Not only was no new material brought in, but no care was paid to the preservation of the collection. Th e situation changed in the 1970s following the appointment of V. Stevanović, who restarted handling, sorting, classifying, treating, and refi lling the existing herbarium collection. At his initiative, in 1991 S. Vukojičić was elected the new curator of the Herbarium. She has been taking care of the preservation of existing collections, as well as adding to them and exchanging herbarium material with related institutions in Europe and worldwide. Today, 150 years aft er its establishment, the Belgrade University Herbarium is registered under code BEOU in the world centre in New York (Holmgren et al. 1990) and contains over 180000 specimens of vascular plants, mosses and algae. Herbarium BEOU is organized into the following collections: Herbarium Pancicianum which, from historical, cultural and scientifi c points of view, is the most signifi cant collection of plants that was collected in the 19th century by Josif Pančić. Herbarium Generale , the richest plant collection gathered not only in the Balkan Peninsula, but throughout the whole world; most of the herbarium material derives from the 19th and the fi rst half of the 20th century. More recent collections (the second half of the 20th century until the present time): Specimens of some genera that have been the subject of almost continual taxonomic and chorologic studies since the mid 19th century are good indicators of more recent enrichment of the BEOU collection. Th us, using data from analyses of the collection of the genus Campanula L., which numbers 2130 specimens collected or exchanged in Serbia and other Balkan and European countries in the period from 1860 to 2010, and which integrates collections of Herbarium Pancicianum , Herbarium Generale and Collection of the Department of Plant Ecology and Geography , Gudelj (2007) established that more than 200 legators have participated in the formation of the Belgrade University Herbarium. Th e greatest number of exsiccates integrated in this collection were gathered by V. Stevanović, D. Lakušić, J. Pančić, S. Jovanović, N. Košanin, M. Niketić, Th . Soška, G. Tomović, I. Rudski, M. M. Janković, J. Hruby, S. Vukojičić, J. Petrović, L. Rajevski, G. Džukić, in the order indicated. Chronology of establishing the collection of genus Campanula in BEOU mostly parallels the historical development of fl oristic investigations in Serbia (Fig. 2). Th erefore, the whole period might be divided into three prosperous periods, distinguished by J. Pančić and collaborators (1870-1890), N. Košanin and Th . Soška (1920-1930) and V. Stevanović and his collaborators (1990-2010). Th ree additional periods of decline are clearly distinct. Th e fi rst relates to the period before the Balkan Wars and the First World War (1890-1910), the second to the period before the Second World War (1930-1940), and the third to the general decline in activities regarding work in the Herbarium aft er the II World War (1950-1970). In geographical respect, most of the collection (72%) is made up of plants gathered in the territory of Serbia (45%), Montenegro (18%) and Macedonia (9%). A considerable number of exemplars originate from Greece (3%), Croatia (3%) and Bulgaria (2%), and quite a number of specimens derive from Italy and Spain. Interestingly, 8% of plants in the collection do not have a precisely established geographical origin. Because of its botanical signifi cance, i.e. its complex, unsolved taxonomy in the Balkan Peninsula, which results from intra-specifi c variability, as well as insuffi ciently clarifi ed chorology, species of the genus Campanula have oft en been collected by botanists. Moreover, because of the attractiveness of this genus, its plants have been picked by collectors and amateurs. Accordingly, the number of exsiccates of this genus taxa is very high and generally illustrates the mode of formation of the whole collection of the Belgrade University ...

Citations

... Під час воєнної компанії французького імператора Наполеона І Бонапарта у вересні 1812 р. в пожежі Москви (нині РФ) дощенту згорів гербарій підприємців і меценатів Демидових. У перші дні І Світової війни у липні 1914 р. в ході артилеристського обстрілу Белграду (Сербія) серйозних пошкоджень зазнала будівля Гербарію Белградського університету (BEOU), з якої потому вдалось врятувати вцілілі гербарні матеріали [Vukojičić et al, 2011]. Під час ІІ Світової війни, бомбардування Берліну (ФРН) 1 -2 березня 1943 р. призвело до катастрофічних руйнувань і втрат Гербарію Ботанічного музею Берлін-Дахлем (В), який до війни нараховував понад 4 млн. ...
... In a publication he presented the bryophytes collected by Ignaz Dörfl er, who was a member of the demarcation commission in 1914 and travelled to the border area of Montenegro and Albania (Dragićević 2022 As a part of the Degen collection, the HNHM also holds few specimens collected by Oskar Bierbach (? -1910). He was a German botanist, who worked in the Jevremovac Botanical Garden in Belgrade between 1890 and 1903 (Vukojičić et al. 2011). From 1905, he worked as a scribe at the German Legation in Cetinje and at the same time as the gardener of the Montenegrin king, Nikola Petrović. ...
Article
184 specimens, collected by ten persons between 1890–1975 from Montenegro, were found in the Bryophyte Collection of the Hungarian Natural History Museum. Most of the specimens (40%) were collected near Herceg Novi in Boka Kotorska Bay. Another significant part of the specimens (35%) was collected in Kotor or in the surrounding of the town. 18% of the specimens derives from the Orjen Mts. The others are sporadic records from various parts of Montenegro. 80% of the specimens were unpublished. Most of the species found are common, widespread members of the Montenegrin flora, but some rare elements were also found. The Mediterranean, subMediterranean liverworts (Cephaloziella turneri, Myriocoleopsis minutissima, Scapania compacta and Southbya tophacea) from the surroundings of Herceg Novi that are rare in Montenegro are the most important from the point of view of nature conservation.
... Regarding macroalgae collections in Serbia, in the wet collection and the herbarium of the University of Belgrade Herbarium (BEOU) until 2011 [127], there were in total 2348 labelled and named specimens of charophytes (in the wet collection 2287, and in herbarium sheets 61), originating mainly from the Balkans, but also from all over the world. This rich wet collection was constituted thanks to the devoted and systematic studies of charophytes from the 1970s onwards by prof. ...
... The herbarium collection originates mainly from a much earlier period, and unfortunately, it was ruined and currently only what was left of it -61 specimens are preserved in BEOU. The Pančić's collection of charophytes in Serbia-the first one, was completely lost as supposed by Vukojičić et al. [127] in turbulent historical events in Serbia in the twentieth century. Professor Košanin, who continued charophyte studies in Serbia after Pančić, and published Pančić's records later at the beginning of XX century [115,128], noted that Pančić's collection was well preserved at the time. ...
Chapter
The shallow aquatic ecosystems of Serbia are treasuries of algal biodiversity, unfairly neglected in both scientific studies and legislation concerning species and habitat protection. Underestimating the algal diversity in these ecosystems derives primarily from poor knowledge and/or interest in algal taxonomy and phylogeny, as well as ignorance of their role in the maintenance of ecosystem equilibrium and in the bioindication of water quality. The issue of conserving algae (i.e. their habitats) is challenging due to many aspects, including the problematic biogeography concept (particularly for microalgae), low taxonomic resolution of available data, and undersampling. Still, progress in the conservation of algae is noticeable worldwide. Although macroalgae are mainly recognized as endangered and protected species, they are still overlooked in conservation management in Serbia. Simultaneously, the data on microalgal diversity in shallow and small water bodies are scarce and sporadic. There are no long term monitoring programs towards recognizing the remarkable algal diversity characteristic for these habitats. This chapter offers an overview of the biodiversity of algae—both microscopic and macroscopic in shallow and small water bodies of Serbia, along with the frame and guidelines for protecting algae and their habitats.
... Panč." at the Botanical Institute of the University of Belgrade, adding that they failed to contact the staff. The collection in Belgrade (BEOU) was neglected at the time and until 1991 but it does in fact hold the most complete sets of gatherings by Pančić in the separate collection Herbarium Pancicianum comprising of 15,377 sheets, of which 1,014 were collected by Pančić in Montenegro as reported by Vukojičić et al. (2011). In the meantime, 71 additional sheets were discovered in the Herbarium Generale of BEOU. ...
... Some of the material was later returned from Vienna, Sarajevo, and Zagreb, but some of it was lost. Consequently, Wettstein sent an additional collection of 550 sheets from Vienna and Maly sent an additional 2149 sheets from Sarajevo to compensate for the loss (Vukojičić et al. 2011). The material collected by Pančić may be stored somewhere and overlooked because Pančić did not always put his name on the label, it is not unusual for date and locality to be missing and some labels were partly written in Cyrillic, which curators in many European institutions may have found unreadable (S. ...
Article
We provide information on the typification of the names described by Josif Pančić in his Elenchus plantarum vascularum quas aestate a. 1873 in Crna Gora, published in 1875. Also, we present a brief description of Pančić’s field trip to Montenegro emphasizing when and where the gatherings of the material used for describing taxa new to science were made. Nomenclatural notes for all 13 validly published names are given. Lectotypes for 10 validly published names are proposed: Astragalus spruneri var. glabrescens, Campanula glomerata var. macrodon, Carduus ramosissimus, Geranium oreades, Heliosperma macranthum, Koeleria grandiflora var. subaristata, Orobanche cruenta var. adusta, Sonchus pallescens, Valeriana bertiscea and Verbascum leptocladum. Previous typifications of the three names described in Elenchus are summarized. Also, notes for the three names not validly published are given.
... One of the most important and largest herbarium collections in Southeastern Europe is located at the Institute of Botany and Botanical garden "Jevremovac" of the Faculty of Biology, University of Belgrade. It was founded almost 160 years ago, in 1860, when the famous Serbian botanist Josif Pančić gave his collection of pressed plants to the Great School, cur-rent University of Belgrade (Vukojičić et al., 2011). At that time, the collection numbered 20.000 specimens of 6.000 different species that he was gathering during his field trips, but also as an exchange with the European herbaria such as Germany, France, Italy, Spain and Russia. ...
... A far greater collection of bryophytes has been kept at the BEOU Herbarium, which has been intensively increasing over the last twenty years. It is estimated to have over 18.000 specimens (Vukojičić at al., 2011) All original data on taxa, locality, collector, date, locality, habitat and ecology and identifier, were entered into excel spreadsheet. Specimens have been identified to at least genus level, although the majority was identified to a species or lower level. ...
Article
Full-text available
Considering recent progress of bryology in Serbia digitisation of bryophyte collection within BEOU (Bryo BEOU) was initiated. It is the most important and the largest collection of the bryophytes in the country, and represent a significant basis for all further research and analysis of bryophyte flora of Serbia. This collection also keeps relevant material from neighbouring countries that are considered poorly investigated (e.g. N. Macedo-nia, Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina). Here an overview of the specimens kept in the collection, data-based up to 2019, is given. However, work on the organisation and systematisation of this growing collection is ongoing.
... The second important collection is the bryophyte collection within the herbarium of the University of Belgrade (BEOU). It was established in the early 1990s (Vukojičić et al. 2011). The collection is estimated to have over 18000 bryophyte specimens. ...
Article
Full-text available
Bryophyte flora research in Serbia was rather sporadic until the end of the 19th century, when a group of mostly high-school teachers started researching bryophytes. This was the first fruitful period of exploration, with many new country records. Thereafter, not many researchers investigated bryophytes in Serbia, and the majority of chorological data came from vegetation, ecological, or palaeobotanical studies. This lasted until the 1990s, when a revival of bryophyte investigation occurred, bringing with it many floristic studies and new species records for the country. At the present time, Serbia is considered to be rich in bryophyte diversity, with as many as 797 species. However, further study and a critical approach to the bryophyte flora of Serbia are needed.
... A. liliifolia is scattered across Europe and forms isolated populations in Germany (Meusel and Jäger, 1992;Castroviejo et al., 2010), Austria, Switzerland (Moser, 1999), Italy, Czechia (Martinovský, 1967;Kovanda, 2000), Poland (Witkowski et al., 2003;Korzeniak and Nobis, 2004;Ciosek, 2006;Kapler et al., 2015), Slovakia (Goliášová and Šípošová, 2008), Hungary Vojtkó, 2012, 2013;Vojtkó, 2013), Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, Serbia (Vladimirov et al., 2009;Vukojičić et al., 2011), Romania (Jones et al., 2010;Indreica, 2011), and Slovenia (Babij, 2004;Acetto, 2007). In Belarus, the species was thought to be extinct (Kozlovskaja, 1978), but one population at Sporowski Zakaznik was restored with plants multiplied in vitro and cultivated in the Minsk Botanical Garden of the Belarussian Academy of Sciences (Wiliams and Gotin, 2012). ...
Article
Full-text available
This study deals with populations of the European-South-Siberian geoelement Adenophora liliifolia (L.) A. DC. in the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary, Romania, and Poland, where this species has its European periphery distribution. We studied the population size, genetic variability, site conditions, and vegetation units in which A. liliifolia grows. Recent and historical localities of A. liliifolia were ranked into six vegetation units of both forest and non-forest character. A phytosociological survey showed differences in the species composition among localities. Only a weak pattern of population genetic structure was observed (22% at the interpopulation level, AMOVA analysis), with moderate values for gene diversity (Hj = 0.141) and polymorphism (P = 27.6%). Neighbor-joining and Bayesian clusterings suggest a similar genetic background for most of the populations from Slovakia, the Czech Republic, and Poland, contrary to the populations from Hungary, Romania, as well as two populations from Central and South Slovakia. This might be explained by a relatively recent fragmentation of the A. liliifolia populations in Central Europe. Nevertheless, it seems that several populations in Romania, South Hungary, and Slovakia were isolated for a longer period of time and their genetic differentiation is more evident.
... Most of the plants collected by Pančić that were described by Visiani or jointly with Visiani are held in the Herbarium of Padova (PAD) and in the Herbarium of the University of Belgrade (BeoU), in the special collection Herbarium Pancicianum (Vukojičić et al. 2011). The following herbaria were also consulted: BoLo, BP, BUnS, CL, G, GoeT, HAL, Je, K, nAP, P, PrC, UPS, W, and WU (abbreviations follow Thiers 2015). ...
Article
Full-text available
We provide information on the typification of the names of one genus (Lactucopsis), two sections (L. sect. Mulgediopsis, L. sect. Prenanthopsis), two unranked subgeneric names (Hieracium [unranked] Chlorocarpa, H. [unranked] Melanocarpa Sch), ten species (Dianthus moesiacus, Eryngium palmatum, Haplophyllum boissierianum, Hieracium schultzianum, Lactucopsis aurea, Lactucopsis brevirostris, Lactucopsis mulgedioides, Mulgedium sonchifolium, Picridium macrophyllum, Stachys anisochila), and one form (Gypsophila spergulifolia f. serbica) validly published in Roberto de Visiani and Josif Pančić's work Plantae Serbicae Rariores aut Novae— Decas III, published in 1870, and one variety (Knautia macedonica var. lyrophylla) published in Verzeichnis der in Serbien wildwachsenden Phanerogamen (1856). Additional nomenclatural notes deal with three other species, five new combinations, seven invalid names and one invalid combination that were also discussed or published in Visiani & Pančić (1870). Seven nomenclatural types for eight validly published taxa are designated here.
... most of the plants collected by Pančić that were described by visiani or jointly with visiani are held in the herbarium of Padova (PAd), mainly in the special collection Herbarium Dalmaticum, and in the herbarium of the university of Belgrade (Beou) in the special collection Herbarium Pancicianum (vukojičić et al. 2011). the following herbaria were also consulted: BASSA, Bolo, G, HAl, PrC and W (abbreviations follow thiers 2014). ...
Article
Full-text available
Roberto de Visiani (1800–1878) was a Dalmatian botanist of Italian ancestry. During the 1850s he started a long lasting collaboration with a Serbian professor - botanist Josif Pancic (1814–1888), who worked in Belgrade. During this period, from 1858 to 1871, they described thirty-five new species and one new variety, in four articles (Visiani 1860, Visiani & Pancic 1862, Visiani & Pancic 1865, Visiani & Pancic 1870). Many of their names are still in general use or are basionyms of the names in use (Euro+Med 2014), but, with few exceptions, they have not yet been typified.
... Although he searched for the original material in numerous herbaria, he did not find all the original exsiccates. At that time, there was no curator in the herbarium BEOU of Belgrade (Vukojičić et al. 2011), and the collection was not reported in the Index Herbariorum (Thiers 2013, continuously updated). Many scientists thought this collection was completely destroyed during World War II, including Erben who designated neotypes for several Viola species, not being aware that the original material for some of them still exists in BEOU. ...
Article
Full-text available
This paper provides information on the typification of the three names in Viola Sect. Melanium: Viola dukadjinica, V. grisebachiana and V. orbelica. All the specimens designated as lectotypes here are deposited in BEOU.