Figure 1 - uploaded by Galin Tihanov
Content may be subject to copyright.
Change of harvester idle time for unloading the hopper (T1), depending on the time from activating the alarm to the start of the vehicle (t 1 ) and the time from the start of the vehicle to its arrival under the unloading auger of the grain harvester (t 2 ) in different harvesters On Figure 2 the lines of the same response T1= f(t 1 , t 2 ) = const are graphically shown for the mathematical model obtained for the harvester idle time for unloading the hopper -T1.

Change of harvester idle time for unloading the hopper (T1), depending on the time from activating the alarm to the start of the vehicle (t 1 ) and the time from the start of the vehicle to its arrival under the unloading auger of the grain harvester (t 2 ) in different harvesters On Figure 2 the lines of the same response T1= f(t 1 , t 2 ) = const are graphically shown for the mathematical model obtained for the harvester idle time for unloading the hopper -T1.

Source publication
Article
Full-text available
The article studied the effect of transport vehicles on the grain harvester idle time during wheat, barley and rapeseed harvesting in 6 agricultural farms. In each of the farms one grain harvester and the established harvesting organization were studied without changing the unloading mode and the specific activities performed by the harvester opera...

Contexts in source publication

Context 1
... graphical representation of the regression model for T1 (harvester idle time for unloading the hopper) was made by taking into account the effect of the times t 1 (time from activation of the harvester alarm to the start of the vehicle) and t 2 (time from the start of the vehicle until it arrives under the harvester unloading auger). Figure 1 presents graphically the response surface for Т1= f(t 1 , t 2 ). On Figure 1 it can be seen that the change in the harvester idle time for unloading the hopper (T1) depends on the vehicle position in the field (t 1 ) and the time for moving them to the unloading auger of the grain harvester (t 2 ). ...
Context 2
... 1 presents graphically the response surface for Т1= f(t 1 , t 2 ). On Figure 1 it can be seen that the change in the harvester idle time for unloading the hopper (T1) depends on the vehicle position in the field (t 1 ) and the time for moving them to the unloading auger of the grain harvester (t 2 ). The duration of this operation can be minimized by the proper operation of harvester operators and vehicle drivers and the correct setting of the sensor for the first level of hopper filling. ...