Calendar/project implementation schedule over 18 months (source: authors).

Calendar/project implementation schedule over 18 months (source: authors).

Source publication
Article
Full-text available
Pacific regional organisations focusing on climate change have overlapping adaptation-related mandates. With the growing importance of regional organisations in supplying financial and technical resources for climate adaptation in small island developing states, it is important to understand how well these supranational organisations work together...

Context in source publication

Context 1
... months have been allowed for the initial engagement with SPC and SPREP, and another three months for analysing and interpreting the data collected. The tasks to be completed are shown in Figure 4. Estimated start and completion dates are 1 January 2022 and 30 June 2023, respectively. ...

Similar publications

Conference Paper
Full-text available
Purpose-The present paper investigates performance improvement in organizations, from the perspective of generalizability. The objective is to examine generic aspects of organizational performance in different contexts. Abiding by a confirmatory approach, the paper endeavoured to bring change to the reality of two organizations, in order to test as...

Citations

... The increased involvement of diverse organizations in adaptation has called for closer analysis of the role of inter-organizational networks at various scales (global, national, regional, etc.) (Barton, Krellenberg, & Harris, 2015;Bisri, 2017;Braunschweiger & Pütz, 2021). Research has shown that the capacity and willingness to enact adaptation varies between organizations (Berkhout, 2012); thus, the knowledge of organizational networks provides a more cohesive understanding of how organizations can coordinate for adaptation (Gilfillan, Robinson, & Barrowman, 2020). Further, enhancing inter-organizational coordination has shown to be important for resource sharing and coordination (Barton, Krellenberg, & Harris, 2015;Gilfillan, Robinson, & Barrowman, 2020) despite the significant challenges in coordinating organizations for climate change adaptation (Hanssen, Mydske, & Dahle, 2013). ...
... Research has shown that the capacity and willingness to enact adaptation varies between organizations (Berkhout, 2012); thus, the knowledge of organizational networks provides a more cohesive understanding of how organizations can coordinate for adaptation (Gilfillan, Robinson, & Barrowman, 2020). Further, enhancing inter-organizational coordination has shown to be important for resource sharing and coordination (Barton, Krellenberg, & Harris, 2015;Gilfillan, Robinson, & Barrowman, 2020) despite the significant challenges in coordinating organizations for climate change adaptation (Hanssen, Mydske, & Dahle, 2013). ...
Article
Climate change impacts on housing are an essential concern for Alaska Native communities. Adaptation literature has largely ignored the role of inter-organizational coordination networks in supporting housing adaptation. To address this gap, we surveyed 26 organizations and 36 participants from organizations working regionally in rural Alaska on housing service, construction, and engineering projects. We employ social network analysis (SNA), including Logistic Regression Quadratic Assignment Procedure (LRQAP), to explore the influence of network centrality on an organization's ability to enact housing adaptation. Results indicate that when two organizations have similarities in their network centrality, or how connected an organization was in the network, the less likely they are to have similar, positive views in their ability to enact housing adaptation. With a limited capacity to prepare for climate change impacts and integrate adaptation into existing programs, it is important for organizations and governments to mobilize the entirety of inter-organizational coordination networks.
... Inter-organizational collaboration among disaster management organizations is essential in disaster response and recovery projects, which are characterized by uncertainty and time pressure. In this regard, concept of climate change in Alaska and inter-organizational coordination methodologically fit the network theory and analysis.2.2.1 Inter-Organizational Frequency of Interaction, Sharing Resources, and Social NetworkCharacteristicsThe increasing demand for financial and technical resources for adaptation has shown that enhancing inter-organizational coordination can facilitate resource sharing and coordination across scales and sectors(Gilfillan et al., 2020;Barton et al., 2015). Literature suggests that understanding inter-organizational coordination is valuable, but coordinating organizations for climate change adaptation is still challenging(Hanssen et al., 2012). ...
... Literature suggests that understanding inter-organizational coordination is valuable, but coordinating organizations for climate change adaptation is still challenging(Hanssen et al., 2012). Research, in particular, reveals how individuals interact with one another, how organizational structures and procedures affect communications, and the solution of common issues(Gilfillan et al., 2020). Housing issues require adequate resources for each organization, such as funding that addresses concerns that extend beyond a project`s goals. ...
Thesis
Full-text available
The effects of climate change are increasingly threatening the livelihoods, economies, and cultural identities of Indigenous communities in Alaska, resulting in a disruption of their social, physical, and ecological systems that are impairing their communities' sustainability. A major concern of Alaska Native communities is the effects of climate change exacerbate their pre-existing housing issues. Further, a wide range of organizations participates in addressing housing issues, including governmental, regional, private, tribal, and non-profit organizations. Throughout the literature, a growing focus has been placed on inter-organizational coordination networks as a means of supporting climate-vulnerable communities. Despite this growing knowledge, it has been found that there has been little focus on inter-organizational coordination when it comes to the mitigation of climate change in the development of housing. Furthermore, there is a lack of knowledge about the way inter-organizational coordination influences the level of engagement in Indigenous communities. To address this gap, we surveyed 26 organizations and 36 participants that are active in addressing housing issues in rural Alaska. In this study, we used social network analysis (SNA), including Logistic Regression Quadratic Assignment Procedure (LRQAP), in order to study the influence of inter-organizational activities on housing concerns within an organization as well as the impact of their network centrality on community engagement levels. The results of the social network analysis identified the prominent players in the inter-organizational networks, particularly, Organization V, receiving the most shared resources from the other organizations, and Organizations D and Y, providing the most shared resources to the other organizations. For organizations that shared financial resources, the odds of addressing housing issues through housing design concern increased by 38% (p*0.1). Additionally, organizations that shared knowledge and information increased their chances of addressing climate change issues through housing design concerns by 45% (p*0.1). Sharing resources and knowledge increased the chances of adapting to climate change through sociocultural concerns by 51% (p*0.1).
... There are also regional variations that are worth noting: AIMS SIDS are strongest in 'stakeholder engagement and knowledge management'; Caribbean SIDS in 'observation and assessment of climate variables'; and Pacific SIDS in 'planning', 'implementation', and 'monitoring/evaluation' (Robinson, 2020a). Much of this can be credited to the strength of regional programming or lack thereof as it is well established in the literature that SIDS pool resources at the regional level to minimize the challenges associated with capacity constraints (see Gilfillan et al., 2020;Kelman, 2016;Robinson & Gilfillan, 2017;Robinson et al., 2022). ...
Article
Full-text available
Small island developing states (SIDS) are recognized as being among the most vulnerable countries to climate change—many are highly exposed and sensitive to, inter alia, sea-level rise and increased intensity storms, yet often lack the human and financial resources needed for successful and/or effective adaptation. The international community has responded to SIDS’ precarious situation, in part, by establishing a suite of multilateral funding mechanisms to help finance costly adaptation projects and programs. However, to date, there has been a mismatch between the level of international climate finance mobilized and the scale of adaptation that is needed in SIDS. This paper reviews the relevant academic and policy literatures to provide a system-wide diagnosis of the institutional and conceptual problems plaguing adaptation-specific multilateral climate funds, which are often addressed in isolation. We show that, following the establishment of the Global Environment Facility, many multilateral climate funds have been rife with administrative issues, creating barriers to access for particularly vulnerable countries. The funding that SIDS do receive is often insufficient to meet the costs of adaptation, and funding allocations are demonstrably skewed amongst SIDS and amongst types of adaptation projects and programs funded. In concluding, we propose reorienting multilateral adaptation finance towards resilience as a means of improving the governance of international adaptation finance and increasing access for SIDS and other particularly vulnerable countries.
... Diagnosing indicator performance by actors changes the engagement from a purely rational, top-down approach decided by experts and managers to a broader view allowing 'multiple ways of knowing' (Barrett et al. 2017;Delfau 2018) and co-learning (Gilfillan et al. 2020). Colearning changes the dialogue and power dynamics of basin actors in favour of a more egalitarian way in which interaction is no longer uniquely guided by preconceived ideas of users, providers, regulators and managers, but where social capacity aims for transformative sustainability learning (Barrett et al. 2017) and adaptive governance (Folke et al. 2005), requiring longer-term institutional reform (Sharma-Wallace et al. 2018). ...
Article
Full-text available
Successful river basin governance is challenged by actor engagement in the various stages of planning and management. A governance approach for determining priorities for actors for sustainable management was developed, based on a river basin diagnostic framework consisting of four social-institutional and four biophysical indicators. It was applied in river basins in Australia, Brazil, China and France. Actors diagnosed current and target capacity for these indicators, and estimated synergistic influences of interacting indicators. The results reveal different priorities and transformative pathways to achieve basin plan outcomes, specific to each basin and actor groups. Priorities include biodiversity for the Murray-Darling, local water management needs for the São Francisco and Yellow rivers, and improved decision-making for the Adour-Garonne. This novel approach challenges entrenched views about key issues and actor engagement roles in co-implementation of the basin plan under existing prevailing governance models, with implications for engagement and international collaboration on basin governance.