FigUrE 2 - uploaded by Mohammad R Hasan
Content may be subject to copyright.
Source publication
This technical paper presents a global review on the use of aquatic macrophytes as feed for farmed fish, with particular reference to their current and potential use by small-scale farmers. The review is organized under four major divisions of aquatic macrophytes: algae, floating macrophytes, submerged macrophytes and emergent macrophytes. Under fl...
Similar publications
This technical paper presents a global review on the use of aquatic macrophytes as feed for farmed fish, with particular reference to their current and potential use by small-scale farmers. The review is organized under four major divisions of aquatic macrophytes: algae, floating macrophytes, submerged macrophytes and emergent macrophytes. Under fl...
Citations
... Commercial production of Lemnaceae takes place in tropical climates, and dehydrated and de-oiled biomass of the Lemna plant, called Lemna meal, may be included in poultry and fish diets (Haustein et al., 1994; Bairagi et al., 2002). Lemna meal contains 35 to 45% CP and 7 to 10% crude fiber (Olorunfemi et al., 2006; Hasan and Chakrabarti, 2009). A new technology developed by Parabel Inc. (Melbourne , FL) allows for extraction of CP and AA from lemna, which results in production of a lemna protein concentrate (LPC) that contains approximately 68% CP. ...
Lemna protein concentrate (LPC; 68.0% CP) is produced by extracting protein from de-oiled and dehydrated biomaterials from plants of the Lemnaceae family and may be used as a protein source for animals. There are, however, no published data on the nutritional value of LPC fed to pigs. Three experiments were, therefore, conducted to determine the concentration of ME, the standardized total tract digestibility (STTD) of P, and the standardized ileal digestibility (SID) of AA in LPC and to compare these values to values for fish meal and soybean meal (SBM). Experiment 1 was conducted to determine the ME of LPC, fish meal, SBM, and corn. Thirty-two barrows (initial BW: 16.8 ± 2.8 kg) were placed in metabolism cages and allotted to a randomized complete block design with 4 diets and 8 replicate pigs per diet. A corn-based diet and 3 diets that contained corn and LPC, fish meal, or SBM were formulated. Feces and urine were collected for 5 d after a 5-d adaptation period, and all samples were analyzed for GE. Results indicated that the concentration of ME was not different among corn, fish meal, and SBM (3,855, 3,904, and 4,184 kcal/kg DM, respectively), but there was a tendency (P = 0.08) for a reduced ME in LPC (3,804 kcal/kg DM) compared with SBM. In Exp. 2, 24 barrows (initial BW: 12.5 ± 2.5 kg) were allotted to a randomized complete block design with 3 diets and 8 replicate pigs per diet and used to determine the STTD of P in LPC, fish meal, and SBM. Three diets that each contained 1 of the 3 test ingredients as the sole source of P were formulated. Pigs were placed in metabolism cages, and feces were collected for 5 d after a 5-d adaptation period. The STTD of P in LPC (72.8%) was not different from the STTD of P in fish meal (65.6%), but tended (P = 0.07) to be greater than in SBM (62.8%). The SID of AA in LPC, SBM, and fish meal was determined in Exp. 3. Eight barrows (initial BW: 21.4 ± 4.0 kg) were equipped with a T-cannula in the distal ileum and randomly allotted to a replicated 4 × 4 Latin square design. A N-free diet and 3 cornstarch-based diets in which SBM, SBM and LPC or SBM and fish meal were the only sources of AA were formulated. The SID of most indispensable AA was greater (P < 0.05) in fish meal than in LPC, but the overall SID of AA was not different between fish meal and LPC. In conclusion, the ME and the STTD of P are not different between LPC and fish meal, but there is a tendency for greater ME in SBM than in LPC, whereas the STTD of P tends to be greater in LPC than in SBM. The SID of the most indispensable AA is greater in fish meal than in LPC.
The aim of this study was to determine the possibility of using duckweed in sustainable livestock production and aquaculture. Duckweed is a small plant which grows in water and exploited in biotechnology, dietetics, phytotherapy, and ecotoxicology. It is also used for biological wastewater treatment, and for biogas and ethanol production. This study provides the characteristics of duckweed and presents results indicating its applicability in livestock feeding. Duckweed is a rich source of proteins and amino acids, and contains many macro- and micronutrients as well as vitamins and carotenoids. Unfortunately, it accumulate considerable amounts of toxic metals and compounds from the aquatic environment, which may limit its use as a feed ingredient. Fresh or dried duckweed is willingly consumed by animals (poultry – laying hens, broiler chickens, ducks; cows, sheep, goats, swine, fish) and is a valuable protein source to them. It has been scientifically demonstrated that its use in moderate amounts or as a partial replacement of other protein feed materials, including soybean meal, has a beneficial effect on the productivity, fattening, and slaughter performance of livestock and poultry as well as on the quality of their meat and eggs. Research addressing duckweed use as a feed ingredient should focus on developing various growth media technologies, including the use of slurry digestate, to obtain high biomass yields. Another research direction should be to determine risks in the production chain (collection, processing), which limit its use in monogastric and ruminant diets.
Plant protein sources have been identified to have the greatest potential to replace fish meal protein in aquafeeds. However, plant ingredients contain significant quantities of carbohydrates, and the ability of fish to utilize dietary carbohydrates as energy sources for growth is limited. Included in the carbohydrate group, cellulose is not tolerated by most fish. In the present study, the grass carp, a typical herbivorous fish, fed with duckweed was selected to study the effect of exogenous cellulase on the growth. The results of 2-month feeding experiment showed that the cellulase promoted the growth of grass carp. In addition, the cellulase increased various digestive enzyme activities, such as cellulase, amylase and protease but not the lipase activity. Meanwhile, the polymerase chain reaction denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (PCR-DGGE) analysis indicated that the intestinal microbiota of fish fed with the supplemental cellulase changed in bacteria species and density. Band patterns derived from control and cellulase samples showed a low degree of similarity when analyzed by cluster analysis. Some bands were unique to control samples, whereas other bands were obtained only with samples of the cellulase group. The 16S rRNA gene sequencing identified that Proteobacteria and Firmicutes were the two dominant groups, and the emergence of certain bacterial strains including Bacilli and Sphingomonas may contribute to the digestion of cellulose. The former researches and this paper results suggest that the endogenous cellulase is far from sufficient to fully digest the ingested fiber, so cellulase should be developed as a kind of aquatic additive. (C) 2013 Published by Elsevier B.V.
