Fig 3 - uploaded by Seong Jae Cha
Content may be subject to copyright.
Apple-green birefringence under examination (magnification × 100). 

Apple-green birefringence under examination (magnification × 100). 

Context in source publication

Context 1
... admission, she was pale and dehydrated. Her blood pressure was 130 / 90 mmHg, heart rate 70 beats / min and a body temperature of 37.2 ° C. Physical examination revealed mild abdominal distension and decreased bowel sound without any peritoneal irritation sign. The muscle strength of the lower extremities was reduced to grade I or II and the muscle mass was atrophied. The deep tendon reflexes were normal. Other findings were unremarkable. Laboratory tests on admission showed urea nitrogen 13.5 mM, creatin- ine 380.1 pM, calcium 2.1 mM, phosphorus 0.61 mM, total protein 44 g / l, and albumin 15 g / l. The serum electrophoresis did not have an M peak. Her haemoglobin count was 8.6 g / dl, white blood cell count 11.0 × 10 9 / l, and platelet count 332 × 10 9 / l. Conservative treatment was started. On the third day after admission, haematemesis was developed and she complained of severe abdominal pain. The CAPD e ffl uent became bloody with a red blood cell count of 0.6 × 10 9 / l and a leukocyte count of 9.0 × 10 9 / l with neutrophilia. Body temperature was 38 ° C and there was abdominal tenderness with peritoneal irritation signs. Emergency gastrofibroscopy showed multiple shallow bleeding ulcerations through- out the stomach and duodenum. Thoracic radiography revealed a large amount of free air under the diaphragm. With the clinical diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal bleeding with viscous perforation, emergency explorola- parotomy was performed. The peritoneal cavity con- tained ~ 500 ml of seropurulent exudate. The entire wall of the small bowel and colon were thickened. The perforation was in the hepatic flexure of the transverse colon. The perforation was 2.0 cm in diameter and had a very thin and friable margin. Right hemicolectomy was conducted. The anterior wall of the body of the stomach was opened. There was active bleeding from the base of the ulcer on the posterior wall of the antrum. Suture ligation was done and gastrotomy was closed. The patient’s post-operative course was downhill and she died on the 8th day after the surgery from septic shock and multiple organ failure. On gross examination of the resected colon, the bowel wall was thickened and multiple shallow ulcerations ranging from 2 to 50 mm were noted (Figure 1). On staining with haemotoxylin and eosin (H&E), amorphous, eosinophilic material was deposited in the submucosa and perivascular area of the intestine (Figure 2). The deposits were positive for Congo Red staining and had apple-green birefringence under polarizing microscopy ( Figure 3). Immunohistochemical study with anti- b -M (Biomeda Corporation, 2 Foster City, CA, USA) and was positive ( Figure 4). DRA was first reported in 1980. Accumulation of b M, 2 a polypeptide with a molecular weight of 118 kDa which is normally present on the surface of class I major histocompatibility antigens, is most likely responsible for this disorder [5]. In general, DRA develops in patients undergoing long-term haemodialysis. Although DRA has been reported in a case of chronic renal failure who had never been dialysed, it usually develops in patients who have received dialysis therapy for > 5 years [1]. These amyloid fibrils have a strong predilection to accumulate in tendons, periarticular structures, at the end of long bones, and within the vertebral disks. The most common clinical manifestation is carpal tunnel syndrome and other musculoskeletal abnormalities are frequent complaints in patients with DRA. Recently, several studies on the distribution of dialysis related amyloid deposits have shown that there is extensive involvement of viscera such as heart, lung, liver, kidney, lymph node, stomach and intestine [6 ]. There are few reports of gastrointestinal involvement of DRA. And it has been suggested that DRA can cause serious gastrointestinal complications such as haemor- rhage, intestinal perforation, obstruction, and infarc- tion [7–10]. Our case was a very unusual one. Although the patient complained of back pain and weakness of lower extremities, there was no radiological evidence of amyloidosis on high resolution skeletal roentgenog- ram. The duration of dialysis therapy was ~ 3 years. According to other reports, the symptoms and signs of DRA appear in patients with long-term dialysis of at least 5 years. The duration of dialysis was not long enough to suspect DRA. In conclusion, dialysis related amyloid can be deposited in solid organs and manifest itself in various ways. DRA should be considered in patients receiving haemodialysis or on CAPD who have unexplained gastrointestinal symptoms. In addition, DRA may develop early in the course of ...

Citations

... Primary and metastatic tumors of the liver can also present with hemoperitoneum [255]. It may occur postcolonoscopy (and does not necessarily indicate a perforation) and has also been reported due to colonic perforation as a consequence of dialysisrelated amyloidosis [256]. ...
... Age/gender Amyloid type Perforation site Sequalae Castleman (1960) [8] 39/M AA Small intestine Dead Shiomura (1979) [9] 24/F AA Small intestine Dead Gonzalez- Sanchez (1989) [10] 31/M AA Colon Alive Oda (1990) [11] b 65/F AA Colon Dead Hoshi (1991) [11] b 55/F AA Colon NA Nonaka (1992) [11] b 72/F AA Colon NA Shimizu (1993) [11] b 62/M AA Rectum Alive Nishimoto (1993) [11] b 74/F AA Colon Dead Gonzalez-Gay (1994) [12] NA AA Colon NA Hashimoto (1995) [13] 83/M AA Small intestine NA Kawashima (1996) [14] NA AA Appendix NA Diaz-Candamio (1998) [15] 70/M AA Colon Alive Thaler (1999) [16] 58/M AA Colon Dead Gonzalez-Gay (2000) [17] NA AA Colon NA Shindo (2000) [11] [18] NA AA Colon NA Orita (2001) [11] b 54/M AA Colon NA Matsuda (2003) [19] 71/M AA NA Alive Toyama (2005) [11] [20] 47/M AA Colon Dead Hosotaki (2007) [11] [21] 63/F AA NA Alive Sato (2009) [22] 53/F AA Small intestine Alive Takeuchi (2010) [11] 62/F AA Rectum NA Zhou (1991) [23] 73/M Ab 2 M Colon Dead Ninomiya (1994) [11] b 56/M Ab 2 M Colon NA Gal (1994) [24] N A A b 2 M Small intestine Dead Araki (1996) [25] 68/M Ab 2 M N A N A Araki (1996) [25] 56/M Ab 2 M Colon NA Khan (1997) [26] 45/M Ab 2 M Oesophagus NA Min (1997) [27] N Heitzman (1962) [29] 68/M AL Oesophagus Alive Akbarian (1964) [30] 61/M AL Small intestine Dead Gilat (1968) [31] 51/M AL Rectum Dead Griffel (1975) [32] 57/M AL Small intestine Alive Gupta (1976) [33] 23/M AL Small intestine Dead Ganzoni (1981) [34] 64/NA AL Stomach Dead Deharo (1988) [35] NA AL Colon NA Shinozaki (1989) [36] b 66/F AL Colon Dead Ishizaki (1991) [37] 60/M AL Small intestine and colon a ...
Article
Gastrointestinal (GI) perforation is remarkably rare in patients with light chain (AL) amyloidosis and has not yet been reported in patients with AL amyloidosis treated with novel agents. Only 24 cases of GI perforation have previously been reported in the setting of AL amyloidosis of which 15 had available information in English. All 15 did not receive novel agent therapy and six died early after experiencing GI perforation. This study reports the characteristics and outcome of AL patients that developed GI perforation in the era of novel agent treatment. Seven patients were reviewed. In two patients, GI perforation was the presenting symptom of AL amyloidosis, whereas five patients developed GI perforations following initiation of an anti-AL therapy (three after bortezomib-based, 1 after lenalidomide-based and 1 after thalidomide-based therapy). All patients underwent surgery and survived the perforation. Treatment was renewed following surgery in six of seven patients, with no further GI complications. In conclusion, GI perforation in AL amyloidosis is rare and mostly reported after treatment initiation. Urgent surgery appears to be lifesaving and renewal of the anti-AL novel therapy appears to be safe, with no significant risk for re-perforation or GI toxicity. Prognosis in these patients is related to severity of the disease and response to therapy rather than the development of GI perforation.
... Thus, E. coli is the most frequently identified causative microorganism: E. coli-related peritonitis is thought to occur from touch contamination or exit-site infection that leads to enteric peritonitis from the intestinal tract, but in many cases the route of bacterial entry is not clear (6). Although previous reports of peritonitis due to intestinal perforation are rare, there have been reports related to perforation by a piece of bamboo (7), peritoneal catheters (8), diverticular perforation (9), colitis (8), and intestinal amyloidosis (10). ...
Article
The patient, a 77-year-old-man, began peritoneal dialysis (PD) in August 2005. In January 2009, he developed lower abdominal pain and cloudy PD effluent. A diagnosis of peritonitis was made and Escherichia coli was detected in cultures of the PD effluent. An abdominal computed tomography scan showed a fish bone in the duodenal wall. An upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was performed, and a 3-cm fish bone was removed. We thus recommend careful investigation with the possibility of enteric peritonitis from the intestinal tract when E. coli is detected in effluent cultures during PD.
Article
Introduction Amyloidosis is an uncommon disease caused by the deposition of amyloid fibrils in tissues. This disease does not usually require surgical intervention, which could be warranted in the presence of complications such as bleeding, obstruction, or perforation. We present a case of primary amyloidosis of the colon in a patient affected by polymyositis who underwent Hartmann’s procedure after a spontaneous colonic perforation. After 2 months of well-being, the patient underwent two consecutive surgical procedures for stenosis of the ostomy orifice. Areas Covered A review of the literature has been performed, gathering case reports highlighting the distribution of this disease by age, gender, location, and treatment when available. Expert Commentary Gastrointestinal amyloid disease is a rare condition, and it could be considered among the rare causes of intestinal perforation. Timely surgical management is often necessary.
Article
症例は46歳,女性.41歳時に骨盤部胞巣状軟部肉腫の治療に伴い右骨盤半裁,人工股関節置換術を施行された.2005年に腎動脈狭窄に対して経皮的腎血管拡張術を施行されたが徐々に腎機能が悪化し,2007年1月に腹膜透析(CAPD)が導入された.2008年3月に転倒し,右大腿骨骨折にて当院整形外科に入院,観血整復固定術・自家腓骨移植術を施行された.5月15日より腹痛を認めたが腹膜炎の所見は認めず,5月21日退院となった.5月29日外来受診時は血液検査所見に異常所見はなかったが,5月30日より腹痛出現,徐々に症状増悪し,6月5日当院を受診し腹膜炎疑いにて緊急入院した.抗生剤の点滴静注(ceftazidime hydrate(CAZ)1 g/日,cefazolin sodium(CEZ)1 g/日,vancomycin hydrochloride(VCM)1 g/日)および腹腔内投与CAZ 1 g/日,CEZ 1 g/日)を施行したが,症状改善せずCAPD排液細胞数は540/μLから940/μLへ上昇した.第5病日,排液細菌培養にて複数菌が判明し,第6病日には腹痛が増悪し,排液は黄色混濁し排液細胞数5,200/μL,腹部CTにてfree airを認め緊急手術となった.大腿骨頭置換のボルトの背側の骨盤腔の間隙に小腸が嵌頓し,回腸末端部より30 cm口側に嵌頓部の穿孔を認めた.術後は集中治療室にて持続的血液透析濾過を施行し,同時にエンドトキシン吸着を施行した.術後経過は順調であり,腹膜透析から血液透析へ移行した.本症例では抗生物質の無効,CAPD排液の色調異常,CAPD排液培養から複数菌の検出などから,通常の細菌性急性腹膜炎ではないと判断し,腹部CTで確定診断に至った.骨盤あるいはその支持組織への侵襲手術後の骨盤内間隙に腸管嵌頓を誘発し,CAPDの中止を余儀なくされた症例を経験した.
Chapter
Peritoneal dialysis is associated with a collection of unique complications apart from peritonitis and those involving the catheter, exit site and tunnel. Some complications are related to increased intraabdominal pressure, such as abdominal hernias and leaks of dialysis fluid. Other complications are similar to those encountered in haemodialysis patients. Examples of these include dialysis-associated amyloidosis and acquired cystic disease of the kidney. Finally, the long-term presence of dialysis fluid in the peritoneal cavity can result in a rare syndrome of sclerosing encapsulating peritonitis. This chapter will address these and other non-infectious complications of peritoneal dialysis.
Article
Full-text available
We experienced a case with an intestinal perforation resulting from dialysisrelated amyloidosis. A fiftysixyear old women who had been receiving hemodialysis for twenty-three years underwent an operation for bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome and destructive spondyloarthropathy. She had experienced the onset of diarrhea four months earlier, and was operated on for perforative peritonitis. The middle part of the small intestine contained a 16×8mm hole. Partial resection of the small bowel and end-to-end anastomosis was performed. A pathological examination revealed an amyloid deposit in a perivascular area of the submucosal layer, and immunohistochemistry for β2-microglobulin was positive. She was diagnosed as having dialysisrelated amyloidosis. Anastomotic leakage occurred early during the post-operative day. She was died five months later because of a sepsis.
Article
Full-text available
A 60-year-old man admitted for abdominal pain was found in chest and abdominal imaging to have free air under the diaphragm and marked dilation of the transverse colon. Based on a diagnosis of perforation peritonitis, we undertook emergency laparotomy. The colon was markedly dilated and the intestinal wall was thin and dark red. We found a colonic perforation at the hepetic flexure, and conducted right hemicolectomy with primary end-to-end anastomosis. Histologically, amyloid was seen throughout the entire colon layer. Congo red staining was positive both before and after treatment with potassium permanganate, and the protein component of the amyloid fibers corresponded to type AL fibers. Although the patients suffered postoperatively respiratory failure, retoperitoneal abscess formation, and wound infection, he recovered and was discharged ambulatory on postoperative day 55. Colonic perforation is one of the severest complications of gastrointestinal amyloidosis, which must be considered in patients with idiopathic digestive tract perforation. Although our patient was successfully treated without anastomotic failure, evaluation and appropriate digestive tract and organ follow-up is essential.