Figure 5 - uploaded by Xiaolin He
Content may be subject to copyright.
An example to show the collision avoidance difficulty. In this case, the subject vehicle (red) is following a leading vehicle (white, 50 m ahead, vn = 8.33 m/s) with a higher velocity (vs = 16.67 m/s). Equation (18) and (19) define the safe velocity set V as the blue area, e.g., if the current subject velocity is any one of the elements in V (e.g., v 1 and v 2 ), the neighbouring vehicle (white) is not looming. Namely, the collision avoidance difficulty is zero. In this example, since the subject vehicle is driving faster than the leading vehicle, the current subject velocity vs / ∈ V , indicating that the neighbouring is looming regarding the subject vehicle. The distance from the subject velocity vs to the safe velocity set V (the safety boundary) is vg (the red arrow), the length of which is the defined collision avoidance difficulty.

An example to show the collision avoidance difficulty. In this case, the subject vehicle (red) is following a leading vehicle (white, 50 m ahead, vn = 8.33 m/s) with a higher velocity (vs = 16.67 m/s). Equation (18) and (19) define the safe velocity set V as the blue area, e.g., if the current subject velocity is any one of the elements in V (e.g., v 1 and v 2 ), the neighbouring vehicle (white) is not looming. Namely, the collision avoidance difficulty is zero. In this example, since the subject vehicle is driving faster than the leading vehicle, the current subject velocity vs / ∈ V , indicating that the neighbouring is looming regarding the subject vehicle. The distance from the subject velocity vs to the safe velocity set V (the safety boundary) is vg (the red arrow), the length of which is the defined collision avoidance difficulty.

Source publication
Preprint
Full-text available
Perceived risk is crucial in designing trustworthy and acceptable vehicle automation systems. However, our understanding of its dynamics is limited, and models for perceived risk dynamics are scarce in the literature. This study formulates a new computational perceived risk model based on potential collision avoidance difficulty (PCAD) for drivers...

Context in source publication

Context 1
... equal sign stands when v s is at the boundary of velocity set V . We define the collision avoidance difficulty ||v g || as the 2D distance from the current subject velocity v s to the boundary of the safe velocity set V (Equation (21)) (See Figure 5 for illustration). If the current subject velocity v s is within the set V , the velocity gap is zero, which means the collision avoidance difficulty is zero. ...

Similar publications

Preprint
Full-text available
In order to improve learners' syntactic understanding and writing ability, thus effectively improving the quality of English writing teaching, this paper explores the method of combining Sequential Matching on Sliding Window Sequences (SMOSS) model with improved Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) model in English writing teaching to improve the effect o...