FIGURE 1 - uploaded by Bipul Kumar Garg
Content may be subject to copyright.
A, Correct reduction with slight flexion with suspension. Arrows indicate direction of forces applied to get reduction of fracture. B, Insertion of Kirschner wire (0.8 mm) from the dorsal side and make a hook at the dorsal end. C, Advance the Kirschner wire (0.8 mm) with the counterforce till the hook compresses the fracture fragment. Arrows indicate direction of counter force while inserting K-wire. D, Cut the Kirschner wire at the ventral end with 2 cm length or less and make another hook. E, Insert another Kirschner wire (1 mm) along the long axis of distal phalanx intramedullary, make an acute angle and another hook leaving 5 mm of distance from the previous Kirschner wire. F, Hang the 2 hooks and apply a dressing over them to prevent further injury.
Source publication
Extension-block pinning is a popular surgical treatment method for mallet fractures but is associated with several pitfalls. Transfixation Kirschner wires used in the extension-block pinning technique may cause iatrogenic nail bed injury, bone fragment rotation, chondral damage, or osteoarthritis. The objective of this study was to determine the re...
Context in source publication
Context 1
... the hook will create tension in initial Kirschner wire and this tension will convert to compression force on the fracture site and that will further decrease the risk of reduction loss. After this step just confirm the reduction under fluoroscopy in both DIP passive flexion and extension and apply a dressing over them to prevent further injury (Fig. 1A-F), allowing the DIP joint to have free movement. The patients were discharged on the day of surgery and requested to return for weekly review by the surgeon who performed the surgery. After Clinical and radiologic conformation of union around 6-8 weeks, the Kirschner wires were removed. For removal first step is to untie the hook, then ...
Similar publications
Background and aim:
Bony Mallet Finger or Mallet Fracture is a common injury of the hand, which follows a forced flexion of the extended distal interphalangeal joint, that leads to a bony avulsion of the distal phalanx. Depending on fracture extension and dislocation, those lesions can either be treated conservatively or surgically. Several surgic...
Citations
There is no consensus on the optimal treatment of bony mallet finger in the paediatric population due to a lack of studies in children. The Ishiguro technique is simple and less invasive, and treatment with K-wire fixation seems to provide better results for extension lag in bony mallet finger according to the literature. A retrospective cross-sectional study with long-term follow-up was performed to evaluate the functional and clinical outcomes of this method in children. Preoperative and intraoperative predictors of outcome were investigated.
From June to December 2022, we evaluated 95 children who underwent extension K-wire block from 2002 to 2012. Eighty-four children were included (mean age 14.8 ± 1.68 years) for a mean long-term follow-up of 11.6 ± 2.3 (8–16) years. Clinical and radiographic features were assessed. Pain and functional outcomes were assessed using Crawford criteria, range of motion (ROM) at the distal interphalangeal joint (DIPJ), loss of extension, and VAS scale. Univariate and multivariate regressions were used to assess which variables might predict the worst outcomes at long-term follow-up.
Bone union and pain relief were always achieved. There were no complaints of potential growth impairment or nail deformity. 82.1% of patients showed excellent and good results. Fifteen patients had fair results.
Although there are currently no significant differences between surgery and orthosis in adults, the Ishiguro technique is more effective in children when it comes to outcomes in the treatment of mallet fingers. A high percentage of excellent and good results were achieved, and no epiphyseal damage or nail deformity was reported. A strong and significant correlation was found between the worst outcomes and either delayed treatment time or excessive flexion angle.
Objective:
To investigate the effectiveness of one-stage closed reduction and elastic compression fixation with double Kirschner wires for Wehbe-Schneider types ⅠB and ⅡB bony mallet fingers.
Methods:
Between May 2017 and June 2020, 21 patients with Wehbe-Schneider type ⅠB and ⅡB bony mallet fingers were treated with one-stage closed reduction and elastic compression fixation using double Kirschner wires. There were 15 males and 6 females with an average age of 39.2 years (range, 19-62 years). The causes of injury were sports injury in 9 cases, puncture injury in 7 cases, and sprain in 5 cases. The time from injury to admission was 5-72 hours (mean, 21.0 hours). There were 2 cases of index finger injury, 8 cases of middle finger injury, 9 cases of ring finger injury, and 2 cases of little finger injury. The angle of active dorsiflexion loss of distal interphalangeal joint (DIPJ) was (40.04±4.02)°. According to the Wehbe-Schneider classification standard, there were 10 cases of typeⅠB and 11 cases of type ⅡB. The Kirschner wire was removed at 6 weeks after operation when X-ray film reexamination showed bony union of the avulsion fracture, and the functional exercise of the affected finger was started.
Results:
The operation time was 35-55 minutes (mean, 43.9 minutes). The length of hospital stay was 2-5 days (mean, 3.4 days). No postoperative complications occurred. All patients were followed up 6-12 months (mean, 8.8 months). X-ray films reexamination showed that all avulsion fractures achieved bony union after 4-6 weeks (mean, 5.3 weeks). Kirschner wire was removed at 6 weeks after operation. After Kirschner removal, the visual analogue scale (VAS) score of pain during active flexion of the DIPJ was 1-3 (mean, 1.6); the VAS score of pain was 2-5 (mean, 3.1) when the DIPJ was passively flexed to the maximum range of motion. The angle of active dorsiflexion loss of affected finger was (2.14±2.54)°, showing significant difference when compared with preoperative angle (t=52.186, P<0.001). There was no significant difference in the active flexion angle between the affected finger (79.52±6.31)° and the corresponding healthy finger (81.90±5.36)° (t=1.319, P=0.195). At 6 months after operation, according to Crawford functional evaluation criteria, the effectiveness was rated as excellent in 11 cases, good in 9, and fair in 1, with an excellent and good rate of 95.24%.
Conclusion:
For Wehbe-Schneider typesⅠB and ⅡB bony mallet fingers, one-stage closed reduction and elastic compression fixation with double Kirschner wires can effectively correct the deformity and has the advantages of simple surgery, no incision, and no influence on the appearance of the affected finger.
Acute tendon and bony injuries of the distal phalanx are challenging injuries because they may result in chronic pain, hypersensitivity, stiffness, and deformity if they are not adequately treated. Flexor tendon avulsions require early surgical repair. Conversely, most extensor tendon injuries and fractures heal well with nonoperative treatment. However, surgery is indicated in selected patients, and meticulous technique is required to achieve good postoperative outcomes. In this article, we outline the pertinent clinical anatomy of the distal phalanx, review the current literature regarding treatment options, and highlight key management points to ensure good clinical outcomes while minimizing complications.
