Groundwater is the most significant source of fresh water for a variety of uses, including industrial, irrigation, drinking and domestic purposes. Nowadays, excessive usage of groundwater resource is taking place, to meet water demand for industrial, agricultural and domestic uses. Nevertheless, excessive use of groundwater has resulted in the depletion of this natural resource. A gradual decline in groundwater quality is also taking place, as industrial, farming and domestic effluents entering into the hydrological cycle. To counteract groundwater resource depletion and deterioration, it is pertinent to understand the physics of groundwater flow and contaminant transport processes and to develop strategies for groundwater resources management and groundwater remediation.
Numerical techniques such as finite difference method (FDM) and finite element method (FEM) are commonly used for groundwater flow and transport simulation. However, the analytic element method (AEM) has certain capabilities which overcome the difficulties associated with grid-based algorithms. In AEM, only the hydrogeologic features in the domain are broken up into sections and entered into the model as input data. AEM eliminates the compromise between model resolution and size of the model area. Also, AEM generates very accurate hydraulic head at pumping well location, which in turn improves the quality of the groundwater management model. On the contrary, in FDM/FEM, the hydraulic head at the pumping well location is the averaged hydraulic head over the grid. In the particle tracking method to track particles at each time step, it is necessary to know the position of a particle as well as its velocity. AEM-based flow models compute continuous velocities over the entire aquifer domain, and hence for the reverse particle tracking (RPT) and random walk particle tracking (RWPT) simulation, there is no need to use any velocity interpolation schemes as generally required in FDM or FEM based models. Further, the Eulerian transport models, such as FDM/FEM based models are often plagued by numerical dispersion and artificial oscillations if spatial and temporal discretization criteria do not meet properly. As an alternative, the random walk particle tracking (RWPT) simulates the advection-dispersion equation in a different manner and it is completely free from the numerical dispersion. The analytic element method is amenable for reverse particle tracking or random walk particle tracking and they have various advantages as mentioned above.
In this context, the main scope of the present study is to develop groundwater flow and contaminant transport simulation models using analytic element method, reverse particle tracking, and random walk particle tracking and to couple the simulation models with efficient optimization algorithm such as cat swarm optimization to get the effective simulation-optimization model for groundwater management and remediation. In this study, an AEM-RPT model is developed by combining analytic element method with reverse particle tracking. The AEM-RPT model is used to delineate the time-related capture zone of well-field. Further, the AEM-RWPT model is developed by combining analytic element method with random walk particle tracking. The AEM-RWPT model is applied to simulate groundwater flow and contaminant transport processes (advection and hydrodynamic dispersion) of heterogeneous hypothetical and field aquifer. Furthermore, the accuracy and computational efficiency of the AEM-RWPT model is enhanced by combining it with kernel density estimator (KDE). Additional features are included in the AEM-RWPT-KDE model to simulate radioactive decay and linear adsorption isotherm. The AEM-RWPT-KDE model is effectively used to solve the advection-dispersion-reaction equation (ADRE). The effectiveness of the developed model is verified with MODFLOW-MT3DMS and found to be satisfactory.
Heuristic optimization technique, such as Genetic Algorithm (GA), Simulated Annealing (SA), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Harmony Search (HS), Tabu Search (TS) and Differential Evolution (DE) are most commonly used for various groundwater management and groundwater remediation studies. All these optimization algorithms have advantages as well as limitations. Among these optimization algorithms, the particle swarm optimization is very popular and relatively easy to implement. However, the particle swarm optimization (PSO) can be influenced by stagnation point problem and parameter convergence error. Recently, a relatively new swarm optimization technique, namely Cat Swarm Optimization (CSO) is gaining considerable attention in various engineering fields. In Cat swarm optimization (CSO), search operation takes place via two modes (Seeking and Tracking mode). So, in case the solution is trapped in stagnation point, then there are greater chances of escaping from stagnation point, via inertia term and seeking mode process. Considering, the recent popularity of CSO, in the present study the cat swarm optimization is considered to develop the optimization model for groundwater resources management and groundwater remediation design.
In this study, two new simulation-optimization (S-O) models for groundwater management (AEM-CSO and AEM-RPT-CSO) are developed by coupling analytic element method with reverse particle tracking and cat swarm optimization. The AEM-CSO model is applied for groundwater management in a hypothetical unconfined aquifer considering two objectives separately: maximization of the total pumping and minimization of the total pumping cost. Also, an attempt is made to minimize groundwater contamination risk through capture zone management of pumping wells by AEM-RPT-CSO model. Further, a coupled AEM-MOCSO model is also developed by coupling analytic element method with multiobjective cat swarm optimization (MOSCO). The AEM-MOCSO model is applied to a hypothetical unconfined aquifer by considering two objectives together: maximization of the total pumping and minimization of the total pumping cost.
There are significant challenges, to directly incorporate analytic element method and random walk particle tracking in an optimization model for groundwater remediation, as both of them are computationally expensive. To deal this issue, in this study, an artificial neural network (ANN) and cat swarm based surrogate simulation-optimization model are developed for groundwater remediation. The ANN mimics the behavior of AEM-RWPT-KDE model. The ANN-CSO model is applied to remediate a hypothetical and field case study. Further, a simulation-optimization model is developed for multiobjective groundwater remediation by coupling artificial neural network with multiobjective cat swarm optimization (MOCSO). Here also, the ANN model acts as a proxy simulator for AEM-RWPT-KDE model. The ANN-MOCSO model is applied to a hypothetical and field case study for multiobjective groundwater remediation showing the effectiveness of the developed model.
The present study shows that AEM, RPT, and RWPT based models are very effective in groundwater flow and transport simulation. When these models are coupled with an efficient optimization tool such as CSO, we get robust simulation-optimization models, which can be effectively used in groundwater management and remediation designs.