Content uploaded by N. Nekrasov
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by N. Nekrasov on Sep 23, 2014
Content may be subject to copyright.
September 23, 2014 16:1 WSPC/Trim Size: 9.75in x 6.5in for Proceedings Lisbonne
LOCALIZING GAUGE THEORIES I.
NIKITA A. NEKRASOV
∗
Institut des Hautes Etudes Scientifiques
35 route de Chartres,
91440 Bures-sur-Yvette, FRANCE
E-mail: nikita@ihes.fr
We study N = 2 supersymmetric gauge theories on toric four dimensional manifolds. We
recall the notion of Ω-background and calculate the partition function of gauge theory
in this background. As a result, we get generalizations of the formulae of the author for
the theories on R
4
and Nakajima-Yoshioka for the theories on R
4
blown up at one point.
In the case of compact toric space our results give an alternative derivation of Donaldson
invariants, and generalize the results of G¨ottche-Zagier.
1. Introduction
In the past years some progress has been achieved in the quantum field theory
calculations of the low-energy effective actions including non-perturbative
effects. N = 2 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory has simple perturbation
theory and non-trivial instanton dynamics. By utilizing supersymmetry one
is able to calculate the instanton corrections to the low-energy effective ac-
tion [23]. This is done by placing N = 2 gauge theory in a non-trivial
geometric background, involving R-symmetry currents. In this paper we
shall generalize the results of [23]. Namely, we study N = 2 gauge theory
on a toric four-manifold X. The motivations for this work are manifold.
First, we hope to learn about the gauge theory applications of the holomor-
phic anomaly, which is well-known in the context of topological strings [1,3].
Secondly, the similar formulae are expected to hold in the higher dimensional
generalizations of the supersymmetric gauge theories. There, the applica-
tions to the black hole counting [30] are expected. Also, the topological
vertex and Donaldson-Thomas theory also behave in the similar way. The
crucial ingredient missing in all these problems is the detailed understanding
of the stability conditions. Since in the case of Donaldson theory lots of in-
formation is already available, e.g. in the work [8], we may hope to advance
∗
On leave of absence from Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics
1
September 23, 2014 16:1 WSPC/Trim Size: 9.75in x 6.5in for Proceedings Lisbonne
2 Nikita Nekrasov
along this route.
2. N = 2 gauge theory
We study pure N = 2 gauge theory. Generalizations involving matter are
straightforward. It is well-known that the theory admits the so-called twist-
ing [29], which permits supersymmetric compactifications on arbitrary four-
manifold X. The field content of the twisted theory (which turns out to be
the integral representation of Donaldson theory) is the following: the gauge
field A, the complex adjoint scalar φ, and the adjoint fermions: one-form ψ,
self-dual two-form χ and a scalar η.
On generic X the twisted theory admits one nilpotent supercharge Q, also
called topological charge. If the holonomy of X is reduced then there are
extra charges, coming from the original supercharges of the physical theory
of the same chirality as Q. If the manifold X admits isometries, then there
are extra conserved supercharges G of opposite chirality. Mathematically,
the theory on X studies equivariant cohomology of the space of gauge fields.
In addition to the gauge group, the equivariance with respect to isometries
of X is quite useful in analyzing the theory.
The bosonic part of the N = 2 theory action is given by:
S
bos
=
Z
Tr
kF k
2
+ kD
A
φk
2
+ k[φ,
¯
φ]k
2
(1)
3. Ω-background, local theory: R
4
We start with the theory on R
4
. Suppose Ω,
¯
Ω are two commuting infinites-
imal rotations of Euclidean space R
4
, [Ω,
¯
Ω] = 0, Ω = kΩ
µν
k. These are
generated by the vector fields V,
¯
V , V
µ
= Ω
µ
ν
x
ν
, and the indices are lifted
by the Euclidean metric δ
µν
. We skip the details and the motivation of
the construction [23]. The bosonic part of the action of the theory in the
Ω-background is given by:
S
bos
=
Z
Tr
kF k
2
+ kD
A
φ − ι
V
F k
2
+ k[φ,
¯
φ] − ι
¯
V
D
A
φ + ι
V
D
A
¯
φk
2
(2)
4. Instanton partition function on R
4
In [23] we calculated the partition function of the gauge theory in the Ω-
background. It depends on the skew eigen-values
1
,
2
of the matrix Ω and
the vev a of the Higgs field φ.
September 23, 2014 16:1 WSPC/Trim Size: 9.75in x 6.5in for Proceedings Lisbonne
Localizing gauge theory 3
4.1. Higher times
The action Eq. (2) is the bosonic part of the integral of ch
2
=
1
2
Trφ
2
over
the superspace. Formally one can consider the integral of any function
f(ch
1
, ch
2
, ch
3
, . . .) where
ch
p
=
1
p
Tr
φ
2πi
p
(3)
(only N of ch
p
are independent). We expand:
f =
X
p
τ
p
ch
p
+
X
p
1
p
2
τ
p
1
p
2
ch
p
1
ch
p
2
+ . . .
The parameters τ = (τ
p
|τ
p
1
p
2
| . . .) are called times. All but τ
2
should be
viewed as formal parameters.
4.2. Partition function
The calculation in [10, 22, 23] gives:
Z(a, τ,
1
,
2
) =
X
~
k
µ
~
k
(a,
1
,
2
)expf
~τ
( ˆm
p
(a,
k,
1
,
2
)) (4)
ˆm
p
(a,
k,
1
,
2
) =
X
l
a
p
l
+
+
X
l,i
(a
l
+
1
(i −1))
p
− (a
l
+
1
i)
p
− (a
l
+
1
(i −1) +
2
k
li
)
p
+ (a
l
+
1
i +
2
k
li
)
p
where
k = (k
1
, . . . , k
N
) is the N-tuple of partitions,
k
l
= (k
l1
≥ k
l2
≥ k
l3
≥ . . . ≥ k
lk
0
l1
> 0)
Finally µ
~
k
(a,
1
,
2
) is the measure on partitions, derived in [23]:
µ
~
k
(a,
1
,
2
) = exp
Z
dxdyf
00
~
k
(x)f
00
~
k
(y)γ
1
,
2
(x − y) (5)
and the function f
~
k
(the profile of the colored partition
k) , and the kernel γ
are defined in [22].
September 23, 2014 16:1 WSPC/Trim Size: 9.75in x 6.5in for Proceedings Lisbonne
4 Nikita Nekrasov
4.3. Expansion of the partition function on R
4
In order to proceed with more general four-manifolds we need the partition
function on R
4
to be evaluated for the most general parameters, both toric
1
,
2
and the couplings τ
~n
. Expansion in
1
,
2
has the following form:
Z(a,
1
,
2
; τ
~n
) = exp
F
0
1
2
+
1
+
2
1
2
H
1
2
+ F
1
+
(
1
+
2
)
2
1
2
G
1
+ O(
1
,
2
) (6)
where F
0
, F
1
, H
1
2
, G
1
are functions of a, τ
~n
.
5. Ω-background, global theory
The standard Donaldson theory in four dimensions can be viewed as the
partially twisted six dimensional super-Yang-Mills theory, compacitifed on
T
2
× X, where X is our four-fold, and the torus T
2
has vanishing size.
For X with isometries we modify this construction. Consider flat X-
bundle over T
2
, which can be viewed as an orbifold of R
2
× X by the action
of Z
2
, which acts by shifts in R
2
direction, and by two commuting isometries
g
1
, g
2
in the X direction:
(z, ¯z, x) 7→ (z + n + mτ, ¯z + n + m¯τ, g
n
1
g
m
2
· x) (7)
By compactifying the gauge theory on this background, with the partial
twist along X, in the limit of vanishing volume of T
2
we end up with the
theory in the Ω-background. The bosonic part of its action coincides with
Eq. (2).
5.1. Toric preliminaries
In this section we collect all the necessary information about toric varieties.
We use slightly unconventional language, which is more familiar to physicists.
Let M, d be non-negative integers, and T
M
, T
d
, T
M+d
the standard tori
U(1)
M,d,M+d
of the corresponding dimensions. In what follows a runs from
a to M + d, α runs from 1 to M, µ runs from 1 to d, and l runs from 1 to
N. The torus T
M+d
acts in the standard fashion on the space C
M+d
:
Z = (Z
a
) 7→ (Z
a
exp iθ
a
)
Any integral matrix Q : Z
M
→ Z
M+d
defines a homomorphism of T
M
into
T
M+d
, and the corresponding action of T
M
on C
M+d
:
Z = (Z
a
) 7→
Z
a
exp i
X
α
Q
a
α
ϕ
α
!
September 23, 2014 16:1 WSPC/Trim Size: 9.75in x 6.5in for Proceedings Lisbonne
Localizing gauge theory 5
This action preserves the norms: p
a
=
1
2
|Z
a
|
2
and the symplectic form
ω =
X
i
dp
a
∧ dϑ
a
Z
a
=
p
2p
a
e
iϑ
a
Now, fix a collection r of M real numbers r
1
, . . . , r
M
– Fayet-Illiopoulos
terms in the physical language – and consider the Hamiltonian reduction of
C
M+d
with respect to T
M
at the level of the moment map
m = (m
1
, . . . , m
M
), m
α
=
X
a
Q
a
α
p
a
given by r. Explicitly, we consider the space
X =
m
−1
(r)/T
M
This is our toric variety. By construction, it comes endowed with the map:
p : X → R
M+d
+
which factors through the projection
X → X/T
d
= ∆
X
where T
d
= T
M+d
/T
M
. We neglect possible torsion part (it is absent for
generic Q). The image of ∆
X
under p is the convex d-dimensional polyhedron
(perhaps non-compact), which fits some d-dimensional affine subspace bL
d
in R
M+d
+
. Another canonical structure on X is a set of complex line bundles
L
α
and L
a
. More precisely, any character χ of the torus T
M
defines a line
bundle, which is associated with the help of χ to the principal T
M
bundle:
m
−1
(r) → X (8)
All of the above is said under the assumption of genericity of r, so that the
Eq. (8) indeed defines a principal bundle. The line bundles L
a
are associated
to the characters χ
M
a
= expiQ
a
α
ϕ
α
, while L
α
are associated to χ
M
α
= expiϕ
α
.
Hence, topologically:
L
a
≈ ⊗
α
L
⊗Q
a
α
α
(9)
The torus T
M+d
acts on X. Of course, only T
d
acts faithfully. The full torus
T
M+d
becomes visible when we start looking at the line bundles over X.
Then L
a
become distinct line bundles as T
M+d
equivariant bundles. They
correspond to the characters χ
M+d
a
= e
iθ
a
. In what follows we shall denote
χ
M+d
simply by χ.
The fixed points v of T
d
action on X are the vertices of ∆
X
. Generically,
these vertices have d edges emanating from them. These edges correspond
September 23, 2014 16:1 WSPC/Trim Size: 9.75in x 6.5in for Proceedings Lisbonne
6 Nikita Nekrasov
to fixed complex projective lines in X (if X is non-compact the edges may
go all the way to infinity, in this case they correspond to the fixed complex
lines in X).
The tangent space T
v
X to X at any fixed point is a representation of T
d
,
and, consequently, a representation of T
M+d
. The representation splits as a
sum of d one-dimensional irreducibles:
T
v
X =
d
M
µ=1
χ
v,µ
where we took the liberty of identifying the characters with the one dimen-
sional representations. The characters χ
v,µ
define the weights of the T
M+d
action on T
v
X:
χ
v,µ
= expa
X
a
w
v,µ;a
θ
a
(10)
which clearly obey:
X
a
w
v,µ;a
Q
a
α
= 0, ∀α
Each fixed point v defines a subset I
v
of the set of indices {1, . . . , M + d} of
cardinality d, such that for any
∀a ∈ I
v
Z
a
(v) = 0
It is natural to label the elements of I
v
by the index µ = 1, . . . , d. In other
words, I
v
coincides with the set of weight subspaces of T
v
X.
The remaining M coordinates Z
i
are completely fixed by the moment map
equations, up to the action of T
M
. Let Z
M
v
⊂ (Z
M+d
)
t
denote the sub-lattice
{(n
1
, . . . , n
M+d
)|n
a
= 0, a ∈ I
v
}, and R
M
v
= Z
M
v
⊗ R. Then
∂(v) ∈ R
M
v
. Let
Q
v
denote the restriction of Q
t
onto Z
M
v
. It must be invertible over Z in
order for v to be isolated fixed point. Then:
w
v,µ;a
=
δ
µ;a
− Q
µ
α
(Q
−1
v
)
α
a
(11)
5.1.1. Second cohomology
The line bundles L
a
generate the K-group of X. Their first Chern classes
generate H
2
(X, Z). In the T
M+d
-equivariant cohomology they are repre-
sented by the equivariantly closed forms: φ
a
+ c
1
(L
a
). In the localized
cohomology, which is spanned by the fixed points v ∈ X
T
, each point con-
tributing a copy of C((ε
1
, . . . , ε
M+d
)), the Chern classes localized to φ
(v)
a
,
which are linear functions of ε
a
.
September 23, 2014 16:1 WSPC/Trim Size: 9.75in x 6.5in for Proceedings Lisbonne
Localizing gauge theory 7
In the applications of gauge theory to four-manifold invariants one studies
correlators of the 2-observables, say for single trace operators: O
(2)
J
. We
evaluate integrated 2-observables using localization formula:
Z
Σ
O
(2)
f
=
X
v
H
(v)
Σ
f(ch
p
(E
v
)) (12)
where: Σ is the 2-homology class, and H
Σ
+P.D.[Σ] is the equivariant version
of its Poincare dual, H
Σ
is a function on X, linear in p
i
, and H
(v)
Σ
its value
at the fixed point v. Finally, E
v
is the localized universal sheaf, i.e. ι
∗
v
E,
where ι
v
: M × {v} → M × X is the inclusion, where M is the moduli space
of sheaves (compactified instanton moduli space).
5.2. Equivariant bundles
In gauge theory with gauge group G we usually fix the principal G-bundle P,
integrate over the space of all connections on P and then sum over topological
classes of P . When we formulate the theory on some curved manifold X we
have to fix the metric on X. If the manifold X is a toric variety the metric is
uniquely specified by the matrix of charges Q and the set of Fayet-Iliopoulos
terms r. If we want to turn on the Ω-background an extra data is needed,
namely the lift of the action of the torus T
M+d
on P . For the gauge group
G = SU(N) this is the same as the choice of N-dimensional representation
E of T
M+d
. The latter is specified by the matrix
k
l,a
, l = 1, . . . , N , a = 1, . . . M + d (13)
of weights. The rank N vector bundle splits as a sum of N line bundles L
l
,
of Chern classes:
c
1
(L
l
) =
X
a
k
l,a
Q
a
α
c
1
(L
α
)
5.3. Examples
(1) Let us consider X = CP
d
, which corresponds to M = 1. In this case
∆
X
is just a simplex,
X
a
p
a
= r
(if r > 0, of course). The fixed points v are in one-to-one correspon-
dence with the vertices of the simplex, i.e. we can set v = 1, . . . M + 1,
p
v
= (0, . . . , r, . . . , 0)
v
September 23, 2014 16:1 WSPC/Trim Size: 9.75in x 6.5in for Proceedings Lisbonne
8 Nikita Nekrasov
(2) The next example is non-compact. X is the total space of the vector
bundle O(q
1
) ⊕ O(q
d−1
) over P
1
. It corresponds to M = 1, the vector
of charges:
Q = (q
1
, q
2
, . . . , q
d−1
, 1, 1)
t
There are two fixed points v - they belong to the zero section of the
vector bundle, and are the North and South poles of the sphere.
5.4. Stability and holomorphic anomaly
The partition function of the gauge theory in Ω-background is analytic in
the vev of the Higgs field. However the expansion in the parameters
1
,
2
in the limit → 0 leads to holomorphic functions in a, F
0
(a; Λ), F
1
(a; Λ)
etc which are actually not single-valued. They can be made single valued
at the expense of adding some non-holomorphic terms (the example of the
second Eisenstein series E
2
is helpful here). The precise expression of these
non-holomorphic terms is not known. We are proposing an approach below
which should fix them, at least partly.
Another, more profound, reason to expect them is to recall the Gromov-
Witten interpretation of the N = 2 partition functions. At least in the
case
1
= −
2
the expansion coefficients F
g
(a; Λ) are (the limits of) the
generating functions of the genus g Gromov-Witten invariants of certain
(local) Calabi-Yau manifolds, see Ref. [28]. These are well-known to be the
large ¯a limits of non-holomorphic automorphic forms on the moduli spaces
of Kahler structures of these Calabi-Yaus, see Refs. [1, 3].
6. MASTER FORMULA
We are now almost ready to state our main formula.
We first fix the vacuum expectation value of the Higgs field Φ,
hΦi = a ≡ diag(a
1
, . . . , a
N
) (14)
In the case of compact X we should take the integral over a, to take into
account the tunneling between different vacua.
The second cohomology group of X is isomorphic to Z
d
, generically. The
U(N) gauge bundle is reduced to the U(1)
N
bundle, in the presence of
the Higgs vev. We should sum over all equivalence classes of the U(1)
N
bundles. They are classified by the vectors
k
α
= (k
α,l
), α = 1, . . . , d. In
the SU(N )/Z
N
gauge theory one fixes the traces: {
k
α
} = w
α
=
P
N
l=1
k
α,l
.
Actually, in the absence of the charged matter, everything depends only on
September 23, 2014 16:1 WSPC/Trim Size: 9.75in x 6.5in for Proceedings Lisbonne
Localizing gauge theory 9
w
a
modN. Equivariantly, as we discussed above, topologically equivalent line
bundles may differ. So in fact we might sum over equivalence classes of
equivariant line bundles. These are labelled by vectors
k
e
∈ Z
N
, for each
edge e of the toric diagram ∆
X
. Equivalent information is contained in the
vectors
k
a
= (k
a,l
) from Eq. (13). However, the choice of equivariant bundle
does not correspond to the fluctuating parameter. So the real sum goes over
k
α
only. Moreover, the actual set of vectors
k
α
is even smaller, because of
the so-called stability conditions, to be mentioned below.
The partition function of the N = 2 theory in Ω-background on the toric
manifold X, in the presence of 2-observables,
hexp
X
~n
Z
t
~p
O
(2)
ch
p
1
ch
p
2
...
i, t
~n
∈ H
2
c
(X, Z)
is given by:
Z
~w
(a, ε; τ
~n
, t
~n
) =
X
~
k
a
∈Z
N
,{
~
k
α
}=w
α
Y
v
Z(a + ε ·
k
v
, w
v1
, w
v2
; τ
~n
+ t
~n
H
v
) (15)
where ε ·
k
v
is given by:
(
X
a
w
ia
ε
a
p
a
)
6.1. Non-equivariant limit
In the case of compact X the partition function (15) has a finite non-
equivariant limit, i.e. the limit where ε → 0. Indeed, the singular terms
in the logarithm of partition function vanish thanks to the identity:
X
v
1
w
v1
w
v2
=
Z
X
1 = 0,
X
v
φ
(v)
a
(ε)
w
v1
w
v2
=
Z
X
c
1
(L
a
) = 0 (16)
X
v
w
v1
+ w
v2
w
v1
w
v2
=
Z
X
c
1
(X) = 0
and the finite part reduces to:
Z
~w
(a; τ
~n
, t
~n
) =
X
~
k
a
∈Z
N
,{
~
k
a
}=w
a
exp
Z
X
F
0
(a +
X
a
k
a
c
1
(L
a
))+ (17)
+
Z
X
c
1
(X)H
1
2
(a +
X
a
k
a
c
1
(L
a
)) + χ(X)F
1
(a) + σ(X)G
1
(a)
September 23, 2014 16:1 WSPC/Trim Size: 9.75in x 6.5in for Proceedings Lisbonne
10 Nikita Nekrasov
If we now integrate over a then the resulting function of τ ,
t (for τ =
(logΛ, 0, 0, . . .)) is, in fact, the generating function of Donaldson invariants
of X, for some specific choice of the metric on X. This choice is correlated
with the choice of contour for the a integral. Put another way, the sum over
k
a
’s goes over some subset of all possible first Chern classes. This subset is
singled out by some stability condition, which involves explicitly the Kahler
class of X (i.e. the choice of r).
6.2. Non-holomorphic speculations
Looking at the non-equivariant limit of the partition function we recognize
the holomorphic approach formulae of Ref. [13], see also Ref. [8] . There,
the low-energy effective theory of N = 2 super Yang-Mills theory was ex-
ploited in order to write down a contribution of the Coulomb branch to the
Donaldson invariants of manifolds with b
+
2
= 1 (all toric manifolds have this
property). More systematic approach, taking into account full multiplet of
N = 2 susy leads to the non-holomorphic integrand, see Ref. [13,19], whose
integral can be converted to the contour integral of a holomorphic form, sim-
ilar to what we have above. We hope to infer from this the non-holomorphic
modular completion of our master formula.
6.3. Relation to the results of Nakajima-Yoshioka
This section is devoted to the simplest non-trivial example of the application
of the formula (15): X =
ˆ
C
2
, the blowup of a point on C
2
. It is a toric
manifold, M = 1, d = 2. In this case the formula (15) reduces to:
Z
X,w
(a,
1
,
2
,
3
; τ
~n
, t
~n
) = (18)
X
~
k∈Z
N
,{
~
k}=w
Z(a +
k
1
,
1
+
3
,
2
−
1
; τ
~n
+ t
~n
(
1
+
3
))×
Z(a +
k
2
,
1
−
2
,
2
+
3
; τ
~n
+ t
~n
(
2
+
3
))
which, for
3
= 0 coincides with the result of Ref. [21].
Acknowledgments
I would like to thank the organizers of the Congress for the beautiful con-
ference, and for inviting me to give a lecture.
I also wish to thank A. Losev and A. Okounkov for useful discussions.
Research was partially supported by 01-01-00549 grant from RFFI.
September 23, 2014 16:1 WSPC/Trim Size: 9.75in x 6.5in for Proceedings Lisbonne
Lo calizing gauge theory 11
References
1. I. Antoniadis, E. Gava, K. Narain, T. Taylor, Nucl. Phys. B413 (1994) 162
2. M. Atiyah, V. Drinfeld, N. Hitchin, Yu. Manin, Phys. Lett. 65A (1978) 185
3. M. Bershadsky, S. Cecotti, H. Ooguri, C. Vafa, “Kodaira-Sprencer theory of gravity
and exact results for quantum string amplitudes”, Comm. Math. Phys. 165, 311-428
(1994), hep-th/9309140
4. J. J. Duistermaat, G.J. Heckman, Invent. Math. 69 (1982) 259
M. Atiyah, R. Bott, Topology 23 No 1 (1984) 1
M. Atiyah, R. Bott, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London A 308 (1982), 524-615
E. Witten, hep-th/9204083
S. Cordes, G. Moore, S. Rangoolam, hep-th/9411210
R. Bott, J. Diff. Geom. 4 (1967) 311
G. Ellingsrud, S.A.Stromme, Invent. Math. 87 (1987) 343-352
L. G¨ottche, Math. A.. 286 (1990) 193-207
5. A. Gorsky, A. Marshakov, A. Mironov, A. Morozov, Nucl. Phys. B527 (1998) 690-716,
hep-th/9802007
6. G. Ellingsrud, L. G¨ottsche, alg-geom/9506019, alg-geom/9410005; L. G¨ottsche, alg-
geom/9506018
7. A.Gorsky, I.Krichever, A.Marshakov, A.Mironov and A.Morozov, Phys. Lett. B355
(1995) 466; hep-th/9505035.
8. L. G¨ottsche, D.Zagier, alg-geom/9612020
9. A. Iqbal, N. Nekrasov, A. Okounkov, C. Vafa, “Quantum foam and topological strings”,
ITEP-TH-60/03 ,IHES/P/03/65, hep-th/0312022
10. A. Losev, A. Marshakov, N. Nekrasov, “Small Instantons, Little Strings and Free
Fermions”, ITEP-TH-18/03, MPIM-2003-26, FIAN/TD-05/03, IHES-P/03/09, hep-
th/0302191
11. A. Losev, G. Moore, S. Shatashvili, hep-th/9707250
N. Seiberg, hep-th/9705221
12. A. Losev, G. Moore, N. Nekrasov, S. Shatashvili, hep-th/9509151
13. A. Losev, N. Nekrasov, S. Shatashvili, hep-th/9711108, hep-th/9801061
14. A. Losev, N. Nekrasov, S. Shatashvili, hep-th/9908204, hep-th/9911099
15. I. Macdonald, “Symmetric functions and Hall polynomials”, Oxford University Press,
1998
16. D. Maulik, N. Nekrasov, A. Okounkov, R. Pandharipande, “Gromov-Witten theory
and Donaldson-Thomas theory”, ITEP-TH-61/03 , IHES/M/03/67, math.AG/0312059
17. G. Moore, N. Nekrasov, S. Shatashvili, “D-particle bound states and generalized in-
stantons” Comm. Math. Phys. 209, 77-95 (2000), hep-th/9803265
18. G. Moore, N. Nekrasov, S. Shatashvili, hep-th/9712241, hep-th/9803265
19. G. Moore, E. Witten, hep-th/9709193
20. H. Nakajima, “Lectures on Hilbert Schemes of Points on Surfaces”
AMS University Lecture Series, 1999, ISBN 0-8218-1956-9.
21. H. Nakajima, K. Yoshioka, math.AG/0306198, math.AG/0311058
22. N. Nekrasov, A. Okounkov, “Seiberg-Witten theory and random partitions”, ITEP-
TH-36/03, IHES-P/03/43, hep-th/0306238
23. N. Nekrasov, “Seiberg-Witten prepotential from instanton counting”, hep-th/0206161
24. N. Seiberg, E. Witten, hep-th/9407087, hep-th/9408099
25. N. Seiberg, E. Witten, hep-th/9908142, JHEP 9909(1999) 032
26. K. Ueno, K. Takasaki, Adv. Studies in Pure Math. 4 (1984) 1
27. A. M. Vershik, “Hook formulae and related identities”, Zapiski sem. LOMI, 172
September 23, 2014 16:1 WSPC/Trim Size: 9.75in x 6.5in for Proceedings Lisbonne
12 Nikita Nekrasov
(1989), 3-20 (in Russian)
S. V. Kerov, A. M. Vershik, “Asymptotics of the Plancherel measure of the symmetric
group and the limiting shape of the Young diagrams”, DAN SSSR, 233 (1977), 1024-
1027 (in Russian)
S. V. Kerov, “Random Young tableaux”, Teor. veroyat. i ee primeneniya, 3v(1986),
627-628 (in Russian)
28. S. Katz, A. Klemm, C. Vafa, hep-th/9609239
29. E. Witten, Comm. Math. Phys. 117 (1988) 353
30. H. Ooguri, A. Strominger, C. Vafa, Black Hole Attractors and the Topological String,
hep-th/0405146