Content uploaded by Erik Van Bockstaele
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Erik Van Bockstaele
Content may be subject to copyright.
International Turfgrass Society
Research Journal Volume 9, 2001. 353
EFFECTS OF SHADING ON PHOTOSYNTHETIC CAPACITY AND GROWTH OF
TURFGRASS SPECIES
J.M. Van Huylenbroeck* and E. Van Bockstaele
ABSTRACT
Shade affects remarkably the durability and development of turf surfaces. Species dependent differences
are hereby observed. Objectives of present study were to examine effects of reduced irradiance (65% of ambient
sunl~ght) on photosynthetic capacity, pigment content and growth of commercial cultivars of perennial ryegrass
(Loltum. perenne
L.), red fescue
(Festuca rubra
L.), smooth-stalked meadowgrass
(Poa pratensis
L.) and crested hairgrass
(Koelena macrantha
(Ledeb.) Schultes). For most cultivars (except 'Enjoy', 'Bartitia' and 'Limousine') leaf elonga-
tion was stronger under reduced irradiance compared to full sunlight. Grass coverage decreased under shading.
This reduction was highest for
L.perenne.
Under shade conditions chlorophyll content increased in
L. perenne,
decreased in
P.
pratensis
and
K.
macrantha
and remained unchanged in red fescue. Carotenoid content decreased in
most cultivars, with only 'Olano' and 'Cindy' exhibiting a slight increase. Highest net photosynthesis rates were
measured for
L. perenne,
lowest values for
R rubra
spp.
trichophylla
and
K. macrantha.
A strong reduction in maximal
photosynthetic capacity was observed for
P.
pratensis
grown under reduced irradiance. In contrast,
R rubra
spp.
rubra
reached higher net CO
2
gas exchange rates. For the other species no differences in the light response curves
(expressed on dry weight basis) were observed between turf plots grown under reduced irradiance and the non-
shaded control ones.
Keywords
Carotenoids; chlorophyll; cool-season species; light; physiology
INTRODUCTION
Shade stresses cause major problems in the
maintenance of good quality turf grasses [Beard, 1973].
In modern sport stadiums, reduction of photosynthetic
active radiation influences significantly durability and
performance of a turf surface [Baker, 1995a and bJ. As-
sociated with reduced irradiance, frequently higher rela-
tive humidity, decreased air movement, temperature
fluctuations and/or drought stress (when shade is caused
by trees) occur [Beard, 1973; Bell and Danneberger,
1999J. Together with reduced levels of irradiance these
altered micro-environmental factors influence morpho-
logical and physiological plant responses [Beard, 1997].
With increased shade, a reduction in tiller density, leaf
area index, dry weight, quantity of clipped material, and
degree of coverage was observed in different species
[Budryte-Aleksandraviciene and Schulz, 1999; Gaussoin
et aI., 1988; Wilkinson and Beard, 1974; Wu etal., 1985].
Furthermore, chlorophyll and carotenoid contents
changed and root density decreased [Bell and
Danneberger, 1999; Newell et a!., 1999; Wilkinson and
Beard, 1974; Wilkinson and Beard, 1975]. At low irradi-
ance, reduction in net photosynthesis and dark respira-
Department of Plant Genetics and Breeding (DvP), CLO-
Gent, Ministry of Small Enterprises, Trnders and Agriculture,
Caritasstraat
21, B-9090 Melle, Belgium
*Corresponding anthor: j.vanhuylenbroeck@clo.fgov.be
tion, lower light saturation levels and decreased light
compensation points are frequently observed in grasses
[Allard et aI., 1991 a,b; Kephart et a!., 1992; Wilkinson
et al., 1975; Woledge, 1971]. Recently published data on
photosynthetic characteristics of perennial ryegrass and
red fescue cultivars also demonstrated that significant
differences between species and within the same species
between cultivars existed [VanHuylenbroeck et
aI.,
1999].
In general, perennial ryegrass had a faster growth with
higher net photosynthesis and quantum efficiency and a
lower dark respiration than red fescue. These results
also showed that sufficient genetic variation in the pho-
tosynthetic parameters (dark respiration, light compen-
sation point, and quantum efficiency) was available in
both perennial ryegrass and red fescue for selection and
breeding purposes. Development of new cultivars with
superior shade adaptation is one of the challenges for
breeders in future.
Good management of a turf surface, choice of
the right grass species and polystand can pardy overcome
problems related with shade. Newly introduced grass
species such as
Deschampsia cespitosa
(L.)
Beauv. seem to
be more tolerant
to
shade compared to perennial ryegrass
and smooth-stalked meadowgrass (Schnotz, 2000].
The objective of this study was to evaluate pho-
tosynthetic capacity of turf grass species and cultivars
under shade. Therefore, photosynthetic characteristics,
354
Table 1. Summary of the perennial ryegrass (J..,oliumperenne L.), Chewings red fescue: (Festuca rubra L. spp.
commutata), slender-creeping red fescues: (Jl. r. spp. trichophylla), strong-creeping red fescue: (Jl. r. spp. ",!,bra),
crested hairgrass [Koeleria macrantha (Ledeb.) Schultes] and smooth-stalked meadowgrass (poapratenslS
L.)
cultivars used in the experiments. (Cultivars indicated with * are not yet commercially available)
Cultivar Species Company/lnstitute Country
Kelvin
Mervue
Olano*
Enjoy
Bargreen
Barlander
Barskol
Nevski
Cindy
Barkoel
Bartitia
Limousine
Lolium perenne
L.
Lolium perenne
L.
Lolium perenne
L.
Festuca rubra L. spp. commutata
Festuca rubra
L.
spp. commutata
Festuca rubra
L.
spp. trichophylla
Festuca rubra
L.
spp. trichophylla
Festuca rubra L. spp. rubra
Festuca rubra L. spp. rubra
Koeleria macrantha (Ledeb.) Schultes
Poa pratensis
L.
Poa pratensis
L.
VanderHave Grasses B.V.
DvP
DvP
Cebeco Zaden B.V.
Barenbrug Holland B.V.
Barenbrug Holland B.V.
Barenbrug Holland B.V.
DvP
Cebeco Zaden B.V.
Barenbrug Holland B.V.
Barenbrug Holland B.V.
Cebeco Zaden B.V.
The Netherlands
Belgium
Belgium
The Netherlands
The Netherlands
The Netherlands
The Netherlands
Belgium
The Netherlands
The Netherlands
The Netherlands
The Netherlands
pigment content, leaf elongation and surface cover were
measured.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A field study was conducted that evaluated three
cuItivars of perennial ryegrass
(Lolium perenne
L.), two
cultivars of Chewings fescue:
(Festuca rubra
L.
spp.
commutata),
two cultivars of slender-creeping red fescue:
(R
r. spp.
trichophylla);
two strong-creeping red fescues:
(R r. spp. rubra), two smooth-stalked meadowgrass culti-
vars
(Paa pratensis
L.)
and one cultivar of crested hairgrass
(Koeleria macrantha
(Ledeb.) Schultes) (Table 1), grown
under two levels of irradiance. Polyethylene fabric shades
were used (Amevo, The Netherlands) to impose irradi-
ance treatments of 65% of ambient sunlight, for com-
parison with a non-shaded treatment. Midday
photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD, 400-700 nm)
on a cloudless summer day was 993 JLmol m-zsoland 1550
JLmolm-zsolfor the 65% and 100% ambient sunlight treat-
ment, respectively. Microclimatic changes in tempera-
ture and humidity due to shading were not recorded.
Experimental design was a completely randomised block
design with two blocks. The different plots (1.5 x 1.5 m)
were sown on 14 May 1999 at the Department of Plant
Genetics and Breeding (DvP), Melle, Belgium (50
0
59'N,
3°49'E), on a sandy-loam soil with the following compo-
sition of mineral fractions: 6.7% clay (<0.002 mm), 30.3%
silt (0.050-0.002 mm) and 63%.sarid (2.0-0.05 mm). Or-
ganic mater of the soil was 2.0% and pH (HP) was 5.82.
Soil water content at field capacity was 27 volume %.
Seed sowing density was 20 g m-
2
for all species. This
resulted in differences in seedling density for the differ-
ent species, which might have had some effects on
growth, tillering and development of the plants. Three
weeks after sowing, shade cloths were placed. After es-
tablishment, the turfs were mown once or twice a week
at a height oB cm with a reel mower (Mastiff, Ransomes).
Clippings were removed each time. No irrigation was
given during the experiment. Fertilisers were applied in
equal amounts on 15
th
ofJune, 1
st
of August and 15
th
of
September. In total 75 kg ha-lN,
SO
kg ha-lPPs and 40
kg ha-lKzO was given during the experimental period.
Nitrogen was given as ammonium nitrate, phosphate as
superphosphate and potassium as potassium sulphate.
Broad-leaved weed incidence was treated with MCPA on
15 July 1999. No fungicides were used.
Growth Measurements
Plant height, measured to the nearest 0.5 cm,
was determined on 3 September 1999 after a nine day
period during which the turf was not mowed. Two sepa-
rate measurements were taken per plot.
Grass cover was visually rated as a percentage of
potential shoot density on 27 August 1999 on two 0.5 m
Z
areas per plot. To compensate for differences in seedling
density between species, percentage of full sunlight were
afterwards standardised for each cultivar to 100% and
the data for the reduced irradiance were transformed as
relative grass cover based on the grass performance in
full sunlight.
Photosynthesis Measurements
Photosynthesis at canopy level was measured
five months after establishement of the stands. An in-
fra-red gas analysis system was used, consisting of ten
glass cuvettes and operated in open differential mode as
described in detail by Lootens and Heursel [1998] and
Van Huylenbroeck et a!. [1999]. Cuvettes were placed
in a growing room which enabled computer control of
all climatic parameters. Each cuvette had a volume of
500 m1. Air flow entering each cuvette was about 0.5 1
min-ldepending on cuvette. COzconcentration of in-
coming and outgoing air was continuously monitored
by using an infra-red
gas
analyser (IRGA, MK3, Ana-
lytical Development Co., Hoddesdon, England). Air tem-
perature (20°C), COzconcentrations (380 JLl
I-I)
and
355
Relative grass cover under
reduced irradiance (performance
under
full
sunlight =100% for
each cultivar)
54
43
48
85
87
90
87
74
70
88
81
88
8.4
14.0
20.0
19.0
8.0
11.5
11.0
13.0
18.5
15.0
10.0
9.0
8.0
3.5
PPFD65%
PPFD 100%
Cultivar
Species
:rabl~ 2. Effects of reduced irradiance on average plant height (cm), and relative grass cover (%)under reduced
lrradlance compared to non-shading conditions (per cultivar, grass cover of the non-shaded plot was standardised
to=100) on different grass cultivars. Values are means (n-4).
Plant height'
L.perenne
Kelvin 10.0
Mervue 14.0
Olano 12.5
F.
r. spp.
commutata
Enjoy 7.0
Bargreen 7.5
F.
r. spp.
trichophylla
Barlander 6.0
Barskol 7.5
Nevski 13.0
Cindy 11.5
Barkoel 6.5
Bartitia 7.0
Limousine 8.0
LSD 2.9
z Plant height was determined 9 days after turf was cut to 3 cm
F.
r. spp.
rubra
K.
macrantha
P.
pratensis
relative humidity (65 %) in the cuvettes remained con-
stant during measurements, while the irradiance level
depended on the measurement. Signals from the IRGA,
thermocouples, and quantum sensor (Li-Cor, Lincoln,
USA) were fed to a datalogger (DL-2, Delta-T, Cam-
bridge, England) connected to an IBM compatible com-
puter, which enabled the program controlled logging of
these parameters. Each cuvette was sampled every 10
minutes.
For measurements, 5 cm diameter turfed cores
were taken of different cultivars, placed in plastic pots
and transferred into cuvettes. Dark respiration (Rd)and
photosynthesis at different PPFD (60, 200, 320, 550 and
700J-Lmolm.
2S'l)
were determined. Irradiation was pro-
vided by fluorescence lamps in combination with incan-
descent lamps. Before measurements were taken, plants
were allowed to adapt over a 30-min period at every
PPFD. Following this acclimation period, 3 subsequent
measurements were taken at each PPFD. Afterwards all
abovesground material (leaves and stems) was removed
and the pots were placed back in cuvettes to determine
soil respiration (soil, roots and rhizomes in the soil). Har-
vested leaves and stems were dried at 80°C for 24 h be-
fore
dry
weight (DW) was measured. For each cultivar,
four different samples were measured. Dark respiration
and net photosynthesis were calculated taking into ac-
count the corrections for soil, root and rhizome respira-
tion and expressed on a DW basis [Masarovicova, 1997J.
Pigment Determination
Leaf samples were taken on 27 August 1999 and
29 September 1999 and stored in liquid nitrogen until
analysis. Pigments (chlorophyll a, b and total caro-
tenoids) were determined spectrophotometrically
(Uvikon 930 spectrophotometer, Kontron Instruments)
after extraction in 80% aceton as described by Amon
[1949J and Lichtenthaler [1987J. During the whole pro-
cedure samples were protected from light. Results were
expressed per unit fresh weight
(FW).
Statistical Analysis
Analysis of variance was conducted on
all
data
using STATGRAFICS [STSC Inc, 1987J. When signifi-
cant differences occurred, means were separated by the
LSD (P=0.05) method. Results are presented as means
:t
standard error (s.e.)
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Under both full sunlight and reduced irradiance
vertical leaf extension of
L.
peT'enne
andF.
rubra
spp.
rubra
cultivars was significantly higher compared to the other
species (Table 2). These observed differences between
species and cultivars are in agreement with earlier mea-
surements under controlled growing conditions [Van
Huylenbroeck et al., 1999J. Except for 'Enjoy', 'Bartitia'
and 'Limousine', leaf elongation in the other cultivars
increased significantly under reduced irradiance com-
pared to full sunlight (Table 2). On average leaf elonga-
tion was 35% higher under reduced irradiance.
Wilkinson and Beard [1974J found that leaf length of
Paa pratensis
and
Festuca rubra
increased with decreasing
irradiance until a critical level. Below this irradiance
leve11eaflength of both species was reduced. Increased
elongation also was observed in other grasses as
bermudagrass
(Cynodon
spp) [Gaussoin et al., 1988J and
Deschampsia
[Pronczuk and Czembor, 1998J. In other
plant species often elongation of certain plant parts (stem)
is observed under moderate reduced irradiance levels.
The capacity to partition the reduced levels of available
356
[ 2.5
.~ 2.0
S
....
1.5
c:
(j)
....
c:
0
u
1.0
>.
.c:
a.
0.5
e
0
:c
u
0.0
!
{:.
[
'I:»
0.4
I:»
E
=-
0.3
c:
S
c:
8
0.2
'C
'0
i
0.1
'2
Cll
o
0.0
(A)
,...
I
.,..
::I:
-
,..
;:r.
I
I-
-
-
c:
(j)
0
>-
c
...
'0
32
>-
III
Cll
(j)
'>
::s
c:
0
(j) (j)
..ll::
III
'C
0
;;
c:
~
Cll
'c
e
'C
l!!
>
c:
~
1::
'iij
Q;
c:
(3
(j)
(5
UJ
E'
CD
Cll
::s
::c
Cll Cll
Z
Cll
0
:IE
Cll
;::
lXl lXl lXl
E
lXl
Cll
lXl
~
Lolium Festuca Koeleria Poa
(8)
I
:r:
-
::r:
:J:
...
::I:
,I
-
-
c:
(j)
0
>-
c:
...
~
:i
>-
!
Cll
(j)
'>
::s
c:
0
(j) (j)
~
'C
;;
C
~~
Cll
c
e
'D
Ie
c:
~
1::
'iij
(5
c:
(j)
(3
(j)
UJ
I:»
Cll Cll Cll Cll
::s
:IE ...
;::
lXl
Z
lXl lXl
0
Cll
E
lXl
Cll
lXl
:J
Lolium
Festuca KoeJeria Poa
Figure
1.
Total chlorophyll (A) and carotenoid (B) content (mg
g-l
FW)
in leaves of
turfgrass
cu1tivars grown under
full
sunlight (PPFD 100%, white bars) or reduced
irradiance (PPFD 65%, hatched bars).Values are means
:t
s.e.
(n=4).
photoassimilates to certain plant parts may control this
phenomena in turfgrasses [Corre, 1983; Schnyder and
Nelson, 1988].
'furf
shoot density decreased under shading
(Table 2). The reduction in shoot density under reduced
irradiance compared to the performance in
full
sunlight
was highest for the
L.
perenne and
R
rubra spp. rubra.
cu1tiVaIS. Similar resultswere reponed earlierin differ-
ent species and itwas concluded that with increased shad~
ing the degree of coverage diminished considerably, not
due to loss of seedlings at emergence, but to a decrease
in tilleting [Budryte-Aleksandraviciene and Schulz,
1999; Wilkinson and
Beard,
1914; Wu et al.,1985].
Pigment composition ofleaves
changed
withre-
duced irradiance, but observed changes depended on
grass
species (Fig. 1). For the threeL. perenne cu1tiv.ars,
total chlorophyll content increased significantly when
grown under shade. In contrast, for 'Barkoe1'
(K.
macrantha) and
P.
pratensis 'Bartitia'and 'Limousine' a
reduction in total chlorophyll was observed (Fig. lA).
For all
R
rubra
cultivars,reduction in irradiance had no
significant effect on chlorophyll concentration. Caro-
tenoid concentration decreased in most cultivars, but
actually increased when cultivars 'Olano' and 'Cindy'
were grown in shade (Fig. lB). Changes in pigment
composition in plants grown under reduced irradiances
are observed in many plant species. In grasses both re-
ductions in pigment contents when growing under shade
conditions [Bell and Danneberger, 1999] as well as in-
creases [Allard et al,1991b] have been reponed. Shade
adapted leaves have frequently higher chlorophyll con-
tents per volume or weight compared to sun adapted
leaves
[Boardman,
1971J. Wilkinson and Beard [1915]
found that chloroplast density decreased in
P.
pratensis
357
250
200 200
150 150
100 100
100%65%
50
0,.
Kelvin 50
0,. Mervue
0
6. , ....
Olano 0
-50 -50
250 250
"'D
..-..
"
en
200 200 -
~::J
3
0
150 150
Q.
'7
(1
0> 100
",0
C\I
100
0
co
0
50 50
.:..
<5
0
E
00~
5
CIl
.
<=
-50 ~
c..
-50
-
250 250
200 200
150 150
100 100
50 100"k65% 50
0o,•
Bartitia
0
o,•
Limousine
-50 -50
0000000008°000000
0000000 00000
,....C\I('1)~LO(Or-. ,....C\I('1)~LO(o"
PPFD (I1molm-
2S-1)
PPFD (IlmoJm-
25-1)
Figure 2. Light response curves of Lolium perenne (A), Festuca rubra spp. commutata (B),
Festuca rubra spp. trichophylla
(C),
Festuea rubra spp. rubra (D),
Koeleria
macrantha (E) and
Poa pratensis
(F)
turfgrass cultivars grown under
full
sunlight (PPFD 100%, open
symbols) or reduced irradiance (PPFD 65%, closed symbols). Values are means
:t
s.e.
(n=4)
(ifnot visible,s.e.smaller than data label).
and
Erubra,
which however could not be associated with
observed differences in turf performance under shade
between the tested cultivars.
Significant differences between species in net
photosynthesis, measured at 700 }.tmolm-
2S-l,
were found
(Table 3).
L.
perenne
reached the highest net photosyn-
thetic rates, while for Er. spp. trichophylla and K.
macrantha
significantlylower values were measured. The
classificationof the species based on the photosynthetic
measurements (Table 3) agreed with those found by mea-
suring plant height (Table 2). Earlier observations un-
der controlled environmental conditions showed similar
results [Van Huylenbroeck et al, 1999]. The measure-
ments of net photosynthesis showed significant interac-
tion between turfgrass species and irradiance pretreat-
ment (Table 3). This isillustratedin the photosynthetic
light response curves (Fig.2). A strong reduction in
maximal photosynthetic capacity was observed for
E
pratensis
'Bartitia'and 'Limousine' grown under reduced
irradiance, In contrast,
E
rubra
spp
rubra
'Nevski' and
'Cindy' grown under shade reached even higher net CO
2
gas exchange rates compared to the control plants.
K.
macrantha
'Barkoel' showed no differences between both
treatments. For
L.
perenne
and
E
rubra spp.
tric/wphylla
observed differences in the light response curves (ex-
pressed on
dry
weight basis) between
turf
plots grown
under reduced irradiance and the non-shaded control
plots depended on the cultivar(Fig. 2). Wilkinson et al.
[1975] found decreased light-saturated net photosyn-
358
**
**
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Po
700
164.7
162.6
194.7 C'
175.4 B
133.5 A
181.4 BC
126.0 A
170.8 B
NSY
REFERENCES
Allard, G., c.J. Nelson, and S.G. Pallardy. 1991a. Shade
effects on growth of tall fescue: I. Leaf anatomy and
dry matter partitioning. Crop Sci. 31: 163-167.
Allard, G., c.J. Nelson,andS.G. Pallardy. 1991b. Shade
effects on growth of tall fescue: II. Leaf gas exchange
characteristics. Crop Sci. 31: 167-172.
Arnon, D.I. 1949. Copper enzymes in isolated chloro-
plasts. Polyphenol oxidase in
Beta vulgaris.
Plant
Physiol. 104: 1033-1041.
Baker, S.W: 1995a. The effects of shade and changes in
microclimate on the quality of turf at professional foot-
ball clubs. I. Questionnaire survey. J. Sports Turf
Res. Inst. 71: 66-74.
Baker, S.W: 1995b. The effects of shade and changes in
microclimate on the quality of turf at professional foot-
ball clubs. 1.1. Pitch survey. J. Sports Turf Res. Inst.
71: 75-83.
Beard, J.B. 1973. Turfgrass: Science and Culture.
Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
Beard, J.B. 1997. Shade stresses and adaptation mecha-
nisms of turf grasses. Int. Turfgrass Soc. Res. J. 8:
1186-1195.
Bell, G.E. , and T.K Danneberger. 1999. Temporal shade
on creeping bentgrass turf. Crop Sci. 39: 1142-1146.
Boardmann, N. 1977. Comparative photosynthesis of
sun and shade plants. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 28:
355-377.
Budryte-Aleksandraviciene, E., and H. Schulz. 1999.
Wirkung unterschiedlicher Beschattungsintensitat auf
die Entwicklung einiger Rasengraserarten und -
sorten. Rasen Turf Gazon 30: 89-94.
Corre, W:J. 1983. Growth and morphogenesis of sun
and shade plants. I. The influence oflight intensity.
Acta Bot. Need. 32: 45-62.
Gaussoin, R.E., A.A. Baltensperger, and B.N. Coffey
1988. Response 0£32 Bermudagrass clones to reduced
light intensity. HortSci.,23: 178-179.
Kephart, KD., D.R. Buxton, and S.E. Taylor. 1992.
Growth ofC3and C4perennial grasses under reduced
irradiance. Crop Sci. 32: 1033-1038.
Lichtenthaler, H.K 1987. Chlorophylls and carotenoids:
pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes. Meth.
Enzym. 148: 350-382.
Lootens,
P.,
and J. Heursel. 1998. Irradiance, tempera-
ture and carbon dioxide enrichment affect photosyn-
thesis in
Phalaenopsis
hybrids. HortSci. 33:
1183-1185.
Masarovicova, E.. 1997. Measurements of plant photo-
synthetic activity. In: M. Pessarakli (ed.) Handbook
of photosynthesis. New York, Marcel Dekker Inc.,
pp. 769-802.
Newell, A.J., J.C. Hart-Woods, and A.D. Wood. 1999.
Effects of four different levels of shade on the perfor-
mance of three grass mixtures for use in lawn tennis
courts. J. Turfgrass Sci. 75: 82-88.
Pronczuk, M. and E. Czembor. 1998. Infection of
Puccinia graminis
to
Deschampsia caespitosa
under sun
and shade conditions. In: B. Boller and F.J.
Irradiance
Turfgrass species
Irradiance x Turfgrass species
z Means followed by the same letter are not
significantly different at P= 0.01
y NS, Non-significant;
**
significant at
P=O.OI,
using analysis of variance
We thank the Department for Crop Husbandry and
&0-
physiology for use of their photosynthesis equipment.
thetic rates, lower dark respiration, and decreased light
compensation points for
R pratensis
and
E rubra
when
grown under reduced irradiance. On the other hand,
Kephart et al. [1992] reported for several C3and C4grass
species that adaptation to shade did not seem to affect
photosynthesis in full sunlight. Plants grown in 37 and
70% of ambient sunlight regimes during 55 days had net
leaf CO2gas exchange rates comparable to those grown
in full sunlight. In
Festuca arundinaceae,
shade grown
leaves never reached photosynthetic capacities of those
developed completely under full sunlight when expressed
on a leaf area basis, but they also were similar when ex-
pressed on a basis of dry matter [Allard et al., 1991b].
These results show that differences in shade tol-
erance as observed between species are related with pho-
tosynthetic features of the species. For breeding
purposes, screening at the individual plant level will be
more efficient compared to measurements at the canopy
level. Further research is therefore necessary to study
the variation between individual plants and their per-
formance under shade conditions.
Photosynthetic light response curves also show
that species
(E rubra
spp
trichophylla, E rubra
spp.
commutata,
K.
macrantha,
and
R pratensis)
performing best
under reduced irradiance (based on grass cover observa-
tions), reached their saturation level at a lower PPFD
than those species
(L.
perenne
and
E rubra
spp.
rubra)
that
were less tolerant.
Table 3. Net photosynthesis (nmol CO
2
g"lDW sol)
measured at PPFD 700 p.mol m-2solfor different
turfgrass species grown in
full
sunlight or at
reduced irradiance (data are means of all cultivars
tested in the experiment)
Source of Variation
Irradiance 100%
65%
Turfgrass species
L.
perenne
F.
r. spp. commutata
F. r. spp. trichophylla
F.
r. spp. rubra
K.
macrantha
P.
pratensis
Stadelmann (eds.), Breeding for a multifunctional
agriculture. Swiss Federal Research Station for
Agroecologyand Agriculture, Ziirich-Reckenholz,pp.
215-217.
Schnotz, G. 2000. Die Rasenschmiele (Deschampsia
cespitosa
[L.]
P.B.-eineAlternativerur die Begriining
von Problemstandorten. Rasen Turf Gazon 31: 25-
27.
Schnyder, H., and C. Nelson. 1988. Growth rates and
assimilate partitioning in the elongation zone of tall
fescue leaf blades at high and low irradiance. Plant
Physiol. 90: 1201-1206.
STSC. 1987. Statgraphics Users' Guide. Rockville:
STSC.
Van Huylenbroeck, J.M., P. Lootens, and E. Van
Bockstaele. 1999. Photosynthetic characteristics of
perennial ryegrass and red fescue turf-grass cultivars.
Grass Forage Sci. 54: 267-274.
Wilkinson, J.R, and J.B. Beard. 1974. Morphological
responses of
Poa pratensis
and
Festuca rubra
to reduced
359
light intensity. In: E.C. Roberts (ed.), Proceedings
SecondInternational TurfgrassResearchConference.
International Turfgrass Society and ASA and CSSA,
Madison, Wisconsin, USA, pp.231-240
Wilkinson, J.R, and J.B. Beard. 1975. Anatomical re-
sponses of 'Merion' Kentucky bluegrass and
'Pennlawn' red fescue at reduced light intensities.
Crop Sci. 15: 189-194.
Wilkinson,J.R,J.B. Beard,andJ.V. Krans. 1975. Pho-
tosynthetic-respiratory responses of 'Merion' Ken-
tucky bluegrass and 'Pennlawn' red fescueat reduced
light intensities. Crop Sci. 15: 165-168.
Wolledge,J. 1971. The effect of light intensity during
growth on the subsequent rate of photosynthesis of
leaves of tall fescue
(Festuca arundinaceae
Schreb.).
Ann. Bot. (London) 35: 311-322.
Wu, L., D. Huff, and W:B. Davis. 1985. Tallfescueturf
performance under a tree shade. HortSci. 20: 281-
282.