We've used direct current resistivity (DC), electromagnetic (EM), induced polarization (IP), and ground-penetrating radar (GPR) geoelectrical methods to study mine dumps. The results reflect lithology, pore water saturation, and dissolved solids in the pore water. If the pore water has a pH less than 5, conductivity maps can indicate acid generating potential. IP measurements can help distinguish mineralogy in mine dumps, especially concentrations of sulfide minerals. EM and DC can help locate acidic/high TDS groundwater associated with mine dumps. GPR methods failed at the sites we studied in the West. Our own conclusions are augmented by those from the recent literature. OVERVIEW A standard general reference on mine waste geophysics is the work of Custis (1994). Other references on mine waste geophysics, containing many instructive examples and good bibliographies, are by King and Pesowski (1993), Patterson (1997), and Campbell et al. (1999). A standard reference on using geophysics for landfills (not necessarily mine dumps, though much of the advice given therein applies to mine dump problems) is by Benson et al. (1983), with a good recent update by Greenhouse et al. (1998). Over the past three years, our group at the US Geological Survey has used direct current resistivity (DC), electromagnetic (EM), induced polarization (IP), and ground-penetrating radar (GPR) geoelectrical methods to study mine dumps. We have also reviewed post-1994 literature on the subject. This report summarizes what we have learned, and is intended as an update to the manual by Custis (1994). BRIEF DESCRIPTIONS OF SOME GEOELECTRICAL METHODS Table 1 lists some major geophysical methods, the physical properties they measure, and their optimal application for mine waste studies. In this report we focus on geoelectrical methods, those that measure electrical conductivity or resistivity. We do so because mine dump material is typically more conductive than host material, and because ground containing effluents with high amounts of total dissolved solids (TDS) and/or acid mine drainage (AMD) is more conductive than ground containing normal pore waters. The conductivity of a geologic unit, in general, reflects its lithology, its porosity, and the saturation and conductivity of its pore water. A unit containing conductive minerals, such as clays (e.g. montmorillonite) or sulfides (e.g. pyrite) will be more conductive than one consisting of silicate minerals. A unit consisting of crushed rock (e.g., most mine dumps) will have higher porosity than uncrushed host rock; this means potentially higher pore water content to carry electrical currents through the unit. The moister a formation is, the higher its conductivity is likely to be. Similarly, increased amounts of dissolved solids and of acid in its pore water will also increase the conductivity of a formation. Figure 1 illustrates the effect of acid, showing that for pH values less than about 5, the conductivity of mine leachate waters is inversely proportional to pH. Usually the conductivities of leachate waters and pore waters are similar. To move from pore water conductivity to formation conductivity, measured geoelectrically, one must divide by a so-called formation factor that depends on the lithology of the formation. Typical formation factors fall in the range from S to 20. This suggests that in dumps that are fairly uniform and generally moist, and as long as the pH of the pore water is S or less, a conductivity map might help