ArticlePDF Available

The Scottish Path to Independence | Economic and Political Weeklyin/web-exclusives/scottish-path-independence.html 1/3 Home Archives Subscription RSS About Us Contact Us For Contributors Editorial Commentary Book Reviews Perspectives Special Articles Specials Web Exclusives Blogs More Hom e Web Exclusives

Authors:

Abstract

A A A Change Text Size The Scottish Path to Independence Vol -XLIX No. 37, September 13, 2014 | Pritam Singh Web Exclusives Bibtex Endnote RIS Google Scholar Print Email The outcome of the Scottish referendum vote on 18 Septemb er notwithstanding, the major legacy of the vote would b e the transparent and democratic nature of the process leading to the vote. Pritam Singh (psingh@brookes.ac.uk) teaches at the Department of Accounting, Finance and Economics, Faculty of Business, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford. The outcome of the referendum on Scottish independence from Britain is certainly of huge significance for Britain, Europe and even beyond but what has been missed in the debate on Scottish independence is the significance of the process leading to the outcome. The process of arriving at the outcome determines the legitimacy and the quality of the outcome. In the Scottish case, the process has been so democratic, open, and transparent that it is close to being exemplary. The decision to have a referendum has been arrived at after a long period of debate and negotiations. That Scotland, which became a part of the United Kingdom in 1707, has a distinctive identity is very well recognised by all sides on the debate. This recognition of distinctive identity was given further boost during Tony Blair's prime ministership when the long standing demand of Scottish people to have their own parliament was accepted and the Scottish Parliament with devolved powers started functioning in 1999. This devolved power was partly aimed to weaken the demand for full independence which was at that time a minority political tendency. The decision to create the Scottish Parliament by the Blair government was not seen as a party partisan initiative but was arrived at in a consensual manner by all sides of the Westminster-based political establishment. The three mainstream British political parties -the Conservative, Labour and the Liberal Democrats -all agreed on the need for a Scottish Parliament with devolved powers. The role of the Scottish National Party
9/19/2014 The Scottish Path to Independence | Economic and Political Weekly
http://www.epw.in/web-exclusives/scottish-path-independence.html 1/3
Home Archives Subscription RSS About Us Contact Us For Contributors
Editorial Commentary Book Reviews Perspec tives Special Articles Specials Web Exclusives Blogs More
Home Web Exclus ives
A
AA
Cha nge Text Size
The Scottish Path to Independence
Vol - XLIX No. 37, September 13, 2014 | Pritam Singh Web Exclusives
Bibtex Endnote RIS Goo gle Scho lar Print Em ail
The outcom e of the Scottish referendu m vote on 18 Septem be r notwithstanding , the major le gacy of the vote would b e
the transparen t and dem ocratic nature of the process lead ing to the vote.
Pritam Sin gh (ps ingh@brookes .ac.uk) teache s at the Depa rtmen t of Accounting, Finance and Econom ics , Faculty of
Busi nes s, Oxford Brookes Univers ity, Oxford.
The outcom e of the referendu m on Scottis h ind epend ence from Britain is certainl y of hug e significan ce for Britain,
Europe and even beyond but what has been missed in the debate on Scottish independence is the significance of the
proces s leading to the outcome . The process of arriving at the outcom e determ ines the legitima cy and the quality of
the outcom e. In the Scottish cas e, the proces s has be en s o dem ocratic, open , and transp arent that it is clo se to bei ng
exemplary. The decision to have a referendum has been arrived at after a long period of debate and negotiations. That
Scotland, whi ch becam e a part of the Uni ted Kingdo m in 1707, has a dis tinctive identity is very well recogni sed by all
sid es on the debate. This recogn ition of dis tinctive iden tity was given further boos t durin g Tony Blair’s prime
min is tership when the long s tandin g dem and of Scottis h people to have their own parl iam ent was accepted and the
Scottish Parl iam ent with devolved powe rs s tarted functioni ng in 19 99. This de volved power was partly aimed to
weaken the dem and for full ind epen dence wh ich was at that time a m inori ty pol itical tendency. The deci si on to create
the Scottish Parl iam ent by the Blair governme nt was not seen as a pa rty partis an initiative but was arrived at in a
cons ens ual mann er by all sides of the Wes tmin ster-ba se d politica l es tablis hment. The three mai ns tream British
politica l parties - the Cons ervative, Labour and the Liberal Dem ocrats - all agreed on the need for a Scottis h
Parliam ent with devolved po wers .
The role of the Scottish National Party
The Scottish Na tional Party (SNP), formed in 1934 , has bee n the ma in cham pion of comple te indep enden ce althou gh
sub se quently the dem and for indepen dence ha s be en su pported by the Scottis h Social ist Party and the Scottis h
Green Party. SNP rem aine d a minor poli tical current in Scottish pol itics which for a long time ha s bee n dom inated by
the Labou r party. Even the estab lis hm ent of the Scottish Parli am ent in 1999 did not ena ble the SNP to becom e the
larges t, ruling politica l party although it em erged as the s econd larges t party and the main oppos ition party.
However, in 2007 the party emerged as the s ingl e larges t party in the Scottish parl iam ent and form ed a m inori ty
governme nt with su pport from the Green Party. In 2011, it gain ed an abs olute majo rity in the Scottish Parliamen t but
still did not clai m that its electoral victory should be see n as an evidence of Scottish peopl e’s sup port for complete
indep ende nce. It put forwa rd a cas e for Scottish ind epen dence wi th a dem and for referend um on the issue . On the
oppos ite side, the UK governm ent did not ignore the ele ctoral victory of the SNP and graduall y came to accept the need
for referendum to determ ine Scottish peo ple’ s choi ce regard ing indepen dence. This eventually resu lted in the UK
government and the Scottish government agreeing in 2013 on the arrangements for the referendum. 18 September,
2014 date was agreed for the referendum vote and the question on the vote agreed was: Should Scotland be an
indep ende nt country? It was als o agreed that there would be only two choices for the voters: Yes or No. Although the
SNP wanted a third choice of grea ter devolution of powe rs to Scotland sho rt of comple te indepe nden ce, it eventua lly
agreed to the UK governmen t’s ins istence on m akin g a clear choi ce betwee n Yes and No.
Secess ion – Military suppression or political solution?
There are not m any examples of su ch agreed way of resolving the dem ands for secess ion. The closes t one be fore
this ha s be en the Quebec refere ndum to sec ede from Canada in which the s eces sionis ts los t the vote. Most
dem ands for se cessio n get resolved either by mili tary suppres sion of the secess ionist m ovement or by the
sece ss ionists winning the m ilitary battle and achi eving inde pende nce. In both cas es, the leg itim acy of the outcome
rema ins a contes ted is sue. The mos t well-kn own examp le of peace ful sece ss ion (“the velvet divorce”) is the
sep aration of Czech Republic an d Slovakia but here the elites of the two regions agre ed to sep arate; the dem ocratic
choice of the peo ple of the s ecedin g regio n Slovakia was not as certained .
In the case of Baltic States of Estoni a, Latvia and Lithuan ia, these states got independe nce through peaceful means of
mas sive mas s m obilis ation bu t no vote was all owed . Russ ia, the dom inant region of the crum bli ng Soviet empi re, that
had econ om ic and pol itical in terests in keep ing control over the Baltic states , was not in a fit state-mil itarily and
Vol - XLIX No. 3 7
September 13, 2014
Table of Contents
Zoom Cover
Fre e Issues
September 13, 2014
September 6, 2014
August 30, 2014
August 23, 2014
SUBSCRIBE
Sele cte d Writings of Balraj Puri
1) Kash mi ri Muslim s, Islam and Kas hm iri
Tradition
2) The Era of Sheikh Moham me d Abdullah - I
3) The Era of Sheikh Moham ma d Abdullah - II
4) Basi s for a New Edifice
POSTSCRIPT
Posts cript is a back-of-the-boo k sectio n on the
arts, culture an d so ciety that will be a
comp endi um of short piece s of reportage,
comm entary, criticis m, travel writing, cartoon s,
satire and m ore.
Breathles s Kabaddi
Invisible Invincibility
From LoO to LoP to LoO
Las t Lines
The Garden of My Child hood
more articles ...
Election Spe cial
Coverage of the Lok Sabha elections
Data from pre vious el ections
EPW archives and m ore
To visit the interactive page click here.
Search
Search
9/19/2014 The Scottish Path to Independence | Economic and Political Weekly
http://www.epw.in/web-exclusives/scottish-path-independence.html 2/3
4
0
politica lly- to suppre ss the inde pend ence m oves of thes e states but now it constantly rese nts in different ways, as
see n mo st starkly in the recent Ukrainia n case, that these form er Soviet republics managed to becom e indep ende nt.
The dis puted ou tcome is significan tly due to the lack of perceived legitim acy of the process of achie ving independen ce
in the cas e of som e of the form er Soviet republics .
The most recent case of sece ssion (South Sudan) is als o interes ting from the view point of the proces s of achieving
sece ss ion. Althoug h there have been violen t conflicts du e to perso nal po litical rivalrie s, the leg itima cy of the s eces si on
has not been doubted due to the referendum vote that had led to secession.
Conclusion
In the Scottish case, almos t every aspect regarding the case for and against independence has been debated and
mos t si gnifica ntly in the form of national ly televised deb ates be tween Alex Salmod , the First Minister of Scotland,
arguing the case for independence and Alistair Darling, a Labour leader, arguing the case against independence on
behal f of all the three ma ins tream British parties . Whatever the outcome of the referen dum vote on 18 Septemb er
mig ht be, the maj or legacy of the vote wou ld be the trans parent and dem ocratic nature of the process lea ding to the
vote. It would no t be an exaggeratio n to say that Scottish exampl e mi ght becom e the tem plate for res olving
sece ss ionist dis putes in the proce ss . The very high in tensi ty of interes t sh own by Catalonia, the region with a dem and
for seces sion from Spain, in the Scottis h referend um debate and vote is a pointer in this dire ction.
26
Like
Relat ed Article s
The South Sudan Referendum
Quebec Sepa ratis m October Refere ndum and Beyond
Could the Kingdo m Still Be Un ited?
Comments
EPW looks forward to your com m ents. Please note that com m ents are mo derated as per our com me nts policy.
They may tak e som e time to appear. A c omment, if suitab le, may b e selected f or publication in
the Letters pages of EPW.
0 Comments Economic and Political Weekly
Login
Sort by Best Share
Start the discussion…
Be the first to comment.
Subscribe
Add Disqus to your site
d
Favorite
Review Issues Special Issues
Review of Rural Affairs: June 29, 2013
With Indian agri culture gro wing s lowly,
emp loymen t in agriculture too has been
increas ing at a low rate. Urban em plo yment has
not expanded rapidly enough to provide work for
the growin g rural po pulatio n. So, is the ris e in
non-ag ricultura l employmen t in recent years
driven more by distres s than de ma nd? Three
articles in this editio n of the Review of Rural
Affairs look at aspects of this is sue.
A couple of related is s ues that are examine d are
the growth of “non-cu ltivating hous eholds” and
the movem ent of wages of agricu ltural lab our.
Read Re view of Rural Affairs
For All Review Issue s
EPW - iOS and Android apps
The EPW iOS app for iPad and iPho ne is now
live in the App Store. An updated version of the
Android app (Versi on 2.0) is als o availabl e on
the Google Pla y store. Pleas e downl oad the free
apps to acces s EPW on your phone an d tablet.
EPW can also be read on the mobi le s ite:
http://m.epw.in
Recent Comments Most read
Jyotiraj
Los s an d dam age in Kashmir, Uttarakha nd
and Malin are pri ma rily becaus e of a gros s
lack of investm ents and ins titutiona l su pport
for prepared nes s at various levels . A cavalier
attitude and...
More Tears for Kash mi r · 4 days ago
9/19/2014 The Scottish Path to Independence | Economic and Political Weekly
http://www.epw.in/web-exclusives/scottish-path-independence.html 3/3
subh as is
This articl e is so true, even I watch DD News
in order to be actua lly informe d. No news
channe l covers the new s of a state visi t of any
min is ter or heads of state, unle ss it is pretty
much ...
In Defence of Doordarshan · 4 days ago
User login
Subscribe for Newslette r
Select the news letter to s ubs cribe or
uns ubs cribe.
EPW Newsle tter
Emai l: *
Subscribe
Unsubscribe
EPW E-books
Select EPW books are now availa ble as e-boo ks in
Kindle and iBoo k (Apple) formats .
Details are here.
Terms & Policy
Terms and Conditions
Copyright
Privacy Policy
Style Sheet
Circulation
Refund and Cancellation
User Registration
Delivery Policy
Adve rtiseme nt
Why Advertise in EPW ?
Advertisement Tariffs
Announcem ents / Appoi ntme nts (PDF)
EPW Research Foun datio n
EPW Resea rch Founda tion is involved in
econom ic research an d anal ysis, and
does sp ecific res earch s tudies on Indi a's
macro econom y...
320-3 21, A to Z Indu strial Estat e, Ga npatrao Ka dam M arg, L ower Parel , Mum bai, In dia 40 0 013
Phon e: +91-22-4 0638282 | Fax: +91-22-2493 4515 | E-mai l: conta ct@epw.in
Designed, developed and maintained by Yodasoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.