Content uploaded by Miklos Pless
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Miklos Pless
Content may be subject to copyright.
Available via license: CC BY-NC 4.0
Content may be subject to copyright.
Case Rep Oncol 2010;3:182–188
DOI: 10.1159/000315366
Published online: June 8, 2010 © 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel
ISSN 1662–6575
www.karger.com/cro
Sabina Schacher-Kaufmann Medical Oncology, Cantonal Hospital, Brauerstrasse 15
CH–8401 Winterthur (Switzerland)
Tel. +41 52 266 25 52, Fax +41 52 266 45 20, E-Mail sabina.schacher @ ksw.ch
182
Acute Fatal Liver Toxicity under
Erlotinib
Sabina Schacher-Kaufmann Miklos Pless
Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Winterthur,
Switzerland
Key Words
Erlotinib · Non-small cell lung cancer · NSCLC · Liver toxicity · Hepatopathy
Abstract
We describe the case of a never-smoker who received second-line erlotinib as a
treatment for his non-small cell lung cancer. Within one month, acute hepatic failure
developed as well as a thrombotic-thrombocytopenic microangiopathy, with fatal
outcome. In patients with non-small cell lung cancer, hepatic toxicity of erlotinib is a rare
but severe complication; so far three fatal cases have been reported. Patients’ liver
function should be assessed before starting erlotinib and special care is recommended if
pretreatment bilirubin is elevated.
Erlotinib (Tarceva쏐) is an oral, reversible epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)
tyrosine-kinase inhibitor. The drug was approved by the FDA in 2004 for treatment of
patients with locally advanced or metastasized non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and in
2005, in combination with gemcitabine, for treatment of patients with pancreatic cancer,
both on the basis of randomized phase III studies [1, 2]. In a clinical phase I study, a daily
dose of 150 mg proved to be the maximum tolerated dose, the dose-limiting toxicities
being diarrhea, skin reactions und fatigue [3]. Serious liver dysfunction was rarely found
in phase III studies [1, 2, 4]. However, in the last two years there have been a number of
case reports on acute, severe liver toxicity with erlotinib [5, 6], a few with a fatal outcome
[7, 8]. We are describing the case of a patient with metastasized NSCLC, who developed
acute liver failure with a fatal coagulation complication under erlotinib treatment.
Case Report
A 53-year-old never-smoker was diagnosed with a deep leg vein thrombosis and one month later
with an adenocarcinoma of the lung (negative for EGFR mutation and EML4-ALK translocation), stage
IVB with a malignant pleural effusion. A nonproductive cough had been the only symptom.
Anticoagulation with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) was started, overlapping with
phenprocoumon. A palliative chemotherapy with 4 cycles of cisplatin/vinorelbine was given, which
Case Rep Oncol 2010;3:182–188
DOI: 10.1159/000315366
Published online: June 8, 2010 © 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel
ISSN 1662–6575
www.karger.com/cro
183
resulted in a partial remission. Ten weeks later, the patient complained of a deterioration of his
performance status, and pulmonary and pleural tumor progression as well as the suspicion of a new
liver metastasis were diagnosed (fig. 1a). Laboratory results showed an anemia of 115 g/l, otherwise
normal hematology; ASAT/ALAT, alkaline phosphatase and creatinine were within the normal range,
bilirubin 19 μmol/l (<17), LDH 587 U/l (<450). A second-line therapy with a daily dose of 150 mg
erlotinib was started.
On the ninth day of therapy, the patient was bedridden, complained of lack of appetite and reported
being unable to walk. Clinically, he was in a bad general condition with a performance status 3. A
discrete folliculitis of the thoracic aperture and a relapse of the leg vein thrombosis were found, but
there was no evidence of neurological pathologies. Phenprocoumon was stopped and LMWH was
resumed in a therapeutic dose. The laboratory results showed constant anemia, discrete signs of
cholestasis, further elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and minor renal insufficiency. The
transaminases were not measured. We interpreted the general condition to be a consequence of the
tumor and the recurring deep vein thrombosis. Erlotinib was continued.
On the 17th day of therapy, the patient was hospitalized due to further deterioration of his general
condition, with a fever of 39.6°C, vomiting and upper abdominal pain. A slight anemia of 110 g/l was
found, Lc were 11.7 × 109/l, Tc 291 × 109/l, INR 4.55, bilirubin 20 μmol/l, alkaline phosphatase 475 U/l,
LDH 1,856 U/l, ASAT 1,011 U/l, ALAT 2,050 U/l, creatinine 120 μmol/l, CRP 132 mg/l (fig. 2). Blood
cultures and serologies for hepatitis A, B and C were negative.
The abdominal ultrasound showed a severely inhomogeneous liver, as well as progression of the liver
metastasis in segment II and thickening of the gall bladder. The differential diagnosis at this point was
acute hepatitis or cholangitis and an antibiotic therapy with ciprofloxacin und metronidazole was
initiated. Erlotinib was stopped since drug-induced hepatitis could not be excluded.
On day 24 after starting erlotinib, the patient complained of excruciating pain in his right upper
abdomen. Another rise in temperature was documented. The lab results showed an anemia of Hb 118
g/l, Lc 21.9 × 109/l, Tc 134 × 109/l, some fragmentocytes, INR 1.68, fibrinogen 1.7 g/l (2–4), factor II 49%
(70–120), factor V 64% (70–140), bilirubin 80 μmol/l, alkaline phosphatase 814 U/l, LDH 5,841 U/l,
ASAT 3,511 U/l, ALAT 884 U/l, creatinine 100 μmol/l, CRP 149mg/l (fig. 2). A CT scan revealed a
pulmonary and pleural tumor progression, edema of the gallbladder and also fresh hypodense areas in
the liver and hypodensities of the kidney and the upper pole of the spleen, which were interpreted as
necrosis (fig. 1b). Sonographically, the portal vein was dilated. The patient was put on hydration, and
allopurinol and vitamin K were given; LMWH was continued.
On day 30, acral necrosis of the toes was found. All peripheral pulses were palpable. The lab results
showed constant anemia with elevated reticuloytes 276 × 109/l (35–105), a further drop in factor V,
antithrombin III 23% (75–120), haptoglobin 0.2 g/l (0.6–3.6), a negative result in the PF4 antibody and
the direct Coombs test, an increase in bilirubin with unchanged alkaline phosphatase and declining
transaminases (fig. 2). The diagnosis of thrombotic microangiopathy with compensated hemolysis was
made and an antithrombin III substitution with fresh frozen plasma was started.
A heparin-induced thrombocytopenia was ruled out because of the lack of PF4 antibodies. After
unstoppable deterioration of his general condition, the patient died three days later.
Consent
The patient has unfortunately passed away and could not give his informed consent. There is no
immediate family to be contacted. All patient data are completely anonymized.
Discussion
This unfortunate patient died of acute liver failure, most likely due to erlotinib. First,
there was a rapidly progressive hepatopathy, which led to hospitalization 17 days after
initiating erlotinib. The patient presented a clinical picture of acute hepatitis. A second
row of events began on the seventh day of hospitalization with massive liver necrosis and
signs of a blood coagulation disorder.
Case Rep Oncol 2010;3:182–188
DOI: 10.1159/000315366
Published online: June 8, 2010 © 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel
ISSN 1662–6575
www.karger.com/cro
184
We attribute the acute hepatitis to the medication with erlotinib. The drug is
metabolized hepatically through the enzymes CYP3A4 und CYP1A2 of cytochrome P450.
Drug interaction can therefore affect the metabolism of erlotinib and possibly increase the
toxicity. During the first week of therapy, the only other comedication the patient took
was phenprocoumon. Phenprocoumon is partially inactivated by CYP3A4. When giving
erlotinib and coumarines simultaneously, an increase in INR but not in erlotinib
clearance has been described [12]. Consequently, we do not think that the combination
was the cause of the described toxicity.
The time course of the liver toxicity correlates with other documented case reports
(table 1). Presently it is unclear why exclusively cases with lung cancer took a fatal course.
Perhaps this is merely a quantitative problem; erlotinib is used in many more patients
with NSCLC than in patients with other cancers. Alternatively, the dose of erlotinib might
be relevant. In patients with pancreatic cancer, erlotinib was dosed mostly at 100 mg/day
in combination with gemcitabine [2]. In this study, the grade 3/4 liver toxicities were
comparable between gemcitabine alone and the combination of erlotinib and gemcitabine
(grade 3 elevation of ASAT/ALAT 18 vs. 23%, of bilirubin 10% in both groups), and were
likely to be tumor-related. In phase III studies in NSCLC patients, no [4] or just moderate
liver enzyme increases (4% grade 2 vs. 0% [1]) were found. However, only patients
without [1], or with liver enzyme increase grade ≤1 [4] were included in these trials. This
is also the case for the phase I study [3], in which a therapy-associated bilirubinemia grade
1 is described in 8/40 patients, but transaminases did not increase. More recent
pharmacokinetic data of patients with preexisting liver function problems are not
conclusive [9, 10]. The most significant factor to impair drug clearance seems to be
increased bilirubin [9]. Miller et al. [10] come to the conclusion that patients with
pretherapeutic liver dysfunction should be started on a reduced dose of erlotinib of 75
mg/day.
It is not known why a few patients react to erlotinib with such massive toxicity.
Pharmacogenomical studies have shown polymorphisms on the CYP3A4- as well as on
the CYP3A5-gene and have investigated their effect on the pharmacokinetics of erlotinib
[11]. No clear correlation was found, not even on commonly observed toxicities such as
exanthema or diarrhea. Further pharmacogenetic research is warranted.
Recently published cases of acute liver toxicity under erlotinib have caused OSI
Pharmaceuticals and Genentech to inform the physicians of this data in a ‘Dear Doctor’
letter in September 2008 and to amend the drug information accordingly. References to
‘hepatotoxicity’ and ‘patients with hepatic impairment’ now appear in the chapter
‘warnings’ [12]. Special caution is indicated in patients with pretreatment elevations of
bilirubin, but no dose reduction of erlotinib is suggested.
This patient’s course was complicated by a blood coagulation disorder. On the seventh
day in the hospital, at the time of the massive liver necrosis, first symptoms of a
microangiopathic and disseminated coagulopathy occurred: fragmentocytes,
thrombocytopenia, diminished fibrogen as well as factor V. It can be assumed that the
cause of the coagulation disorder was multifactorial, the extensive liver cell necrosis being
an important contributing factor. Considering the patient’s history with a deep vein
thrombosis as the first symptom of his malignancy, there was probably a tumor-
associated coagulopathy involved as well, which is a common paraneoplastic symptom,
frequently seen in adenocarcinomas of the lung [13, 14]. A direct link between erlotinib
monotherapy and coagulopathy seems less likely; there are no reports in the literature to
support such a hypothesis. Two cases of patients with pancreatic cancer and treatment
with erlotinib and gemcitabine who developed microangiopathic hemolytic anemia with
Case Rep Oncol 2010;3:182–188
DOI: 10.1159/000315366
Published online: June 8, 2010 © 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel
ISSN 1662–6575
www.karger.com/cro
185
thrombocytopenia have been described; this complication was, however, most likely
caused by gemcitabine [15]. Thus, we believe that the coagulopathy was not a direct
consequence of erlotinib but rather an indirect effect of erlotinib-induced acute hepatitis.
We are describing the third case of a fatal liver toxicity in a patient with
adenocarcinoma of the lung under treatment with erlotinib. It is estimated that each year
more than 100’000 patients receive erlotinib. Therefore, fortunately, this seems to be a
very rare complication [16]. However, because of its severity, we think it is important that
prescribing physicians know about this potential danger. We suggest monitoring liver
function tests after initiating erlotinib, and stopping treatment if there is a suspicion of
drug-induced hepatitis. Patients with preexisting elevations of bilirubin should be
monitored with special care and in these patients reducing the dose of erlotinib could be
considered [9, 10].
Table 1. Summary of published cases of erlotinib-induced acute liver toxicity
Diagnosis Age/
sex
Dose of
erlotinib
mg
Concomitant
drug
Known liver
function
abnormality
Time to first
elevation
LFT
Outcome Time to
recover
LFT
Liu et al., 2007
[7]
lung cancer 67/F 150
100 by
reinduction
none none day 14
day 10 after
reinduction
fatal
Ramanarayanan
and Scarpace,
2007 [5]
pancreatic
cancer
70/M 100 gemcitabine none day 14 recovered 6 weeks
Saif, 2008 [6] pancreatic
cancer
52/M 100 gemcitabine none week 7 recovered 8 weeks
Pellegrinotti et al.,
2009 [8]
lung cancer 77/M 100 oral antidiabetic
omeprazole
prednisone
furosemide
none day 12 fatal
Present case lung cancer 53/M 150 phenpro-
coumon
liver
metastasis
day 10 fatal
LFT = Liver function tests.
Case Rep Oncol 2010;3:182–188
DOI: 10.1159/000315366
Published online: June 8, 2010 © 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel
ISSN 1662–6575
www.karger.com/cro
186
Fig. 1. a 4 days before the initiation of therapy. b 24th day of erlotinib treatment.
Case Rep Oncol 2010;3:182–188
DOI: 10.1159/000315366
Published online: June 8, 2010 © 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel
ISSN 1662–6575
www.karger.com/cro
187
Fig. 2. Evolution of laboratory parameters.
Case Rep Oncol 2010;3:182–188
DOI: 10.1159/000315366
Published online: June 8, 2010 © 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel
ISSN 1662–6575
www.karger.com/cro
188
References
1 Shepherd FA, Rodrigues Pereira J, Ciuleanu T, et al: Erlotinib in previously
treated non-small lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2005;353:123–132.
2 Moore MJ, Goldstein D, Hamm J, et al: Erlotinib plus gemcitabine compared with
gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase III trial of
the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. J Clin Oncol
2007;25:1960–1966.
3 Hidalgo M, Siu LL, Nemunaitis J, Rizzo J, Hammond LA, Takimoto C, et al: Phase
I and pharmacologic study of OSI-774, an epidermal growth factor receptor
tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid malignancies. J Clin
Oncol 2001;s19:3267–3279.
4 Herbst RS, Prager D, Hermann R, Fehrenbacher L, Johnson BE, Sandler A, et al:
TRIBUTE: a phase III trial of erlotinib hydrochlorid (OSI-774) combined with
carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
J Clin Oncol 2005;23:5892–5899.
5 Ramanarayanan J, Scarpace SL: Acute drug induced hepatitis due to erlotinib. J
Pancreas 2007;8:39–43.
6 Saif MW: Erlotinib-induced acute hepatitis in a patient with pancreatic cancer.
Clin Adv Hematol Oncol 2008;6:191–199.
7 Liu W, Markauer FL, Qamar AA, Jänne PA, Odze RD: Fulminant hepatic failure
secondary to erlotinib. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007;5:917–920s.
8 Pellegrinotti M, Fimognari FL, Franco A, Repetto L, Pastorelli R: Erlotinib-
induced hepatitis complicated by fatal lactic acidosis in an elderly man with lung
cancer. Ann Pharmacother 2009;43:542–545.
9 Lu JF, Eppler SM, Wolf J, Hamilton M, Rakhit A, Bruno R, Lum BL: Clinical
pharmacokinetics of erlotinib in patients with solid tumors and exposure-safety
relationships in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Pharmacol Ther
2006;80:136–145.
10 Miller A, Murry D, Owzar K, Hollis D, Lewis L, Kindler H, Marshall J, et al: Phase
I and pharmacokinetic study of erlotinib for solid tumors in patients with hepatic
or renal dysfunction: CALGB 60101. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:3055–3060.
11 Rudin Ch, Liu W, Desai A, Karrison T, Jiang X, et al: Pharmacogenomic and
pharmacokinetic determinants of erlotinib toxicity. J Clin Oncol 2007;26:1119–
1127.
12 Genentech, Inc (2008)
http://www.gene.com/gene/products/information/pdf/tarceva-pr (accessed 1
October 2008).
13 Tagalakis V, Levi D, Agulnik JS, Cohen V, Kasymjanova G, Small D: High risk of
deep vein thrombosis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a cohort study
of 493 patients. J Thorac Oncol 2007;2:729–734.
14 Blom JW, Osanto S, Rosendaal FR: The risk of a venous thrombotic event in lung
cancer patients: higher risk for adenocarcinoma than squamous cell carconoma. J
Thromb Haemost 2004;2:1760–1765.
15 Izzedine H, Isnard-Bagnis C, Launay-Vacher V, Mercadal L, Tostivint I, et al:
Gemcitabine-induced thrombotic microangiopathy: a systemic review. Nephrol
Dial transplant 2006;21:3038–3045.
16 Roche Pharmaceuticals, annual report 2008;39.